Faith Alone

  • Thread starter Thread starter Timmy_Z
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
James posted this on the other thread (about Mary).

To me he here illustrates the difficulty of the RC view of justification. Constant failings that lead us to damnation until penance. All my Evangelical eyes read is working to attain the attainable.

God simply calls us to be too holy. It is impossible. Being cloaked in Christ’s righteousness seems to be our (well at least my) only chance.

This is probably my biggest theological problem with the RCC. Try as I might, I do not believe any of me (my works, nature, efforts, etc…) can stand before God and His righteous throne on judgement day. I plan to hide behind Christ and his work.

Thanks,
Tim
Yes. However, not “hide behind” Him, but in that day being fully revealed “in Him” - “made righteous” (2 Cor. 5:21; Rom. 5:17,19; cf. 1 Jn. 3:1-3; Col. 3:4).

And I’ll be standing there with you, Timmy, rejoicing (with Paul) as one who counted his own efforts (personal & religious) to attain righteousness as pure “rubbish” in order to have gained Christ (through faith alone); and on that day found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own, derived from law (any principle of law, religious or otherwise), but that which is through faith in Christ (alone), the righteousness which comes from God (i.e., reckoned) on the basis of FAITH. Not through water baptism or any so-called “righteous works” done through me, but like Abraham our father, having believed God’s word gifted righteousness (justification) by His grace through (sacramentalism? No!, works? No!, religious or church affiliation? No! but…) "the redemption which is in Christ Jesus" (Rom. 3:24). IOW, “Christ alone” (Gen. 6:15; Rom. 3:22; 4:1-5; Phil. 3:8-9).

I agree with you that this is the biggest theological problem with divine salvation and the RCC, as well as any person or religious institution which fail to fully embrace the Apostolic message of salvation by divine grace through faith in Christ and His redemptive work on the cross alone.

According to divine revelation salvation requires nothing less than divine righteousness which is gifted by God upon belief in His Son. And the true believer rejoices in the fact that “the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable” (Rom. 11:29).
 
Hebrews is an apologetic argument for the supremacy of the fulfillment of God’s promises in Christ. It is addressed to the gathered church, which contains both believers, and unbelievers.

Because of that, those who preach God’s word must announce both the promises of God, and His warnings, as they do not have the ability to see into the hearts of men thereby identifying true saving faith.

The work of the Spirit causes the promises to be joyfully embraced in the heart of the believer. The warnings are used by God both to exhort the saved, and to pronounce judgment on the hypocrites.

The essential message of the whole epistle is that Christ is the fulfillment of the promises of God in the Old Testament, such that, there is nothing to “go back to.”

The old way is gone, and those who leave the church to return to the “old way” are so offensive to God that He abandons them to their ways, and He is finished with them.

They have, the writer states, “again crucified Christ.”

IOW, after weighing the claims of the Christ, and His Gospel, they have themselves become a Sanhedrin, pronouncing Christ guilty, and handing Him over to Pilate insisting that He be crucified—that’s the comparison of their leaving.

They had seen the miracles and signs first-hand (2:4), they had received the Gospel from the mouths of the apostles, and finally, after a time of deliberation, they rejected the truth; what further reasoning, or explanation on the part of God need be offered to them.

The ones described in Hebrews 6 are fully, and finally abandoned by God; therefore, they were never Christ’s.

I know this because the Lord Himself says that His sheep hear His voice, and He knows them, and they follow Him, and He gives eternal life to them, and they will never perish.

The only way in which they “lost salvation,” is that when the opportunity for believing the Gospel was presented to them, they rejected it.

Any future opportunity for repentance is not available to them from God forever.
Excellent post! 👍
 
Catholic Dude:
The context of that Rom 8 quote is “all things work together for good for those who love God”. This is not a one time love, but a persevering in love.

Mat 23 12Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, 13but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.

This verse totally contradicts Calvinism because the dont believe a person’s love can “grow cold” and cause them to not be saved.
That assumes your position.

We’ve established that in RC, and Calvinist predestination those predestined to glory do not fail, and those do love God.
 
Sean Boyle:
If you claim to be “of Calvin” that’s fine, free will lead you there. The believer’s in Christ’s Church are “of Christ” and no one else. Calvin was just a man, his beliefs were his own. His authority was self professed. Prove that his preachings were all correct. Prove that his beliefs are not fading away. Prove that he was saved. Prove that he was predestined to be saved. Prove that the letters of Paul which Calvin takes out of context are to be understood as this man Calvin did. Prove that Calvin was guided by the Holy Spirit to more of a degree than me or any other Catholic faithful person.

What you say, there is no proof of any of those things. Then preach Christ instead!
Calvin preached only Christ, as do I.
 
