Excommunication result of Brazil Girl's abortion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flame4
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If the girl died as a result of attempting to carry to term - knowing the additional risks - how is that pro-life?
Assuming all possible medical precautions were taken, which they were being it would be tragic (well regardless). You have a twisted sense of “pro-life” if you think it includes “abortion whenever I think it should happen”. You keep ignoring the facts at hand, to the ends of supporting an abortion.
 
But in this case, the mother (i.e. the girl) did nothing to create the pregnancy - she’s not responsible for it in any way. …
So knock off an innocent, helpless child instead, one who also had nothing to do with the alleged rape.
 
Assuming all possible medical precautions were taken, which they were being it would be tragic (well regardless). You have a twisted sense of “pro-life” if you think it includes “abortion whenever I think it should happen”. You keep ignoring the facts at hand, to the ends of supporting an abortion.
Your comments include a supposition which I have never stated.
 
Your comments include a supposition which I have never stated.
But you did, you personally feel that there should be an “exception here”… Whether or not you are otherwise profile, you beleive you’ve found a case where you think an abortion is perfectly ok. You are (trying to) using your own private judgement to over rule the Magisterium of the Church which believe it or not, has actually thought through this (and all other moral issues) at a depth which the rest of us don’t even have the time to consider. So I feel confident enough in what I said whether you generally consider your self pro-life, pro-choice or ambivilent (which ultimatly is a pro-choice position).

The genuin pro-life position is this, the direct abortion of a child is never moral under any circomstance. There are no exceptions, a direct abortion is not the right choice. At the same time, all steps should be taken to preserve the health and welfair of the mother to be, and in tragic cases like this we should do our best to remove childeren from environments in which they will be violated.
 
Some time ago a 7 year old girl recieved an abortion and her mother and the doctor were excommunicated.


Now the girl was raped by her step father. I know someone challenging me on this saying the Church is not punishing the right people (the father.) …
How much say did the father have in this matter? I don’t know about Brazil, but in the U.S. the child is the de facto property of the mother, and the father has nothing to say about her property rights.
 
But the point is, she shouldn’t have to. It’s unconscionable to force a child to endure a pregnancy and childbirth that she’s in no way responsible for. There is absolutely no moral right for anyone to do so.
Equally unconscionable would be to force a child to endure an abortion that she’s in no way responsible for, wouldn’t you say?
By the way, I’ve had both - 2 abortions, 1 c-section (my twins). C-section was WAY less traumatic.
 
How much say did the father have in this matter? I don’t know about Brazil, but in the U.S. the child is the de facto property of the mother, and the father has nothing to say about her property rights.
None, and in this case that is quite appropriate as the father in this particular case is obviously a child rapist. Under normal conditions I agree with you completely, but in this specific case the Father forfits his rights, don’t you agree?
 
Equally unconscionable would be to force a child to endure an abortion that she’s in no way responsible for, wouldn’t you say?
By the way, I’ve had both - 2 abortions and 1 C-Section. C-section was WAY less traumatic.
I pray for that little girl.
Wow, it must take some courage to post what you just did. Thank you for providing a fair and accurate appraisal of what is going on here from the perspective of the mother. Incidently, I don’t know where you are personally in your life (emotionally) with those abortions. But if you need assistance finding resources to find healing, please feel free to PM me. And (you don’t list your faith), if you’re a Catholic certainly seek a priest if you haven’t.

God bless, and thanks again for sharing what you did.
 
But you did, you personally feel that there should be an “exception here”… Whether or not you are otherwise profile, you beleive you’ve found a case where you think an abortion is perfectly ok. You are (trying to) using your own private judgement to over rule the Magisterium of the Church which believe it or not, has actually thought through this (and all other moral issues) at a depth which the rest of us don’t even have the time to consider. So I feel confident enough in what I said whether you generally consider your self pro-life, pro-choice or ambivilent (which ultimatly is a pro-choice position).

The genuin pro-life position is this, the direct abortion of a child is never moral under any circomstance. There are no exceptions, a direct abortion is not the right choice. At the same time, all steps should be taken to preserve the health and welfair of the mother to be, and in tragic cases like this we should do our best to remove childeren from environments in which they will be violated.
And I believe you are being extremely naive to think that there would have been no health complications during the pregnancy. If that was my daughter, and she died as a result of attemtping to deliver a child at that young of an age - if someone then tells me that ‘you did the right thing’ - that would ring extremely hollow.
 
… in this specific case the Father forfits his rights, don’t you agree?
Not exactly. I don’t think a parent has “rights” over his child; a parent has authority over his child because he has responsibilities for the child’s well-being. You cannot hold someone responsible while putting up roadblocks that deny him his authority, like granting the mother de facto ownership of the child, as we have done in the U.S. This in no way should be construed to mean that I think a father guilty of rape should get off scott-free.

