Exorcise America?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlemagne_III
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think I’ve made few points:
  1. Protestants and others would like the Sacraments to be shown to have an effect, like medicine can. Sacraments have effects part from good will (for example, changing a state of sin into grace when only imperfect contrition is there)
  2. What is it inappropriate with using a Mass for exorcism, since it is most powerful? Could this provide the proof for the Protestants?
 
I think I’ve made few points:
  1. Protestants and others would like the Sacraments to be shown to have an effect, like medicine can. Sacraments have effects part from good will (for example, changing a state of sin into grace when only imperfect contrition is there)
This has nothing to do with the thread, but whatever. Medicine is quantifiable, sacraments are not. As with everyone who thinks faith needs to be verified empirically, they will always and forever be disappointed because sacraments are not physical in nature and therefore cannot be measured scientifically. You also cannot know, apart from faith, if you’ve changed from a state of sin to grace.
  1. What is it inappropriate with using a Mass for exorcism, since it is most powerful? Could this provide the proof for the Protestants?
It is not a matter of “most powerful.” It is a matter of how the Church has determined for handling a given situation. We don’t use the Mass for an exorcism because that is not the purpose of the Mass; the Mass is meant to bring us into direct contact with the body and blood of our savior; not to expel evil spirits from an individual. While it certainly -can- have that affect if God decides for it to, that is not it’s primary purpose. The Rites of Exorcism are what the Church has prescribed, using the authority and guidance promised to her by Christ, to handle instances of possession. I don’t know why you’re looking for “proof” for Protestants; it really doesn’t matter what they think about it since their opinions are just that, opinions, and have no affect on the Holy Spirit’s guidance. Since they won’t accept that Christ gave his authority to a specific Church, and not just some loose amalgamation of unguided individuals prone to flawed personal interpretation, there is no proof that can be given.

I really don’t know what else I can say on the subject.
 
I think I’ve made few points:
  1. Protestants and others would like the Sacraments to be shown to have an effect, like medicine can. Sacraments have effects part from good will (for example, changing a state of sin into grace when only imperfect contrition is there)
  2. What is it inappropriate with using a Mass for exorcism, since it is most powerful? Could this provide the proof for the Protestants?
Have you read your catechism lately?

1673 When the Church asks publicly and authoritatively in the name of Jesus Christ that a person or object be protected against the power of the Evil One and withdrawn from his dominion, it is called exorcism. Jesus performed exorcisms and from him the Church has received the power and office of exorcizing.178 In a simple form, exorcism is performed at the celebration of Baptism. The solemn exorcism, called “a major exorcism,” can be performed only by a priest and with the permission of the bishop. The priest must proceed with prudence, strictly observing the rules established by the Church. Exorcism is directed at the expulsion of demons or to the liberation from demonic possession through the spiritual authority which Jesus entrusted to his Church. Illness, especially psychological illness, is a very different matter; treating this is the concern of medical science. Therefore, before an exorcism is performed, it is important to ascertain that one is dealing with the presence of the Evil One, and not an illness.

I don’t think we need to prove anything to Protestants who have read the bible and the passage in which Jesus gives the apostles the power of exorcising demons.

Mark 3:14-15

“He appointed twelve [whom he also named apostles] that they might be with him and he might send them forth to preach and to have authority to drive out demons.”
 
Well Protestants think Catholics believe in “dead works” because things apart from good intention are believed in: words of a priest cleansing when the contrition itself wasn’t enough, water and words doing to same for baptism, ect.

Now I accept the Sacraments, but I don’t know if there are special prayers that work for exorcism. I know a traditionalist lady who says that prayers now used by exorcists are wrong because they mention Mary, which wasn’t mentioned before, and that the New Mass does not have the same power over demons that the Old Mass does.

So is the argument here being made that the prayers approved by the Church are always the most effective for that period of time until they are reformed?

What of the Luminous Mysteries? Is the rosary stronger with these mysteries?
 
Well Protestants think Catholics believe in “dead works” because things apart from good intention are believed in: words of a priest cleansing when the contrition itself wasn’t enough, water and words doing to same for baptism, ect.
Protestants also believe:

1: Christ was being allegorical when he defined the Eucharist… despite clearly being serious enough about the literal nature of his words to allow several disciples to leave him rather than “clarify” the statement as allegory.

2: Christ didn’t bother providing any central authority to guide his church, and instead decided to let a random group of people assembly a Book of writings sometime three-hundred years after his death, and then let everyone interpret it for themselves, even though they may arrive at different conclusions on important issues.

