M
The columnist who wrote this article is one of the editors of the Boston Globe.I am frankly astonished that the Globe would even print this story; though the work they did in exposing the terrible clerical abuse in the Boston archdiocese was necessary, the Globe has had an anti-Catholic bent for a long time.
Remember, though, this is an opinion article. Op-eds, by their nature, tend not to be objective.It sounds as if Garabedian was so caught up in pursuing bad guys that he couldn’t recognize an unjust accusation. So sorry for this good priest.
The fact that the writer is one of the editors makes it all the more astonishing, considering the Globe’s history. I’m well familiar with opinion pieces, as my husband is a journalist.The columnist who wrote this article is one of the editors of the Boston Globe.
Remember, though, this is an opinion article. Op-eds, by their nature, tend not to be objective.
That said, its very sad when someone is falsely accused. To have it happen twice in the space of a few years would be awful.
Well, that’s not quite true. Clients attest to complaints and lawyers swear that they have investigated the facts and the law and that both are applied accurately.If there was any justice in this country, everything this attorney brought from now on would be tainted by these actions. Yet I know, that lawyers, unlike police, get a free pass on such actions from their own who later become judges.
Was is Esther 1:13?I believe there is something in the Bible regarding lawyers and this must definately be an example of the type so menioned.
Or maybe Titus 3:13?He conferred with the wise men versed in the law, because the king’s business was conducted in general consultation with lawyers and jurists.
Send Zenas the lawyer and Apollos on their journey soon, and see to it that they have everything they need.
Thanks for slandering an entire profession in one fell swoop.If there was any justice in this country, everything this attorney brought from now on would be tainted by these actions. Yet I know, that lawyers, unlike police, get a free pass on such actions from their own who later become judges.
On the same patient at two different times? Yes.Should we kick out every doctor who has ever made two surgical errors?
Just a slight note of contention; it is not at all clear in this verse or in it’s context that Zenas is being sought for professional help, Apollos is not necessarily a lawyer.Was is Esther 1:13?
Or maybe Titus 3:13?
I’ve read nothing that says he should be. Nor anything showing him to be a ‘predatory’ lawyer.On the same patient at two different times? Yes.
I don’t know if this lawyer should be disbarred or anything like that, …
Punishment because he was wrong and refused to admit it? That’s not reasonable.but I do think that his, um, errors regarding this priest should be made well known to everyone. Not just his error, but his refusal to admit that he was wrong. I think that there should be some punishment.
I can answer that: A doctor would be punished not at all.How would he/she be punished for those errors? Should the lawyer not face the same punishment?
That’s a leap.After all, by all accounts his actions at least contributed to the death of the priest.
Yep. Because he was wrong. AND he won’t admit it. Consequences for one’s actions.Punishment because he was wrong and refused to admit it? That’s not reasonable.
To quote an attorney, “That’s a leap.”I can answer that: A doctor would be punished not at all.