C
clmowry
Guest
I am really not trying to be “judgmental” or “inflammatory” with the following (though I’m sure it will feel that way.)
But…
Do some of you “Faith Alone” folks just simply not read whole books of the bible?
I can understand as “reasonable” and “rational” an argument that:
We are saved by “Faith Alone” BUT “faith without good works is dead and is not therefore ‘saving’ Faith”.
But to make the claim that “good works” are in no way “required” for salvation is so “obviously” unbiblical that I’m lead to conclude that either you simply do not read “all” of scripture or that you are being intellectually dishonest (though perhaps just with yourself.)
I prefer not to believe anyone is being intentionally dishonest, so back to the original question.
Do you just stick with the books/verses that support your theological position and simply ignore the rest?
There must be a hundred New Testament verses that point towards the necessity of “works” in very explicit terms.
Yet some folks maintain that the necessity of good works in the life of the “elect” is something that the Catholic Church is making up.
Above someone even goes so far as to imply that believing in the necessity of good works is evidence of a lack of faith, or a poor faith. That if we had (real) “humble faith” we would go to Christ with “nothing” to offer.
I really do not get how a reasonable person can read the bible and come anywhere close to concluding that good works are not somehow a necessary part of “saving faith”.
This is one of the reason why I think that those who claim that we can get everything we need to know concerning faith and morals out of the bible alone, all by ourselves, are simply deluding themselves.
But to come to the conclusion that good works are somehow a demonstration of a lack of faith is so far from the truth “obviously” expressed in scripture that it just blows my mind that someone making that claim could have ever actually read “all” of the bible (even once.)
So would somebody that takes the hard line stance that “good works are absolutely not necessary in the life of the elect” explain it to me like I’m a 2 year old.
Cause I just do not get it.
(Hopefully the rhetoric involved in defending “faith alone” is simply leading me to misunderstand the position some of you are taking.)
Chuck
But…
Do some of you “Faith Alone” folks just simply not read whole books of the bible?
I can understand as “reasonable” and “rational” an argument that:
We are saved by “Faith Alone” BUT “faith without good works is dead and is not therefore ‘saving’ Faith”.
But to make the claim that “good works” are in no way “required” for salvation is so “obviously” unbiblical that I’m lead to conclude that either you simply do not read “all” of scripture or that you are being intellectually dishonest (though perhaps just with yourself.)
I prefer not to believe anyone is being intentionally dishonest, so back to the original question.
Do you just stick with the books/verses that support your theological position and simply ignore the rest?
There must be a hundred New Testament verses that point towards the necessity of “works” in very explicit terms.
Yet some folks maintain that the necessity of good works in the life of the “elect” is something that the Catholic Church is making up.
Above someone even goes so far as to imply that believing in the necessity of good works is evidence of a lack of faith, or a poor faith. That if we had (real) “humble faith” we would go to Christ with “nothing” to offer.
I really do not get how a reasonable person can read the bible and come anywhere close to concluding that good works are not somehow a necessary part of “saving faith”.
This is one of the reason why I think that those who claim that we can get everything we need to know concerning faith and morals out of the bible alone, all by ourselves, are simply deluding themselves.
But to come to the conclusion that good works are somehow a demonstration of a lack of faith is so far from the truth “obviously” expressed in scripture that it just blows my mind that someone making that claim could have ever actually read “all” of the bible (even once.)
So would somebody that takes the hard line stance that “good works are absolutely not necessary in the life of the elect” explain it to me like I’m a 2 year old.
Cause I just do not get it.
(Hopefully the rhetoric involved in defending “faith alone” is simply leading me to misunderstand the position some of you are taking.)
Chuck