3: The “real” church mysteriously vanished immediately after his death and then was magically “rediscovered” fifteen hundred years later by a Catholic monk with severe scrupulosity…

… What Protestants believe has about as much impact on Catholicism as a feather has on a mountain.
Now I accept the Sacraments, but I don’t know if there are special prayers that work for exorcism.
Why do you accept the Sacraments?
I’ll assume it’s because you accept that the Church has the authority to define what they are. (If not, then please tell me, why? )

Why, then, do you not accept that the Church also has the authority to define specific prayers for exorcism (especially considering that they define specific, necessary, prayers for all the other sacraments.)
I know a traditionalist lady who says that prayers know used by exorcized are wrong because they mention Mary, which wasn’t mentioned before,
This lady is, strictly speaking, wrong. She doesn’t have the authority, the Church does. I know a “traditionalist” lady who thinks it’s fine to use contraceptives. That doesn’t mean it is. This is why we, unlike Protestants, rely on the authority of the Church, rather than personal opinion; to avoid nonsense like this. Catholics who expound beliefs like this do not have enough trust in Christ’s guidance.
and that the New Mass does not have the same power over demons that Old Mass.
One again, misguided mistrust and a refusal to accept Christ’s promise to protect the Church. Also, a significant lack of understanding of history. The early mass was much closer to the new mass than the Traditional Latin Mass. The form of the mass has changed several times throughout history, the TLM just had the longest uninterrupted run. That doesn’t mean it’s any worse, and in some ways I personally do think it’s better; but both masses are perfectly and completely valid and full. No one mass confers greater graces or has “more power” than the other.
So is the argument here being made that the prayers approved by the Church are always the most effective for that period of time until they are reformed?
As I said before, we cannot judge effectiveness. That is up to God. The reason the church defines certain prayers is because it helps people express themselves clearly. I know that I personally have a hard time praying off the cuff; I turn to defined prayers because they help me express what I am praying about in a clear fashion that I can easily understand and contemplate as I’m praying it. Certain other prayers, such as the Apostle’s Creed or the Rite of Exorcism, have a very specific form for very specific reasons.

With the Apostle’s Creed, you can’t really ad-lib a prayer like that. It is a concise and exact expression of the Christian Faith that cannot be altered without losing some of its truth. With the Rite of Exoricsm, the Church has outlined the prayers to help both the Priest and the individual being possessed. With exorcism, the Priest is literally fighting a spiritual battle against evil in its purest form. This is not some simple prayer reading, it is a deeply troubling and exhaustive experience. (You should read the book that was released recently… I think it’s Called Demons, Deliverance and Discernment; it talks about the strains put on a priest during an exorcism, along with a host of other topics in this vein that you’d probably find pretty fascinating based on this conversation.) The prescribed prayers are there so that the Priest can focus on them and their task completely, rather than having to come up with something on the fly.
What of the Luminous Mysteries? Is the rosary stronger with these mysteries?
The Rosary can’t get stronger, or weaker. It is simply the Rosary. It is exactly as strong as it needs to be, based on God’s discernment of our needs. You really seem to have a flawed understanding of what prayers is… It’s not “I’ll say this many rosaries in exchange for this much grace.” It’s, “Lord, I am opening myself up to you, please send what graces you know I need unto me, and bring me into deeper communion with you.”
 
The Luminous Mysteries sure seem to blur what the Rosary is.
I don’t see how you arrived at this conclusion.

The Rosary is a series of prayers, which help us to focus on the life of Christ. Each decade is punctuated by remembrance of a specific occurrence in His life.

The Joyful Mysteries focus on his incarnation and early childhood.
The Sorrowful Mysteries focus on his Death.
The Glorious Mysteries focus on his glorified life and Resurrection.
The Luminous Mysteries focus on his miracles and ministry.

Just because they came later than the others isn’t a reason to discount them.
 
I don’t think you understand that the sacrifice of the mass serves a different purpose than the rite of exorcism…

The Mass is our partaking of the Christ’s sacrifice, and receiving his body and blood.

The Rite of Exorcism serves a specific purpose, to force a demonic influence out of an individual.

The was a different form of the rite of Exorcism, which was written to cover an entire nation. It is perfectly within the Church’s rights to define these rites and their scopes.

As for why “always had a group of exorcists exorcizing the world every day?”:
#1: This was an extraordinary circumstance which took time and planning to do. It could not happen haphazardly.
#2: Several of the nation’s Bishops came from their respective dioceses to take part, again, not something that can happen without planning, and not something you can do regularly without severely disrupting the Bishop’s ability to tend to the regular needs of their flock.

And, most importantly of all, #3: We do do this every day.

Not with a specific right, mind you, but with the prayers of all the faithful the world over who ask God to have mercy on our world and bring it back to him. There are entire monastic communities who’s devotion is to pray for the world and pray for guidance for the nations within it. The rights of exorcism are, as far as prayers go, extreme forms that are rarely used, and even then only when absolutely necessary. It’s not the Bishops’ job to perform these rights daily, that’s not their purpose. Their job is to lead the Church; the task of shaping our world falls to us far more than it does to them.
Some people enjoy the devil’s influence - they enjoy sin but they also enjoy how the devil makes them feel too. So people will just welcome the demons back in and when they’ve had “enough” they can just run back and be exorcised.
 
I think that’s a great idea. Every day for a year the world’s exorcists from every religion should exorcise the whole world. That would finally produce empirical evidence that exorcism works.

Or not.
Christ only gave the power of exorcism to the apostles, not to every religion.

