T
TULIPed
Guest
All good. It’s a good and lively discussion. Carry on 
I think I did–political expediency. Pro-life supporters would alienate almost the entire voting population if they advocated for the logical–as you’ve pointed out–conclusion, punishing the mother.That is the entire reason for the thread in the first place, and one which no one has yet to give an reasonable answer to.
Yes, but why??? I suggested political expediency. It’s certainly not a logical position, as the original poster pointed out.Pro-life organizations uniformly argue for penal measures against abortionists, not women.
Oh, I think you have been given your reasonable answer.So what should the legal sanctions be? That is the question I am asking. And why do so many people who are against abortions feel there should be no legal sanctions against the women who obtain them.
That is the entire reason for the thread in the first place, and one which no one has yet to give an reasonable answer to.
Well…that might put the lie to having the resources and technology to make the death penalty oh so passe.We don’t have enough prisons, for one things.
This is no different than hiring a hit man. They are both equally complicit.I’m not averse altogether to punishing the women who seek out abortions as well as the men who urge them to do so. But they’re just accomplices; the murder is carried out by the “doctors.”
I’m for punishment because it is murder and I support the death penalty because the punishment should be commensurate with the crime.Very interested in how members of the forum would justify their positions for or against punishment, and why or why not punishment should or shouldn’t fit the crime.
So…don’t punish murderers? Or don’t punish female murderers? We’re not talking about their eternal destiny, we’re talking about a crime and whether it should be punished by the state and in what manner.I wonder how Jesus would handle confronting a woman who had an abortion? Let me think…was there ever a time Jesus ran into a sinful woman while he was here…a woman who perhaps felt she was an outcast because of what she had done…maybe even felt shameful about it. Sure would be nice if there was example like that…
There is plea bargaining wherein one can get a reduced sentence by naming co-conspirators.Arresting women who had illegal abortions would serve only to protect illegal abortionists
Murder is not an acceptable way out of a crisis. Punishing murderers is not a lack of compassion.And it demonstrates exactly zero compassion for the unique situation women find themselves in when experiencing a crisis pregnancy.
For getting her pregnant? That’s absurd.And if women are punished for abortions, should the man who impregnated her be punished as an accessory?
The Vatican States did, as well as punish the abortionist. And they were right to do so.when abortion was illegal or restricted in some states, the law did not punish women for obtaining an abortion.
If she is a minor, they should be punished, unless they find her another living arrangement wherein she has provision until her majority. If not, no. Cruelty isn’t necessarily coercion.How about the mother or father who ordered her to have an abortion or be out of the house?
I’m afraid that requires pitchforks and torches and a lot of tar.How about the politicians and judges who made it possible?
That’s not bullying or coercion. It’s being an [expletive redacted]. If her husband or boyfriend told her to drown one their children in the bathtub or he’d leave we all know the proper response and we wouldn’t let her off the hook.Husbands or boyfriends threaten to leave them.
You are absolutely correct. I should’ve been more specific about the interpersonal matter of my comment.we’re talking about a crime and whether it should be punished by the state and in what manner.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.) ShrodingersCat:
Perhaps. Tell that to a host of Muslim-majority countries.For getting her pregnant? That’s absurd.
Heck, that gives me a reason if I am ever arrested for something to self identify as a woman. My chances of getting off go up. See, I knew there was something behind this boy is girl, girl is boy thing.
jimG: “should the man who impregnated her be punished as an acessory?”Did the discussion change to muslims and shariah without me noticing?
I don’t see the relevance.
I don’t believe in beating around the bush.MiserereMeiDei, I do appreciate your candor
It’s animus toward murder and those who commit it, man or woman. Unlike those who want to let people off the hook for murder because they are women, I’m not a sexist.The expression of open animus towards women is refreshing in its honesty
As if justice discredits anything. I think you mean it is distasteful to sexists. I understand.although it does serve to discredit the movement in the eyes of many.
He shall.Long live honesty and truth!