D
dzheremi
Guest
I think it’s common to see any disagreement by an “ex-” something as an attack. It’s not right, but it is common. Since I left RCism for Orthodoxy, I’ve been told by my former co-religionists that I’m “attacking” RCism when I disagree with it, even when it concerns things that I also disagreed with when I was still RC myself (e.g., certain excesses in Marian devotion that I saw around me). Luckily (?), the vast majority of Copts do not know enough about RCism to think of my background as anything but a positive, so the fact that it really was positive has been reinforced to me in my life in the Orthodox Church. That’s why I always look askance at people here on CAF or elsewhere who characterize me or Orthodox in general as “attacking” or “hating” the RCC. If it seems to some RCs that ex-Catholics are comforting themselves and licking their wounds by indulging in stereotypes and attacks of the RC, then you should also recognize that from the other side it looks the same: Catholics tell us ex-RCs that we are being hateful, attacking, unreasonable, uncharitable, etc. essentially just for existing and not agreeing with the RC, even if our experience outside of specific doctrinal/ecclesiological/theological disagreements is overwhelmingly positive. In recognition and gratitude of the positive effect that the RCC and many people in it have had in my life, I stay here on CAF (with frequent breaks, I’ll admit) despite the endless insistence from RCs that as an ex-RC I’ve been duped, I’m “ignorant” (adding “invincible” before this does not make it any less rude, by the way), I’m risking my salvation, I’m in a 'heretical" church/communion, etc.
It cuts both ways, I’m saying, so this thread is really not very becoming of current Catholics.
It cuts both ways, I’m saying, so this thread is really not very becoming of current Catholics.