40.png
JoeyWarren:
If you think so highly of Calvin, then why do you not accept his view on Mary and her Perpetual Virginity?
If you think so highly of Calvin’s teaching concerning Mary then why do reject his soteriology? :ehh:

Calvin has no claim on my salvation, nor what I am to believe. Neither Calvin, nor anyone else has been given the authority to bind my conscience with respect to my beliefs; what I am to believe is contained in the written scriptures, it is easily understood for those taught by the Spirit of Christ, and that is my guide.

I agree with Calvin’s soteriology because it is biblical.

Calvin was a Catholic; Calvin was concerned with the important issues of who God is, who Christ is and what did He accomplish, who is man, and how is fallen man made right before God; Mary has nothing to do with those things.
 
40.png
Gamera:
Didn’t Calvin espouse the notion of “total depravity” – the proposition that fallen humanity is utterly devoid of any goodness?
Devoid of any goodness? No.

The idea of depravity relates to ones ability to please God, and to make himself right with God—man is completely unable to do so.

That’s not a mistrust of man, but an honest and biblical assessment of a fallen man’s condition.
 
Calvin preached only Christ, as do I.
IMHO, no you don’t.

Getting back on topic and “if” your quote were something to contemplate as a christian. Where is it stated by Christ in the gospel that “Faith Alone” is all that is needed.
 
However one comes to Faith, one quickly realizes that good works are fundamental to living that faith.

Once you believe that Jesus is Lord - that Jesus died for our sin(s) - that whoever is sincerely contrite can leave those sin(s) at the foot of the cross – and proclaim that “Jesus is Lord” is then through the grace of God …saved
When one decides to follow Jesus, one must then work towards this (following) every day of their life (certain to fall very short & often convicted themselves by the words of our Lord) yet one must keep at this **unachievable **goal (lest any man should boast) … you must “work”… until the race is run.

Although I am catholic I enjoy many Christian authors…to paraphrase C.S Lewis…
Christians continually bicker on what it is that leads us home to the Lord… is it good works… or faith in Christ alone … yet it does seem to me like asking which blade in a pair of scissors is most necessary?
 
However one comes to Faith, one quickly realizes that good works are fundamental to living that faith.

Once you believe that Jesus is Lord - that Jesus died for our sin(s) - that whoever is sincerely contrite can leave those sin(s) at the foot of the cross – and proclaim that “Jesus is Lord” is then through the grace of God …saved
When one decides to follow Jesus, one must then work towards this (following) every day of their life (certain to fall very short & often convicted themselves by the words of our Lord) yet one must keep at this **unachievable **goal (lest any man should boast) … you must “work”… until the race is run.

Although I am catholic I enjoy many Christian authors…to paraphrase C.S Lewis…
Christians continually bicker on what it is that leads us home to the Lord… is it good works… or faith in Christ alone … yet it does seem to me like asking which blade in a pair of scissors is most necessary?
Catholicism is best understood as the whole pair of scissors. The bickering comes in when “well meaning protestants” claim that only one blade is necessary to make the whole scissors. They claim one, Catholics claim both. Thus the bickering. We can’t both be right. Catholic seek to correct the flaw in faith which separated the two blades commonly called the reformation.

We all know it takes both.

Protestants try to claim only one blade is need, to justify their separation from the one True Chruch.
 
Catholicism is best understood as the whole pair of scissors. The bickering comes in when “well meaning protestants” claim that only one blade is necessary to make the whole scissors. They claim one, Catholics claim both. Thus the bickering. We can’t both be right. Catholic seek to correct the flaw in faith which separated the two blades commonly called the reformation.

We all know it takes both.

Protestants try to claim only one blade is need, to justify their separation from the one True Chruch.
👍 That’s right. (we are in agreement)

So why can’t they (Protestanats) see the whole pair of scissors?
 
We’ve established that in RC, and Calvinist predestination those predestined to glory do not fail, and those do love God.
No, there are siginificant similarities in our two views, but only the Catholic view harmonizes Scripture. Calvinism cannot accept that some do not persevere and are damned. The concept of a Christian’s love “growing cold” doesnt fit in your theology.
 
Ott states that as a Catholic, you are required to believe the following De fide:God, by His eternal resolve of will, has predetermined certain men to eternal blessedness (De fide)

And that,

God, by an eternal resolve of His will, predestines certain men, on account of their foreseen sins, to eternal rejection (De fide).Which one of you Catholics am I to believe?
I gave you the proper references on salvation from the CCC that are the required teachings to believe. What you quoted are snippets of theological essays that don’t include the whole meaning which is typical of sola scripturalists. They look into the teachings of other religions like they do their bible…only looking for what suits their arguments even if they have to take it out of context to do it. Don’t try to teach me Catholicism. You haven’t even learned Christianity yet.
 
