Favor factory? Huma emails ...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Theo520
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
7_Sorrows said:
I guess no one is entitled to take the others seriously either then.
Click to expand...
Others’s what? All people should be taken seriously, but their words should be taken seriously when there is something behind the words; not just because they uttered the words.
 
dvdjs said:
Others’s what? All people should be taken seriously, but their words should be taken seriously when there is something behind the words; not just because they uttered the words.
Click to expand...
In other words you don’t think he knows what he is talking about.
 
dvdjs said:
Yes. Directly responding to your remark that “there are others who beg to differ”.

I have no doubt that there are many who would like to ge Mueller IIi and his team out of the picture,

and will use most anything as see what sticks. Thus far, no sticking.
Click to expand...
You could get another prosecutor.
 
josie_L said:
You could get another prosecutor.
Click to expand...
Then why haven’t they (team trump) made a motion to recuse?

They have that right.

But trump prefers to go on fox and friends (etc) to say there is a problem with conflict of interest.

Ty Cobb, the new attorney on team trump, thinks very “highly of Mueller”.

Rosenstein appointed him. He didn’t think it was a conflict.

And, the theory that Comey and Mueller are besties hasn’t been established as fact It was put forth originally by Breitbart. Apparently they have never visited each other’s homes and have gone out to dinner once or twice during the course of the many years That’s the extent of their “friendship” .

But if team Trump seriously has issues, let him bring them up through a formal recusal request.

Trump acted similarly with judge Curiel. He didn’t request for Curiel to recuse either. He just complained about him.
 
Theo520 said:
So what you are saying is that the person in charge shouldn’t held accountable for what their immediate subordinates do, unless you can find the paper trail of explicit instructions.
Click to expand...
Accountable, but not criminally accountable. Removal from office, but not imprisonment.
 
josie_L said:
Oh, please, do continue rolling your eyes, while congressmen have voted to have a special counsel to investigate the likes of Clinton, Comey, Lynch, Rice and Obama.
Click to expand...
Congressmen have voted on lots of things that have no substance. They are politicians, you know.
 
josie_L said:
These politicians HAVE substance.
Click to expand...
I am sure that all thing politicians that agree with them are the best, at least until they aren’t, yet politicians they remain. The point remains, congressmen voting on a thing does not is hardly evidence.
 
pnewton said:
I am sure that all thing politicians that agree with them are the best, at least until they aren’t, yet politicians they remain. The point remains, congressmen voting on a thing does not is hardly evidence.
Click to expand...
There is evidence and there are crimes committed. I hope they go down for what they did.
 
josie_L said:
There is evidence and there are crimes committed. I hope they go down for what they did.
Click to expand...
The difference between justice and vengeance can be seen here. Justice would want to see punishment if there is a crime is shown to be committed. Vengeance just wants punishment.

I understand you want to see them go down. That is the very problem. Many Republicans want to see Hillary Clinton go down. Period. That is why I view Republican claims, votes, blogs, and rants, as inconsequential, and is definitely not evidentiary. I am still unclear of the crime that is being claimed. I know there was one suicide that has been suggested as being murder. As long as one does not violate civil service laws, which is hard to do, hiring political supporters is the epitome of the Executive Branch, as we have seen this year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top