F
foundthelight
Guest
Please forgive me for getting us off the topic of Romans.
I think you are taking the Protestant view, namely that if Protestants are right then the Church is wrong. Wheras the Catholic teaching is that the fullness of truth subsists in the Catholic church, and elements of truth are found in other churches.For those of you who think that I am taking a protestant view of it, you are mistaken. I do not believe in total depravity and I do believe in the Catholic teaching that we are sanctified and made worthy of heaven by Grace through faith. This requires our participation with God by yielding to his grace but most of all in having FAITH in GOD that HE can literally CHANGE us! This is not so far fetched if you believe in GRACE and have FAITH in GOD. We can not change ourselves only God can but we must let him.
However in the book of Romans, Paul does not mention Faith and works but ONLY faith.
Are you purposely ignoring Romans 2:6-11 or did you miss post #15?However in the book of Romans, Paul does not mention Faith and works but ONLY faith.
[God] will repay everyone according to his works: eternal life to those who seek glory, honor, and immortality through perseverance in good works, but wrath and fury to those who selfishly disobey the truth and obey wickedness. Yes, affliction and distress will come upon every human being who does evil, Jew first and then Greek. But there will be glory, honor, and peace for everyone who does good, Jew first and then Greek.There is no partiality with God.
We are saved by the grace of God and are justified/regenerated by His grace in order to perform good works, and by these works we shall be judged:Let’s take all of the books in context shall we? The entire book of Galatians, Romans, Ephesians and Colossians speaks of not relying on works for salvation.
The book of James is talking about people who only give lip service to their faith. Yes, we are to have works but we are saved FOR good works not BY good works.
"I would not work my soul to save,
For that, the Lord has done.
But I would work like any slave
for love of God’s dear Son."
Rubbish. They are largely addressing the controversy between the Judaizers and the early Church on the necessity of keeping the perscriptions of the old Law.Let’s take all of the books in context shall we? The entire book of Galatians, Romans, Ephesians and Colossians speaks of not relying on works for salvation.
More rubbish. He is talking to saved Christians about salvation and the necessity of works in that salvation. That’s why he use the examples of Abraham and Rahab. They were saved both by their faith AND their works along with that faith. These works are performed, not in our own power, but by God’s grace.The book of James is talking about people who only give lip service to their faith.
oops sorry. Yes this is good evidence of being judged by works by God in Romans.Are you purposely ignoring Romans 2:6-11 or did you miss post #15?
ok back to the originally scheduled programI need a Catholic bible with good commentary. my NAB has pretty sparse and vague notes. any suggestions?
haydock1859.tripod.com/index.htmlshort commercial break…
ok back to the originally scheduled program![]()
AWESOME!! Thanks
Bravo Fidelis, that is an excellent passage. I would also toss in the following that I didn’t see with a skim of this thread.Are you purposely ignoring Romans 2:6-11 or did you miss post #15?
WHO said Christ’s merits had nothing to do with Abraham or any other Christian being justified?I have a new question that actually came to me during mass as i looked upon the crucifix.
What did Jesus’ Death purchase for us? If Abraham was justified by his faith and works aside from Jesus’ death on the Cross, is it possible that just by faith in God and our works we can be justified?
Romans 5:21-22 :bible1:What did Jesus’ Death purchase for us? If Abraham was justified by his faith and works aside from Jesus’ death on the Cross, is it possible that just by faith in God and our works we can be justified?
That was excellent! I have to remind myself that christ’s sacrifice was eternal. I always remember the future tense of eternal but sometimes i forget the past tense.Romans 5:21-22 :bible1:
[21] fully convinced that God was able to do what he had promised.
[22] That is why his faith was “reckoned to him as righteousness.”
[23] But the words, “it was reckoned to him,” were written not for his sake alone,
[24] but for ours also. It will be reckoned to us who believe in him that raised from the dead Jesus our Lord,
[25] who was put to death for our trespasses and raised for our justification.
Abraham’s faith was reckoned to him as righteousness because he fully believed that God would keep His promises. But if, as you suggest, God did not keep his promise through Jesus’ death on the cross, then the whole thing falls apart. Follow along through Romans 5:21-25 backwards step by step.
RESULT: Abraham’s justification and ours flows from God keeping his promise through the death and resurection of his Son. What if that death and resurection never happened?
- Jesus was “put to death for our trespasses and raised for our justification.”
- Which is why we have “rightiousness reckoned to us who believe”
- That applies to Abraham as much as it does to us.
- The whole reason Abraham had his “faith reckoned as rightiousness…”
- …was because God was trustworthy in “fufiling His promises.”
RESULT: Abraham is NOT justified, we are NOT justified and God is NOT trustworthy if Jesus did NOT die on the cross.
- Jesus was NOT “put to death for our trespasses and raised for our justification.”
- Which is why we do NOT have “rightiousness reckoned to us who believe”
- That applies to Abraham as much as it does to us.
- The whole reason Abraham did NOT have his faith reckoned as rightiousness…
- …was because God was NOT trustworthy in fufiling His promises.
How blessed are we that Christ realy and truly did die for atonement of our sins and of the whole world, including Abraham.![]()