40.png
steppenwolf1218:
I gave you the proper references on salvation from the CCC that are the required teachings to believe. What you quoted are snippets of theological essays that don’t include the whole meaning which is typical of sola scripturalists.
I’ve shown you what you are required to believe; whether or not you embrace what you’re required to believe is your choice.
40.png
steppenwolf1218:
They look into the teachings of other religions like they do their bible…only looking for what suits their arguments even if they have to take it out of context to do it. Don’t try to teach me Catholicism. You haven’t even learned Christianity yet.
I’ve shown you what you are required to believe; whether or not you embrace what you’re required to believe is your choice.
 
Catholic Dude:
No, there are siginificant similarities in our two views, but only the Catholic view harmonizes Scripture. Calvinism cannot accept that some do not persevere and are damned.
I understand that those who are not elect persevere in only one thing—their rebellion.

Where in Sacred Writ is a statement that describes the group that Catholics claim God predestined to grace only—He foreknew them, predestined them to grace, called and justified them, and then lets many of them lose their justification and be condemned to hell? Where is that stated?
Catholic Dude:
The concept of a Christian’s love “growing cold” doesnt fit in your theology.
Sure it does; it’s written in scripture.

It’s clear from v13 that the elect will be saved; they are given the gift of perseverance by God.
 
Sean Boyle:
Getting back on topic and “if” your quote were something to contemplate as a christian. Where is it stated by Christ in the gospel that “Faith Alone” is all that is needed.
**Habakkuk 2:4

“Behold, as for the proud one, His soul is not right within him; But the righteous will live by his faith.

Galatians 3:11

Now that no one is justified by the Law before God is evident; for, “The righteous man shall live by faith.”

Hebrews 10:38

But My righteous one shall live by faith; And if he shrinks back, My soul has no pleasure in him.

Romans 3:28

For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.**
 
I understand that those who are not elect persevere in only one thing—their rebellion.
NO, they dont persevere in their rebellion. There was a time when they were saved, they had Christian love, otherwise they cant have love “grow cold” if it never was ‘hot’.
Where in Sacred Writ is a statement that describes the group that Catholics claim God predestined to grace only—He foreknew them, predestined them to grace, called and justified them, and then lets many of them lose their justification and be condemned to hell? Where is that stated?
Sure it does; it’s written in scripture.
It’s clear from v13 that the elect will be saved; they are given the gift of perseverance by God.
In your theology only those justified can truly love, thus those whose love “grows cold” must have been justified.
Other passages like Mat 18:23-35 show saved individuals being damned. The only conclusion is that these people were saved yet failed to persevere. This is the proper way of interpreting Scripture, taking it as a whole.
 
NO, they dont persevere in their rebellion. There was a time when they were saved, they had Christian love, otherwise they cant have love “grow cold” if it never was ‘hot’.

In your theology only those justified can truly love, thus those whose love “grows cold” must have been justified.
Other passages like Mat 18:23-35 show saved individuals being damned. The only conclusion is that these people were saved yet failed to persevere. This is the proper way of interpreting Scripture, taking it as a whole.
Again, you assume that your position is correct.

I have demonstrated that two groups exist—those elect to salvation, and the non-elect (Rom 8:30; 9:22-23; Jn 3:39; 1 Pet 2:8 etc.).

You claim that a third group exists, but you have yet to support that from scripture; instead, you take words that stir your emotions, and attach the meaning “loss of salvation” to all of them. 🤷

**Where in Sacred Writ is a statement that describes the group that Catholics claim God predestined to grace only—He foreknew them, predestined them to grace, called and justified them, and then lets many of them lose their justification and be condemned to hell?

Where is that stated?**
 
Again, you assume that your position is correct.

I have demonstrated that two groups exist—those elect to salvation, and the non-elect (Rom 8:30; 9:22-23; Jn 3:39; 1 Pet 2:8 etc.).

You claim that a third group exists, but you have yet to support that from scripture; instead, you take words that stir your emotions, and attach the meaning “loss of salvation” to all of them. 🤷

Where in Sacred Writ is a statement that describes the group that Catholics claim God predestined to grace only—He foreknew them, predestined them to grace, called and justified them, and then lets many of them lose their justification and be condemned to hell?

Where is that stated?
Are you saying that we are not saved by grace alone?
 
Again, you assume that your position is correct.

I have demonstrated that two groups exist—those elect to salvation, and the non-elect (Rom 8:30; 9:22-23; Jn 3:39; 1 Pet 2:8 etc.).

You claim that a third group exists, but you have yet to support that from scripture; instead, you take words that stir your emotions, and attach the meaning “loss of salvation” to all of them. 🤷

Where in Sacred Writ is a statement that describes the group that Catholics claim God predestined to grace only—He foreknew them, predestined them to grace, called and justified them, and then lets many of them lose their justification and be condemned to hell?

