M
mschrank
Guest
Um, the lady was complaining about some bad apples, so I wrote about them.Sorry, but if only 2 out of 2,000 believe in what you wrote then it isn’t worth repeating.
Why not post what the other 1,998 believe?
Sigh…
Um, the lady was complaining about some bad apples, so I wrote about them.Sorry, but if only 2 out of 2,000 believe in what you wrote then it isn’t worth repeating.
Why not post what the other 1,998 believe?
Good luck defending yourself. SOME of these people feel oppressed by the ‘man’ so anything you do is anti-TLMism.I’m sorry I think you misunderstood what I said. I was defending the TLM, saying it doesn’t attract more bad apples, just a different kind that tends to make a more memorable impression.
I didn’t say they’re all bad apples and I said there are bad apples everywhere. Like I said they’re different But, the TLM does tend to attract the kind of types described by the OP (bitter conspiracy theorists, etc.) where you tend not to see them at other parishes. Instead you see other kinds of bad apples.
My point was, that every place has bad apples, but those that tend to go to the TLM (and as I said, it is definitely not all, not by a longshot–most people are as you describe) tend to stand out more in one’s mind than the usual types that you’re used to seeing everyday.
If they really hold these beliefs, they are no different than the “cafeteria Catholics” who believe that abortion is morally permissable in certain circumstances.Papal condemnation of slavery persisted throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Pope Gregory XVI’s 1839 bull, In Supremo, for instance, reiterated papal opposition to enslaving “Indians, blacks, or other such people” and forbade “any ecclesiastic or lay person from presuming to defend as permissible this trade in blacks under no matter what pretext or excuse.” In 1888 and again in 1890, Pope Leo XIII forcefully condemned slavery and sought its elimination where it persisted in parts of South America and Africa.
There was nothing to suggest that the parishioners mentioned have any kind of such fantasy, so the remark was quite unnecessary. In fact as other posters pointed out it is outright offensive and judgmental to believe that just a handful of parishioners go to mass because of this.Um, the lady was complaining about some bad apples, so I wrote about them.
Sigh…
You prove my point I made above of why people feel self conscious. You cannot judge each individual’s reverence based on a NO mass. At parishes where the pastor does not do enough to encourage people to be reverent, people will essentially do whatever anybody else is doing. There are actually reverent people who do not display their reverence out of fear of drawing attention to themselves, keeping in mind the words of Christ: “your Father who sees in secret will repay you.”I have been going to a TLM for about a year and I would have to say they seem quite nice…and quite reverent. I contrast that to many I see at my NO parish…and reverence is not a word I would use.
No, some of these people respect the Mass enough to find it offensive when someone tells another poster that she’s naturally going to find people who view the Traditional Mass as a fantasy role-playing game. That simply isn’t the case.Good luck defending yourself. SOME of these people feel oppressed by the ‘man’ so anything you do is anti-TLMism.
Oh and BTW, I attend a TLM on Sundays.
Wrong!There was nothing to suggest that the parishioners mentioned have any kind of such fantasy, so the remark was quite unnecessary. In fact as other posters pointed out it is outright offensive and judgmental to believe that just a handful of parishioners go to mass because of this.
I don’t think anyone should judge or even guess why some people go to mass, and to assume they go for anything but our Lord is unChristian.
It’s typical historical escapism.Second, I’m also feeling uncomfortable with some of the rhetoric coming from some traditional Catholics. Among some traditionalists, there seems to be a tendency to embrace questionable ideas such as “Lost Cause” Confederate mythology…
I never got the impression that *they *(meaning the parishioners)wanted to own slaves - rather they defend the fact that Southerners owned slaves and quite often romanticize the South and the institution of slavery.“The good ole’ days of Southern rights and slavery?” Just how “traditional” are these people? States’ rights are one thing but slavery is hardly something that was just abolished by Vatican II or even Vatican I. I take it they never read Paul’s Letter to Philemon? Are they so “traditonal” that they even reject this?
So let me get this straight - a few red necks happen to belong to this “lost cause” business and that means that they go to mass to escape?Wrong!
It’s typical historical escapism.
Don’t worry. It doesn’t exist. This thread has turned into a Traditional bashing. If I posted the exact same thing over on Liturgy and Sacraments and accused those that go to the Ordinary Form of this, I would be banned.This whole racial bit and the Traditional Mass must only be an American thing - I have never come across this.
In starting this thread, it wasn’t my intention to bash traditional Catholics. Obviously, in any group of people you’ll find the good, the bad, and the ugly. Despite the problems that are occuring in my parish, I don’t see myself stop going there unless something truly dramatic and scandalous occurs. Regardless of where I go in the future, I’ll always prefer the traditional prayers and novenas. I think what myself and probably some of the other posters are saying is that they don’t want to have to buy into certain beliefs to feel like they belong at a TLM. “The Most Beautiful Thing This Side of Heaven” should be for everybody, even with those with whom we disagreed vehemently with.Don’t worry. It doesn’t exist. This thread has turned into a Traditional bashing. If I posted the exact same thing over on Liturgy and Sacraments and accused those that go to the Ordinary Form of this, I would be banned.