Extraordinary Ministers

  • Thread starter Thread starter TimOliv
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tim votes for bringing back Subdeacons. Now I just have to sit back and wait for the church to become a total democracy…sits back and starts reading War and Peace
Oh, jolly - democracy in the Catholic Church. Then we can have Latin Mass in the Tridentine style one week, and womyn “priests” fluttering about the Sanctuary the next - and what shall we vote for in the following week? :rolleyes:

(I just escaped from a democratic church - please don’t make me have to go through that again!!)
 
Oh, jolly - democracy in the Catholic Church. Then we can have Latin Mass in the Tridentine style one week, and womyn “priests” fluttering about the Sanctuary the next - and what shall we vote for in the following week? :rolleyes:

(I just escaped from a democratic church - please don’t make me have to go through that again!!)
Flips through notepad while sipping coffee Well the following week we are going to just dabble in some Arianism, and for about a month, we are going to toss aside transubstantiation. I’m opposed to most of these, but people keep sending those petitions…

Oh, and don’t forget the “Same-Sex Marriage Luau” we are having instead of Midnight Mass on Christmas Eve.
 
Of course since speed is the issue in these things, you know Holy Communion has to be over quickly so we can make it over to IHOP before the crowds get there, or to the stadium before kick off, you may need to use more extraordinary ministers to get communion time down to 10 minutes or so which is probably what most churches aim for, and what is probably the real reason for the swarms for Extraordinary Ministers that normally appear.
Isn’t that the sad truth!😦
 
I/ve seen posters claim up to 15 and 16,000amilies. I’m sure its exagerration but hey, it;s the internet right, who can ever really knowt?

Well lets see, I once read of a parish that claimed 21,000 members of which they had a posted wekly Mass average attendance of 6,3000, or a little less than 33%. math is not my strong suit. So lets check your figure. 3500 families, good Catholic families so lets figure 5 to a family, umm 17,500 people sound about right? OK and lets use the same average of Mass attendance of 33% OK, just for argument. So we have a normal weekly Mass attendance of about oh lets say 5,000, because we know that a lot of people and I mean a whole lot only show up for Christmas and Easter. Using your quote of 6 weekend Masses that works out to about 850 per Mass. Lets say that 50 don’t receive. That leaves 800 to receive per mass. .Lets figure that it takes about 5 seconds, and that is a very liberal estimate believe me, to distribute in the hand, standing per person. Thats 12 per minute or 720 per hour per person distributing. My guess is your parish would need two people, a Priest and a Deacon to commune the faithful in less than 30 minutes.👍

Of course since speed is the issue in these things, you know Holy Communion has to be over quickly so we can make it over to IHOP before the crowds get there, or to the stadium before kick off, you may need to use more extraordinary ministers to get communion time down to 10 minutes or so which is probably what most churches aim for, and what is probably the real reason for the swarms for Extraordinary Ministers that normally appear.

We have about 400 elderly who canot be moved, but since most of them are Filipino, their families tend to bring the Host to them in most cases. Lucky I guess. The homebound figure fluctuates but I’d say an average of 15-20 per month. But Father takes care of those saying he feels it is his responsibility as the pastor. Again, I guess we’re lucky.
Your snide remarks about IHOP aside, I’m going to do some number crunching of my own.

We have 6 week-end masses. We CAN’T have any more. The bishop mandates that on Saturdays, masses can not begin before 5pm. So we have a mass at 5 and 6:30. On Sundays, masses have to start in the AM. We have a mass at 7, 8:30, 10 & 11:30. The only place to fit another mass would be at 5:30 and it’s questionable if that would be a good idea since the 7am mass is only about half full. The rest of the masses are filled to capacity with folks even standing in the back.

I have no idea how many people are present at each mass but I can tell you that the choir can get through and entire song during communion. That’s ABOUT four verses and the refrane sung 4 or 5 times. Additionally, they do not start singing right away because the choir receives first so the first few minutes, there is no singing and after the song is done, there is also a few minutes of silence before communion is done.

I have no idea how long that actually is but I would think that it’s at least 10 minutes. If we cut our EMHC in half, we would add about 5-10 minutes to the length of the mass. If we got rid of EMHC all-together, we would add about 10-15 miuntes to the mass – resulting in people coming in late for the next mass by 5-10 minutes when the readings have already begun.
 
I think they should be abolished asap since they are a source of scandal to the weaker.

They are not doing anything intrinsically evil though.