Surely as a Baptist you know this. :confused:
 
The mexican drug cartels only exist because of the HUGE appetite for these drugs in the US. In my opinion, the US is the real problem, Certain folks in Mexico are surely taking advantage of this, but the real problem(s) lies in the US.
 
Christ only gave the power of exorcism to the apostles, not to every religion.

Surely as a Baptist you know this. :confused:
That’s an even better idea, one religion at a time, I like it. Yes, let’s leave out the Muslim, Hindu, etc. exorcists and only include recognized bona fide qualified Christian exorcists.

Every day for a year they exorcise the whole world, producing not just a better world but empirical evidence to finally prove that exorcism works.

Or not.
 
That’s an even better idea, one religion at a time, I like it. Yes, let’s leave out the Muslim, Hindu, etc. exorcists and only include recognized bona fide qualified Christian exorcists.

Every day for a year they exorcise the whole world, producing not just a better world but empirical evidence to finally prove that exorcism works.

Or not.
Do you doubt that exorcism is a power that can work? Then you would have to doubt Christ.

How would you obtain empirical evidence that it does work?

Why should we require empirical evidence? To prove to unbelievers? Why do we care where unbelievers require evidence? Are you the unbeliever who requires evidence?
 
Christ only gave the power of exorcism to the apostles, not to every religion.

Surely as a Baptist you know this. :confused:
Luke 9:49 50John answered and said, “Master, we saw someone casting out demons in Your name; and we tried to prevent him because he does not follow along with us.” But Jesus said to him, “Do not hinder him; for he who is not against you is for you.”

Do you think Catholics are the only ones Satan likes to torment?

Other religions such as Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Shinto and others have some form of exorcism rituals. One of the best known Judaic rituals, cited in Judaism rabbinical literature dating from the first century AD, concerns the dybbuk, an evil or doomed spirit which possesses a victim and causes mental illness and a personality change. The dybbuk is expelled through the victim’s small toe, and then is either redeemed or sent to hell.

In many Eastern religions spirits and ghosts are blamed for many ills, and are cast out of people. However, such afflictions are not regarded as all-out battles for the persons’ souls. The typical Hindu exorcism practices consist of blowing cow-dung smoke, pressing rock salt between the fingers, burning pig excreta, beating or pulling the victim’s hair, reciting prayers or mantras, and offering gifts of candy and other presents to get the evil or troublesome spirits to depart from the persons.
 
Do you doubt that exorcism is a power that can work? Then you would have to doubt Christ.
The exorcists in Mexico claim it is possible to cast out demons from a very large number of people, most of whom are many miles away from them.

Please quote where in the bible Jesus or any apostle cast out demons from a large number of people who were miles away at the time.
*How would you obtain empirical evidence that it does work?
Why should we require empirical evidence? To prove to unbelievers? Why do we care where unbelievers require evidence? Are you the unbeliever who requires evidence?*
Er, the exorcists believe that it will reduce crime - “if with the power we’ve received from Christ we expel the demons from a country, this will certainly have positive repercussions, because we’ll make a great number of the tempters flee, even if this exorcism is partial”.

So, if it works there will be a drop in crime in Mexico.

And if it would reduce crime, we have to ask why hasn’t the Church been doing it full-time across the globe for the last two thousand years? It would have been a very obvious way to make the world a better place, cast out all demons everywhere and then keep them out. We all know why the Church hasn’t. It would not work.

But when these demons are expelled, where do they flee to? Do they flee from Mexico to the rest of the world, taking a wave of crime elsewhere? Until other exorcists expel the demons from their own countries and the demons flee back to Mexico? Is this the start of an exorcism arms race?

:whacky:
 
The exorcists in Mexico claim it is possible to cast out demons from a very large number of people, most of whom are many miles away from them.

Please quote where in the bible Jesus or any apostle cast out demons from a large number of people who were miles away at the time.

:whacky:
Please show in the bible where the power of exorcism is limited to one person at a time?

If Christ can save the whole world by one act of sacrifice on the cross, why can’t he combat the devil in the same way through exorcism whole nations at a time?

And why isn’t it worth the try? 🤷

It seems you do believe in the power of exorcism. So why is empirical proof relevant?
 
Please show in the bible where the power of exorcism is limited to one person at a time?

If Christ can save the whole world by one act of sacrifice on the cross, why can’t he combat the devil in the same way through exorcism whole nations at a time?

And why isn’t it worth the try? 🤷

It seems you do believe in the power of exorcism. So why is empirical proof relevant?
Interesting you keep questioning the value of evidence when the exorcists themselves are hoping for evidence of “positive repercussions”. But I think I’ll wait patiently for you to first answer my questions before I answer yours. Here they are again:

Where in the bible does Jesus or any apostle cast out demons from a large number of people who were miles away at the time?

If this kind of mass exorcism works (has “positive repercussions”), why hasn’t the Church been doing it full-time across the globe for the last two thousand years?

When these demons are expelled, where do they flee to? Do they flee from Mexico to the rest of the world, taking a wave of crime elsewhere? Until other exorcists expel the demons from their own countries and the demons flee back to Mexico? Is this the start of an exorcism arms race?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top