L
Lapell
Guest
Whether in Greek or in our own languages (myself, my main language is French), the name is beautiful on our Blessed Mother, isn’t it?
Yes. When Catholics address Mary as ‘Sancta Dei Genitrix’ in the Angelus and ‘Mater Dei’ in the Ave Maria, it is the same as calling her ‘Theotokos’.That’s not true. The Catholic Church calls Mary Theotokos. It is a dogma of the faith.
Sancta dei Genitrix, Mater Dei, Theotokos, all so beautiful. No wonder Latin became the official language of Catholic Church, cause the some of the expressions are the most beautiful ones for Mother Mary.Yes. When Catholics address Mary as ‘Sancta Dei Genitrix’ in the Angelus and ‘Mater Dei’ in the Ave Maria, it is the same as calling her ‘Theotokos’.
There’s no evidence I’m aware of the assumption of Mary.Besides Catholics, who else celebrates this festival? If not why?
Happy feast to all who celebrate this festival![]()
Jesus was born of the virgin Mary, that’s what we know for sure. There’s no Biblical reason, I’m aware of, for her to be perpetually a virgin.Dokimas,
If you do not believe Christ was born of a perpetual virgin conceived without sin, you won’t understand her assumption…
BrianH;6965804:
This is a pretty nasty and uncalled for remark to a guy who has been cordial and informative to the utmost. He hasn’t taken any shot whatsoever at the Catholic church so why must you harshly question and chastize his??The argument against the Assumption is based upon historical record? Care to show me the vast historical evidence Peter was crucified upside down? What about Paul? Or do you reject the belief Peter was crucified upside down?
God has never heard of her Assumption? According to who? You? The Methodist Church? Baptists? As stated,if you accept the authority of the church to canonize 27 NT books in our Bibles in the 4th century,why is it impossible to do the same in the 19th century? Jesus said He would guide His church into all truth, never said say He would do it instantly.
Although I believe that Mary is in Heaven, I do not believe in the dogma of the Assumption. Also as an Anglican, I do not accept the authority of the Catholic church.Besides Catholics, who else celebrates this festival? If not why?
Happy feast to all who celebrate this festival![]()
This is perfectly obvious by your nameAlthough I believe that Mary is in Heaven, I do not believe in the dogma of the Assumption. Also as an Anglican, I do not accept the authority of the Catholic church.
I think that the more it happens, the more it negates the seriousness by which Catholics must view their church’s authority. Say what you will, but when something like Infallibility didn’t become church dogma until the late 19th century and the Assumption likewise, it does something to negate.Well understood,but like I said,it is a fact the church had authority to declare doctrines in the first 500 years,but in no shape negates it from doing the same the proceeding centuries,whether you accept it or not.
Thank youThis is perfectly obvious by your name![]()
Cranmer dost rocketh the house.Thank you![]()
you betchaCranmer dost rocketh the house.![]()

And yet, I assume, you accept the doctrine of the Trinity, the threefold Ministry, and the Canon of Scripture, all of which accepted under the authority of the Catholic Church. Where do you draw the line, m’lord?Although I believe that Mary is in Heaven, I do not believe in the dogma of the Assumption. Also as an Anglican, I do not accept the authority of the Catholic church.
Sancta dei Genitrix, Mater Dei, Theotokos, all so beautiful. No wonder Latin became the official language of Catholic Church, cause the some of the expressions are the most beautiful ones for Mother Mary.
Bless you all.



‘Still Anglican’, and yet you commit such an abortion against the language of the sublime BCP and AV? +Cranmer (the Archbishop, not the poster) would turn in his grave.Cranmer dost rocketh the house.![]()
And I am sure you wouldn’t apply your own arguments about the 300+ years to declare and define the doctrines of the Trinity,Incarnation,canon of scripture,etc.I think that the more it happens, the more it negates the seriousness by which Catholics must view their church’s authority. Say what you will, but when something like Infallibility didn’t become church dogma until the late 19th century and the Assumption likewise, it does something to negate.
And yet, I assume, you accept the doctrine of the Trinity, the threefold Ministry, and the Canon of Scripture, all of which accepted under the authority of the Catholic Church. Where do you draw the line, m’lord?
‘Still Anglican’, and yet you commit such an abortion against the language of the sublime BCP and AV? +Cranmer (the Archbishop, not the poster) would turn in his grave.