But I think some bishops and pastors like them because they are a concession to protestant and feminist agendas in Church
 
I think they should be abolished asap since they are a source of scandal to the weaker.

They are not doing anything intrinsically evil though.

But I think some bishops and pastors like them because they are a concession to protestant and feminist agendas in Church
I can’t see how.

What is there that is intrinsically either “feminist” or “protestant” about EMHCs?

I have been both a feminist and a protestant in the past, but I never encountered such a thing as an EMHC until I came into the Catholic Church.
 
I can’t see how.

What is there that is intrinsically either “feminist” or “protestant” about EMHCs?

I have been both a feminist and a protestant in the past, but I never encountered such a thing as an EMHC until I came into the Catholic Church.
I can’t speak for the other poster, but maybe he means “protestant” because lay people actually touch the Sacred Body and “feminist” because there seems to be a lot of women who are EMsHC (at my parish, there are more women than men EMHC).

My opinion about this is that if more men would heed the calling to enter the religious life, we wouldn’t have this problem. But many men won’t become a priest because of the sacrifices required. This is truly sad. 😦
 
I can’t speak for the other poster, but maybe he means “protestant” because lay people actually touch the Sacred Body
Um - they always have done. There was a period of time starting at Trent and up until the mid-1960s when lay people touched Him only with their tongues, but I’m not sure how you receive Holy Communion without any physical contact whatsoever. (In any case, I thought that was the whole point of Holy Communion - Jesus materially becoming joined to our bodies.)
and “feminist” because there seems to be a lot of women who are EMsHC (at my parish, there are more women than men EMHC).
Maybe it’s because more women than men can take time off from their work in the middle of the day to do hospital visits.
My opinion about this is that if more men would heed the calling to enter the religious life, we wouldn’t have this problem. But many men won’t become a priest because of the sacrifices required. This is truly sad. 😦
Yes, it is.
 
Abolished is perhaps too harsh of a word. Let me get more specific now that someone has engaged this discussion.

It seems to me that they are getting a bit too big for their britches and no one wants to rope them back in and remind them they are laity.

I see (all too often) Eucharistic Ministers mouthing the words to the consecration and mimicking the priest’s hand movements.

If altar boys started doing this, they’d be reprimanded.

What does everyone else think of this madness?
I am a Eucharisitic Minister. I take it seriously (so much so thatI sometimes feel ill with “nerves”), and I am very conscious that I don’t overstep the bounds of what is appropriate for a lay person to do. I have never seen anything done in an inappropriate manner in any Catholic Church I have attended (in regards to this particular issue). You seem to be calling for greater education of the Eucharisitc Ministers, which is certainly a great idea. I actually think that this service to the Church is an important one, however, and it is one with which I proceed always in reverence and respect.

I suppose we could get rid of all the ministers and leave it to the priest, but I am not sure what this would precisely accomplish–except getting the service over much later. When I make the sign of the cross on a person’s forhead and say a short prayer, is that going too far? Was it too far when I made the sign of the cross over my son with holy water and prayed for his healing late one night? (See my article called “Mysterious Tool” in America, the National Catholic Weekly for an account of this answer to prayer and the nature of miracles.) I think that we all have to do what we believe we are called or asked to do for the Church. If issues akin to legalism get in the way, they need to be overcome.

The bottom line, though, is that service such as this should never be about “self”, but should always point to God. If “self” gets in the way, it seems appropriate to ask the Eucharistic Minister to step down. I can perhaps understand a desire for increased formality in our services, but it seems that it’s rather foolish to turn people away who wish only to find some simple way to serve and honor the Church they love. It should never be about some illusion of power or authority on the part of the Eucharisitc Minister; it’s about trying to express love for one’s fellow man and honor Christ’s atoning sacrifice. If I have honored His sacrifice too much, please correct me.
 
When I make the sign of the cross on a person’s forhead and say a short prayer, is that going too far?
Unless you are ordained with one of the major orders of Deacon, Priest or Bishop; you DID go too far by making the sign of the cross on a person’s forehead and saying a short prayer.
Was it too far when I made the sign of the cross over my son with holy water and prayed for his healing late one night?
No, because as a parent you are allowed to bless your children, grandchildren, etc.
 
There is, perhaps, a better solution. Most of the people who post here KNOW what the rubrics say regarding EMsHC. We also have an understanding of what is best and appropriate in our parishes.

Instead of concerning yourselves with whether or not someone else’s parish uses too many EMsHC, why don’t you concern yourselves with whether or not YOUR parish does? Take the matter up with your pastor, then the bishop, and then Rome if necessary.

