Exact Terminology argument

[po18guy]

Remember that you can argue against intellect, but not against ego. The “reformation” was most certainly ego-driven, and a large percentage of bible “Christianity” these days is also ego-driven.

Bearing in mind that the most vociferous anti-Catholics may not even be baptized. Thus, by the bible; by Christ’s words, they are not Christian.

 

[EndTimes]

Bearing in mind that the most vociferous anti-Catholics may not even be baptized

This was true with say those who brought Jesus before Pilate…

 

[po18guy]

See the attitude?

Yeah…

 

[EndTimes]

See the attitude…

Yep!

Plus… It’s only God who Knows all who’re Baptised via Desire

 

[po18guy]

They generally don’t have a chip on their shoulder…

But they certainly have memorized Saint Paul out of context:

1 Corinthians 1:17
For Christ did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel, and not with eloquent wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.

Ya see? baptism is no longer necessary - since Paul apparently saves some of them…

 

[EndTimes]

baptism is no longer necessary - since Paul apparently saves some of them…

Nope… Anything else?

 

[po18guy]

A little too cryptic. What do you mean exactly?

 

[EndTimes]

A little too cryptic. What do you mean exactly?

It’s one of several ways of saying that
" baptism is no longer necessary - since Paul apparently saves some of them… "
is False.

 

[po18guy]

Go read C.A.R.M. They twist Paul to indicate/assume that baptism is no longer necessary.

I didn’t just make stuff up.