Extreme unction and anointing of the sick--what's the difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter tori2323
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That’s an interesting viewpoint about the “mental sickness” of being a caregiver. But it’s a new one on me.
Ah well, I’m not the sacraments police, that’s above my pay grade, so I’ll leave it to the priests to decide who should get it. It’s on their head if they make a mistake.
 
Extreme Unction/Anointing of the Sick = New look - same great product! 😆

As long as the matter and form remain intact, the sacrament is valid. Hope this article gives you some good references. Due to the fact that it is “Novus Ordo”, sedevacantists will most likely dismiss it entirely. Try to verify the information independently from the article to make your argument more effective against theirs.

http://www.catholicapologetics.info/thechurch/catechism/Holy7Sacraments-Unction.shtml
 
40.png
phil19034:
Their view is that the illness causes great mental sickness to families, esp the loved ones who are charged with caring for the sick.
‘Stress’ =/= ‘sickness’, though, right?
I don’t know.

I think for the priests who give the Anointment of the Sick to family members, great stress caused by a loved one’s sickness is a “sickness” too.
 
Extreme Unction
Just to mention that you can receive the sacrament of Extreme Unction for a particular illness whereby death could be the likely result. If you receive the sacrament of Extreme Unction for that illness you can not receive it again for that particular illness when you are dying. You do not need to be actively dying to receive this.

Where as the sacrament for the Anointing of the Sick for a particular illness can be received more than once.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top