I think my parish should have fewer EMsHC at all of the Masses. We usually use 5 to distribute the Host (2 ministers per aisle) and anywhere between 4 and 6 to administer the cup. That’s too many. My parish could easily cut back to 2 minsters for the host on the main aisle, and then one for the other two aisles. Two ministers of the Cup to handle everyone. We would need no more than 5 people total to help Father with Communion.

However, my pastor also has another parish that he is pastor of. Maybe he needs the extra five minutes so he doesn’t need to drive so fast to go from one parish to the next. Maybe he just needs a mental break for five minutes to recharge. Priests are human, after all. Because of this situation and the fact that my parish doesn’t appear to have the usual illicit/gravely abusive tomfoolery that people in this thread claim comes with too many EMsHC, I’m going to trust Father’s judgement. If he feels that he needs nine EMsHC at Mass, that’s fine by me. If one of the rest of you belong to my parish and want to write to the Bishop, feel free, but I’m going to trust Father on this issue. The rest of you, mind your own parishes, please.
 
I am a Eucharisitic Minister. I take it seriously (so much so thatI sometimes feel ill with “nerves”), and I am very conscious that I don’t overstep the bounds of what is appropriate for a lay person to do. I have never seen anything done in an inappropriate manner in any Catholic Church I have attended (in regards to this particular issue). You seem to be calling for greater education of the Eucharisitc Ministers, which is certainly a great idea. I actually think that this service to the Church is an important one, however, and it is one with which I proceed always in reverence and respect.

I suppose we could get rid of all the ministers and leave it to the priest, but I am not sure what this would precisely accomplish–except getting the service over much later. When I make the sign of the cross on a person’s forhead and say a short prayer, is that going too far? Was it too far when I made the sign of the cross over my son with holy water and prayed for his healing late one night? (See my article called “Mysterious Tool” in America, the National Catholic Weekly for an account of this answer to prayer and the nature of miracles.) I think that we all have to do what we believe we are called or asked to do for the Church. If issues akin to legalism get in the way, they need to be overcome.

The bottom line, though, is that service such as this should never be about “self”, but should always point to God. If “self” gets in the way, it seems appropriate to ask the Eucharistic Minister to step down. I can perhaps understand a desire for increased formality in our services, but it seems that it’s rather foolish to turn people away who wish only to find some simple way to serve and honor the Church they love. It should never be about some illusion of power or authority on the part of the Eucharisitc Minister; it’s about trying to express love for one’s fellow man and honor Christ’s atoning sacrifice. If I have honored His sacrifice too much, please correct me.
No, the bottom line is>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

YOU ARE NOT A EUCHARISTIC MINISTER

You are an Extarordinary Minister of Holy Communion… At least be informed enough to know what you are and what you are not. If you don’t believe me, look it up.
 
No, the bottom line is>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

YOU ARE NOT A EUCHARISTIC MINISTER

You are an Extarordinary Minister of Holy Communion… At least be informed enough to know what you are and what you are not. If you don’t believe me, look it up.
If perhaps my vocabulary is not 100% accurate, I would ask your pardon. We are called Eucahristic Ministers at our parish. I am the first to say that I am a new Catholic, so some of the vocabulary nuances may be lost on me. (My family joined a couple of Easters ago when we left the Protestant tradition for the Catholic Church.)

To answer the earlier post, the training that I received on the Eucharisitc Minister ministry was by an ordained deacon who is now finishing his doctorate in Rome. I have served under two priests since his departure–when our last priest was promoted to the Cathedral. The point that I recall in the training was that we were told that it was not appropriate for the ministers to make the sign of the cross in the air, but only on the forhead of the person coming to receive the sacrament. This is how we were told to do it, and this is how those of us in the ministry in our parish carry it out–when someone is not receiving the Body and requests only the blessing.

Unless I am mis-reading the post from Psalm85, you seem angry. I don’t know you, so this puzzles me. If you are indeed angry, the only explanation I can think of is that you are caught up in the legalism of your belief and perhaps have lost touch with the underlying meaning and truth of your faith. There is a Catholic priest who has written some interesting observations concerning the threat of legalism to Christians. If you want the reference, I can try to hunt up the book.

I will try to remember to bring this question up the next time an issue arises, but I think I will stick with the way my church authorities have conveyed and explained the process to me. I am sure you will understand that I trust them far and beyond your opinion–since I don’t know you. Thank you for expressing your concerns, though. It is certainly appreciated!🙂
 
Your snide remarks about IHOP aside, I’m going to do some number crunching of my own.