I think this thread has gotten off-track. It has digressed from the issue of excommunication to an argument over abortion. The Church can excommunicate whoever, if justified according to Canon Law. Accordingly, some here might think the father-rapist should be excommunicated. I’m not sure that’s an excommunicable offense, but it is a matter for civil law.

Another point: Excommunication can be reversed by the excommunicant’s repenting and seeking reconciliation; abortion cannot.
 
So you have to let the danger become imminent? Great idea:thumbsup:
It wasn’t murder but quasi self defence. NB if it can be justified then it isn’t murder by definition.
Yeah, the danger should become imminent before TWO INNOCENT BABIES ARE KILLED.

By your logic, every pregnant woman should just go and have an abortion right now. Both pregnancy and childbirth have risks; why wait until the danger is imminent? 🤷
 
And I believe you are being extremely naive to think that there would have been no health complications during the pregnancy. If that was my daughter, and she died as a result of attemtping to deliver a child at that young of an age - if someone then tells me that ‘you did the right thing’ - that would ring extremely hollow.
Christopher, you *do *recognize that there is a difference between “health complications” and “death,” right?
 
And I believe you are being extremely naive to think that there would have been no health complications during the pregnancy. If that was my daughter, and she died as a result of attemtping to deliver a child at that young of an age - if someone then tells me that ‘you did the right thing’ - that would ring extremely hollow.
My children are grown, but let me tell you as a mother and a Catholic, I would have had the doctors do everything possible to save the lives of my child AND my grandchildren. Not one over the other.

And had my daughter died despite those best efforts, I would have the comfort of knowing that she and other innocents would be safe in the arms of Almighty God and that by NOT allowing myself to sin through procuring an abortion, that I likewise would not be damning myself and separating myself forever from my daughter, and the grandchildren, and Almighty God.

Life is precious, yes. Would I regret having less time to spend with my child? Heavens, yes. But would I ‘bargain’ for a few more ‘earthly years’ at the expense of my immortal soul, possibly of hers as she grew to maturity and perhaps would embrace the culture of death in an attempt to ‘cope’, and condemn innocent babies to death for no fault of their own? No, I would not.
 
And I believe you are being extremely naive to think that there would have been no health complications during the pregnancy. If that was my daughter, and she died as a result of attemtping to deliver a child at that young of an age - if someone then tells me that ‘you did the right thing’ - that would ring extremely hollow.
I didn’t say any such thing, I said quite the oppisite and it was reiterated by wanner47 in post #113. All pregnacies carry risk, this fact alone isn’t enough to justify direct abortion in any case.

By the way, you haven’t directly addressed any of the points I’ve been making.
 
I didn’t say any such thing, I said quite the oppisite and it was reiterated by wanner47 in post #113. All pregnacies carry risk, this fact alone isn’t enough to justify direct abortion in any case.

By the way, you haven’t directly addressed any of the points I’ve been making.
And you seem to be intentionally mitigating the health risks and potential death involved in this particular case.
 
How much say did the father have in this matter? I don’t know about Brazil, but in the U.S. the child is the de facto property of the mother, and the father has nothing to say about her property rights.
None, and in this case that is quite appropriate as the father in this particular case is obviously a child rapist. Under normal conditions I agree with you completely, but in this specific case the Father forfits his rights, don’t you agree?
It was *not *the father who raped the child–it was her stepfather.

Her father was against the abortion. When he and the priests arrived at the hospital, the father was taken away by the social worker and told that his daughter was in danger and so had to have the abortion. He consented under this pressure and lies from the social worker.
 
If the girl died as a result of attempting to carry to term - knowing the additional risks - how is that pro-life?
There is a difference between a natural death and a murder, isn’t there? Pro-life is against the direct and intended taking of innocent human life. Since we all die, pro-life cannot mean being against all death.
 
It was *not *the father who raped the child–it was her stepfather.

Her father was against the abortion. When he and the priests arrived at the hospital, the father was taken away by the social worker and told that his daughter was in danger and so had to have the abortion. He consented under this pressure and lies from the social worker.
St. Frances, the father of the aborted child raped the the 7 year old girl. That is whom I am refering to when I say “the father”. You’ll notice that I have also frequently referred to the 7 year old girl as “the mother” and the 7 year old girls mother as “grandmother” 🙂

Though I do understand how this is confusing to keep track of, I don’t think everyone in this thread has settled on the terminology I have. Sorry for the confussion.
 
And you seem to be intentionally mitigating the health risks and potential death involved in this particular case.
:banghead:

I guess when a persons physician’s professional opinion (upon which they stake their professional reputation and the lives of patients) is rendered null and void when such opinions conflict with your own idology then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top