Favor factory? Huma emails ...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Theo520
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A lot of people seem to have dismissed the email scandals [and the private **server … not a private email address] … figured to dismiss the issue as political campaign rhetoric.

But the issue is still there: mishandling of classified information.

ANNNND, freedom of information requests have revealed MANY MORE classified emails than previously estimated.
 
Monte_RCMS said:
A lot of people seem to have dismissed the email scandals [and the private **server
Click to expand...
… not a private email address] … figured to dismiss the issue as political campaign rhetoric.

But the issue is still there: mishandling of classified information.

ANNNND, freedom of information requests have revealed MANY MORE classified emails than previously estimated.

I believe, not sure which committee, they are reconsidering opening an investigation regarding Clinton, Lynch, Comey, Rice. . . . . .
 
Monte_RCMS said:
ANNNND, freedom of information requests have revealed MANY MORE classified emails than previously estimated.
Click to expand...
Then LOCK HER UP or stop talking about it. If there’s so much evidence against her, it should be a slam dunk for AG Sessions.
 
josie_L said:
I believe, not sure which committee, they are reconsidering opening an investigation regarding Clinton, Lynch, Comey, Rice. . . . . .
Click to expand...
There’s some swamp land in Sheboygan I’d like to sell you if believe that. 🙂
 
But former Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon told Fox News these emails will not distract from the ongoing investigation into Russian meddling and potential collusion with the Trump campaign in the 2016 presidential election.
Click to expand...
“Hillary Clinton is not in government anymore or a candidate for office,” Fallon told Fox News. “So none of this is going to succeed in distracting the public from the active FBI investigation into President Trump.”
Click to expand...
:rotfl:

Someone let me know when they bring out the clown car, I love seeing how many they can stuff in there.
 
I’m sure there’s plenty of evidence that Clinton did political favors for campaign donors. As seamy as that might seem, it’s as common as dirt in Washington and every state house, and nobody thinks of it as illegal.

Where the paths diverge, though, is when there is money paid, not to the campaign, but to the officeholder herself or her family members in exchange for favors.

And the diverge even more so when there are donations of any kind from foreign governments, and especially if they result in policy actions.
 
randomuser said:
There’s some swamp land in Sheboygan I’d like to sell you if believe that. 🙂
Click to expand...
Is this supposed to be like the “I have ocean front property in Arizona to sell you if you believe that” bit? Sheboygan is on Lake Michigan so there probably is actual swamp land there. 🤷
 
randomuser said:
Then LOCK HER UP or stop talking about it. If there’s so much evidence against her, it should be a slam dunk for AG Sessions.
Click to expand...
Doing such job favors would likely be a firing offense, not sure about federal charges.

Airing the issue is appropriate to help it serve as a deterrent to future similar transgressions by other individuals.
 
Theo520 said:
Doing such job favors would likely be a firing offense, not sure about federal charges.

Airing the issue is appropriate to help it serve as a deterrent to future similar transgressions by other individuals.
Click to expand...
If it gives occasion of sin to bear further false witness and spread more gossip, then no, it most certainly is not appropriate to keep playing the broken record about Hillary.

If there’s evidence, then LOCK HER UP. Otherwise, enough with the broken record.

Facts matter.
 
Yes, lock her up. She knows the law too well to just get locked up without a significant amount of digging…
 
randomuser said:
If it gives occasion of sin to bear further false witness and spread more gossip, then no, it most certainly is not appropriate to keep playing the broken record about Hillary.

If there’s evidence, then LOCK HER UP. Otherwise, enough with the broken record.

Facts matter.
Click to expand...
So you don’t think it helps as a deterrent to air facts on corruption.
Mind you this isn’t gossip, these are emails obtained through FOIA.
 
Theo520 said:
So you don’t think it helps as a deterrent to air facts on corruption.
Mind you this isn’t gossip, these are emails obtained through FOIA.
Click to expand...
No, I don’t think it helps. It is gossip

Facts matter, not gossip. LOCK HER UP and then claim it’s a deterrent. Until then…it’s gossip unbecoming any Catholic.
 
randomuser said:
No, I don’t think it helps. It is gossip

Facts matter, not gossip. LOCK HER UP and then claim it’s a deterrent. Until then…it’s gossip unbecoming any Catholic.
Click to expand...
The facts are the emails. That you think they are ‘gossip’ is a bit disturbing.
 
Theo520 said:
The facts are the emails. That you think they are ‘gossip’ is a bit disturbing.
Click to expand...
What I think is disturbing is that after nearly 20+ years of broken record about Hillary and Bill, there’s supposedly so much evidence of any wrongdoing vis a vis Benghazi (how many investigations?) and her stupid e-mails and so on and there’s still no criminal prosecution for whatever it is they did. **It’s gossip. Move on. **

FACTS MATTER. NOT GOSSIP.
 
randomuser said:
What I think is disturbing is that after nearly 20+ years of broken record about Hillary and Bill, there’s supposedly so much evidence of any wrongdoing vis a vis Benghazi (how many investigations?) and her stupid e-mails and so on and there’s still no criminal prosecution for whatever it is they did. It’s gossip. Move on.

FACTS MATTER. NOT GOSSIP.
Click to expand...
The emails/server/classified info is a separate issue from Bengazi. You seem to be conflating the two. The fact that Hillary Clinton broke basic security rules in regards to classified emails is a publicly known fact. It is not gossip. I find it odd that you seem to wish to turn this into an insinuation of sinning on the part of anyone here who believes Clinton should be charged for her misconduct.

We may never know what the true motivation was behind the Clinton/Obama State Department’s backing of certain factions during the “Arab Spring”. What we do know is that the State Department under Clinton actively sought to topple the governments of Lybia and Syria and seemed pretty supportive of the overthrow of the government in Egypt. Which has led directly to the insane violence and cruelty of the Islamic State. So I think we can safely say that the one thing tying Bengazi and the email server together is the gross incompetence of Hillary Clinton at the State Department.
 
randomuser said:
What I think is disturbing is that after nearly 20+ years of broken record about Hillary and Bill, there’s supposedly so much evidence of any wrongdoing vis a vis Benghazi (how many investigations?) and her stupid e-mails and so on and there’s still no criminal prosecution for whatever it is they did. It’s gossip. Move on.

FACTS MATTER. NOT GOSSIP.
Click to expand...
In what alternate reality is the email scandal gossip, you were aware that there were extenuating circumstances (Lynch, Comey, Obama and Bill. . . . ) behind this investigation and that it may very well reopen, headed by a new DOJ and with a new FBI director? Thank goodness!

Watch the whole clip:

youtube.com/watch?v=lAVaK5cdUxE
 
josie_L said:
In what alternate reality is the email scandal gossip, you were aware that there were extenuating circumstances (Lynch, Comey, Obama and Bill. . . . ) behind this investigation and that it may very well reopen
Click to expand...
I am aware of no such thing. It’s still gossip, and no amount of rationalizing the gossip makes it any less uncharitable. Either LOCK HER UP or move on. What part of LOCK HER UP means un-investigated, un-prosecuted, and un-convicted? Move on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top