We have 6 week-end masses. We CAN’T have any more. The bishop mandates that on Saturdays, masses can not begin before 5pm. So we have a mass at 5 and 6:30. On Sundays, masses have to start in the AM. We have a mass at 7, 8:30, 10 & 11:30. The only place to fit another mass would be at 5:30 and it’s questionable if that would be a good idea since the 7am mass is only about half full. The rest of the masses are filled to capacity with folks even standing in the back.

I have no idea how many people are present at each mass but I can tell you that the choir can get through and entire song during communion. That’s ABOUT four verses and the refrane sung 4 or 5 times. Additionally, they do not start singing right away because the choir receives first so the first few minutes, there is no singing and after the song is done, there is also a few minutes of silence before communion is done.

I have no idea how long that actually is but I would think that it’s at least 10 minutes. If we cut our EMHC in half, we would add about 5-10 minutes to the length of the mass. If we got rid of EMHC all-together, we would add about 10-15 miuntes to the mass – resulting in people coming in late for the next mass by 5-10 minutes when the readings have already begun.
Without having numbers on Mass attendance averages, which are readily available from every parish and diocese, your analysis doesn’t stand up to any level of scrutiny. Your observations about there even being people standing in the back doesn’t cut it for analytical purposes.

Many parishes schedule their Masses two to two and 1/2 hours apart to resolve the issue of Masses running late.

I do notice though that you have the entire afternoon free on Sundays. Plenty of time there for one or two more Masses,

OOPS:bigyikes:

I forgot, fall afternoons, Football, got to make it in time for tailgates, kick off and barbeques:thumbsup: 👍 👍

No way to have a Mass in the afternoon huh. .
.
And of course since apparently your community can’t make it to the 7:00am Mass, by your words only half full, we can’t have a 6:00am Mass either.

Looks to me like the Parish you go to is more concerned with their own comforts than anything to do with the Mass.

Sorry, but that is what it looks like. Hope not, but it sure looks like it.
 
In cases of doubt, do as the person who actually has authority over you tells you to do, rather than what a complete stranger on the internet tells you to do.

Also, if you have genuine questions about what you are supposed to do (rather than simply discussion questions for the purpose of seeing what other people think) the best person to ask is your parish priest.
 
If perhaps my vocabulary is not 100% accurate, I would ask your pardon. We are called Eucahristic Ministers at our parish. I am the first to say that I am a new Catholic, so some of the vocabulary nuances may be lost on me. (My family joined a couple of Easters ago when we left the Protestant tradition for the Catholic Church.)

To answer the earlier post, the training that I received on the Eucharisitc Minister ministry was by an ordained deacon who is now finishing his doctorate in Rome. I have served under two priests since his departure–when our last priest was promoted to the Cathedral. The point that I recall in the training was that we were told that it was not appropriate for the ministers to make the sign of the cross in the air, but only on the forhead of the person coming to receive the sacrament. This is how we were told to do it, and this is how those of us in the ministry in our parish carry it out–when someone is not receiving the Body and requests only the blessing.

Unless I am mis-reading the post from Psalm85, you seem angry. I don’t know you, so this puzzles me. If you are indeed angry, the only explanation I can think of is that you are caught up in the legalism of your belief and perhaps have lost touch with the underlying meaning and truth of your faith. There is a Catholic priest who has written some interesting observations concerning the threat of legalism to Christians. If you want the reference, I can try to hunt up the book.

I will try to remember to bring this question up the next time an issue arises, but I think I will stick with the way my church authorities have conveyed and explained the process to me. Thank you for expressing your concerns, though. It is certainly appreciated!🙂
No I;m not angry, I just get frustrated at the abysmal level of knowledge that people have about their faith, who then go and loudly proclaim their ignorance to the world.

As far as what your Parish calls them I don’t really care There are parishes that hold commeorations to the earth mother as well as offering incense to the four cardinal directions prior to Mass. It doesn’t make it right.

As I said, if you think I’m wrong, look it up. At least have enough respect for your faith to use the correct terminolgy for your position.

I will tell you this though, I was an altar boy for a long long time. Before we were even allowed to serve or even enter into the Sanctuary we had to know the name and purpose of everything that was used inthe Mass. We had to know just about everything there was to know about our job, our position, the Priests job and what he was doing. The nameand history of every piece of clothing the Priest wore and its purpose as well as our own… We had to know exactly what we were doing and why… And I was kid. A little boy.