Where is that stated?
Those verses you gave dont say there are only two groups, the Bible (taken as a whole) says there are those who are never saved, those who are saved but fail to persevere, and those that are saved and persevere.

A few other passages, besides the ones I have already given, that come to mind are:
I Cor 10 1For I do not want you to be ignorant of the fact, brothers, that our forefathers were all under the cloud and that they all passed through the sea. 2They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea. 3They all ate the same spiritual food 4and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ. 5Nevertheless, God was not pleased with most of them; their bodies were scattered over the desert. 6Now these things occurred as examples to keep us from setting our hearts on evil things as they did. 7Do not be idolaters, as some of them were; as it is written: “The people sat down to eat and drink and got up to indulge in pagan revelry.” 8We should not commit sexual immorality, as some of them did—and in one day twenty-three thousand of them died. 9We should not test the Lord, as some of them did—and were killed by snakes. 10And do not grumble, as some of them did—and were killed by the destroying angel.
11These things happened to them as examples and were written down as warnings for us, on whom the fulfillment of the ages has come. 12So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall!
The people being set free from Egypt is equivalent to a Christian being set free from the bondage of sin in their former life. Their sojourn in the desert represents our life of struggle against sin. Yet many of the Israelites did not remain faithful at various points along the way and fell to their death. Paul says this is a warning to us. If it is impossible to fall then this “warning” is not a warning.
Luke 8 11"This is the meaning of the parable: The seed is the word of God. 12Those along the path are the ones who hear, and then the devil comes and takes away the word from their hearts, so that they may not believe and be saved. 13Those on the rock are the ones who receive the word with joy when they hear it, but they have no root. They believe for a while, but in the time of testing they fall away. 14The seed that fell among thorns stands for those who hear, but as they go on their way they are choked by life’s worries, riches and pleasures, and they do not mature. 15But the seed on good soil stands for those with a noble and good heart, who hear the word, retain it, and by persevering produce a crop.
This explicitly says there are more than two groups, and that there are groups that believe for a time but fall away and dont persevere.
II Peter 1
5For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; 6and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; 7and to godliness, brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness, love. 8For if you possess these qualities in increasing measure, they will keep you from being ineffective and unproductive in your knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. 9But if anyone does not have them, he is nearsighted and blind, and has forgotten that he has been cleansed from his past sins.
10Therefore, my brothers, be all the more eager to make your calling and election sure. For if you do these things, you will never fall,
Here in verse 9 is a person cleansed from their sins but is not persevering in good works.

Again, the Catholic position is taking Scripture as a whole. Those passages I listed above present severe problems to your theology, especially Lk 8:13 and 2 Pt 1:9.

Im not assuming my position is correct and this can be proven by the fact you have no explanation for passages like “love grows cold”. The term “persevere” means nothing in your theology because the concept of failing doesnt exist, thus the concept of persevering doesnt exist.
If someone is on the edge of a cliff the possibility of falling exists, thus they must persevere in keeping their balance so they dont fall off the cliff. In your theology it would be as if you are standing on flat ground and saying you will never fall, well of course because the concept of falling doesnt exist, you are not persevering.
 
Catholicism is best understood as the whole pair of scissors. The bickering comes in when “well meaning protestants” claim that only one blade is necessary to make the whole scissors.
If salvation was truly a two party, cooperative effort then the analogy of the scissors would be correct (one blade divine, the other human). However, salvation, justification, righteousness and eternal life are all revealed to be gifted by God to the sinner upon belief in the Son (Rom. 3:24; 5:17; 6:23; Eph. 2:8-9). And it is revealed that the gifts of God are “irrevocable” (Rom. 11:29, NASB, RSV, NIV); “without repentance” (KJV); “never taken back” (Williams); “God never changes His mind” (Beck).Rom 3:24 "being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus;"The English word “gift” being the Greek word “dorean,” meaning “without cause.” IOW, because of the redemptive work of Christ on the cross God is “free” to forever justify the one who turns from unbelief to belief in His Son.Rom 4:22 - 5:2 “Therefore it was also credited to Him (Abraham) as righteousness. Now not for his sake only was it written that it was credited to him, but for our sake also, to whom it will be credited, as those who believe in Him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead, {He} who was delivered over because of our transgressions, and was raised because of our justification. Therefore, having been justified by faith (not “by baptism”), we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have obtained our introduction by faith (not “by baptism”) into this grace in which we stand; and we exult in hope of the glory of God.”
Catholicism is best understood as the whole pair of scissors.
True, the scissors analogy certainly conforms to RC soteriology, but not that of Divine revelation.
We can’t both be right.
Agreed!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top