…As is known to happen, the dark side, or the wrong side, sometimes prevails in court. Not because the right side is lacking in sufficient legal arguments, but because court trials are a a cr*p shoot, down, i.e., it goes one way, also dependent on time and circumstance, factors outside legal arguments. Time and circumstance have a way of affecting case proceedings. Such as when Vaughan Walker, a gay judge, ruled on Prop 8, nullifying said voter initiative in California limiting marriage to a man and a woman, such as when just one more Supreme Court justice could have voted, but did not, for the interest of the United States instead of Edith Windsor on DOMA, such as when the case challenging the voter-approved gay “marriage” ban in Utah fell in the lap of Judge Shelby in the U.S. District Court, an Obama appointee sitting on the bench for just six months.
I realize such developments favoring gay “marriage” help your advocacy, but the wind is blowing in the wrong direction for society.
Consider that the winds blew a certain way three years before Roe v Wade was decided in favor of legal abortion by the Supreme Court in 1973. In that landmark case, plaintiff Norma McCorvey (Jane Roe) was pregnant, unemployed and depressed, and thereby sought an abortion. She was not raped but that was the story (for which she now regrets) she told two ambitious lawyers (Weddington and Coffee) who capitalized on the lie in challenging the Texas state law prohibiting abortion, the case going all the way to the Supreme Court. Roe v Wade is bad law, it is evil, but it is legal — 56 million American babies have been aborted and women in the millions have been harmed for over forty years. Increasingly, people would like to see this bad law allowing legal genocide of babies in the womb reversed.
Before any homosexual reading this gets bent out of shape, I am not at all posturing that homosexuals are evil. Homosexual “marriage” is.
,