You guys are adults and don’ t care enough about what you are doing to even bother to find out what the name of the position is? To call yourself a Eucharistic Minister is the same as slapping the Priest in the face becuase he is the Eucharistic Minister, not you.
 
I do notice though that you have the entire afternoon free on Sundays. Plenty of time there for one or two more Masses
I don’t know about other parishes, but Sunday afternoons are when we do Baptisms. We often have 5-6 baptisms on any given Sunday afternoon.

We also have community events on Sunday afternoons, such as picnics, prayer and praise, etc. (We had our Back to School picnic last weekend.) Our pastor is really big on community building - it helps bring people out to Mass and gets them interested in learning about the Church. I would say that about 70% of our RCIA Inquirers first found out about us at a Sunday afternoon parish community event. 👍
 
I don’t know about other parishes, but Sunday afternoons are when we do Baptisms. We often have 5-6 baptisms on any given Sunday afternoon.

We also have community events on Sunday afternoons, such as picnics, prayer and praise, etc. (We had our Back to School picnic last weekend.) Our pastor is really big on community building - it helps bring people out to Mass and gets them interested in learning about the Church. I would say that about 70% of our RCIA Inquirers first found out about us at a Sunday afternoon parish community event. 👍
Most places I know of do the baptisms on Saturday afternoons.

Prayer and praise??? Sounds kind of like a Protestant service. I though the Mass was prayer and praise, maybe I’m mistaken. I was unaware that we as Catholics had such things, prayer and praise services, I suppose I’ll have to look in the GIRM for that one.

Yes I agree community picnics, get tohethers and community building are certainly quite important and probably more important than the Sacrifice of the Mass. After all, the community is whats most important…
 
Most places I know of do the baptisms on Saturday afternoons.
We have weddings on Saturdays - sometimes funerals, as well, although most of the time, funerals are done during the week.
Prayer and praise??? Sounds kind of like a Protestant service.
Where do you think the Protestants learned it from? 😉
I though the Mass was prayer and praise, maybe I’m mistaken.
As people in this thread keep pointing out, the Mass is the Solemn Sacrifice of Calvary. Lay people have very little role in it, other than to join their hearts with it in prayer.
I was unaware that we as Catholics had such things, prayer and praise services, I suppose I’ll have to look in the GIRM for that one.
Why would you look in the General Instruction of the Roman Missal for liturgies outside of Mass?
Yes I agree community picnics, get togethers and community building are certainly quite important and probably more important than the Sacrifice of the Mass. After all, the community is whats most important…
Can the sarcasm, please. We have six Masses every weekend, plus at least two every day of the week. Aren’t people ever allowed to do anything fun together? One fun thing during the week, and that’s it, they’re heretics?
 
No I;m not angry, I just get frustrated at the abysmal level of knowledge that people have about their faith, who then go and loudly proclaim their ignorance to the world.

As far as what your Parish calls them I don’t really care There are parishes that hold commeorations to the earth mother as well as offering incense to the four cardinal directions prior to Mass. It doesn’t make it right.

As I said, if you think I’m wrong, look it up. At least have enough respect for your faith to use the correct terminolgy for your position.

I will tell you this though, I was an altar boy for a long long time. Before we were even allowed to serve or even enter into the Sanctuary we had to know the name and purpose of everything that was used inthe Mass. We had to know just about everything there was to know about our job, our position, the Priests job and what he was doing. The nameand history of every piece of clothing the Priest wore and its purpose as well as our own… We had to know exactly what we were doing and why… And I was kid. A little boy.

You guys are adults and don’ t care enough about what you are doing to even bother to find out what the name of the position is? To call yourself a Eucharistic Minister is the same as slapping the Priest in the face becuase he is the Eucharistic Minister, not you.
Well, this particular terminology issue slipped by my radar. After doing some research on the issue, I contacted our parish for more clarification. In our case, it looks as if the term is used infrequently which may have led to my confusion. In regards to the other issues I raised, however, I see nothing suggesting any further change is necessary in how we perform our services. We were trained by a brilliant and remarkably conservative deacon whose explanations I take very seriously.

Even if you’re correct on the “Eucharisitic Minister” vs “Extraordinary Ministers”, the attitude with which you pursued your chastisements betrays something other than goodwill and love of your fellow believer. Perhaps you would do well to reflect a bit less on the structure and order of worship and a bit more on the meaning and truth on which it rests? As I said, legalism is a seriously poor choice for a roomate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top