Y
Yes
Guest
There is nothing “traditional” about females wearing clerical garb. It’s not right to allow women to wear clerical garb that has long been on loan to boys who serve at the altar. If anything, it looks extremely *Protestant *to me.
I was vested last Sunday just like those girls and a group of people asked me why I wore that outfit in place of the alb – they were happy to see it. I admitted that (in this case) my alb was soiled so I decided to vest more formally. They asked why the cassock/surplice was rarely used anymore.
I explained that it’s really not kosher to allow females to vest in clerical garb. I used Masses at the National Shrine in DC as a prime example. Male servers wear the cassock/surplice, female servers wear an alb. About 3/4 of the people understood, the remaining begame angry.
(It’s interesting to note that in many parts of the world, altar servers wear the Roman collar when the serve Mass. Does that mean that if they had female altar servers who were vested in the a cassock and surplice that they too would wear a Roman collar?)
I was vested last Sunday just like those girls and a group of people asked me why I wore that outfit in place of the alb – they were happy to see it. I admitted that (in this case) my alb was soiled so I decided to vest more formally. They asked why the cassock/surplice was rarely used anymore.
I explained that it’s really not kosher to allow females to vest in clerical garb. I used Masses at the National Shrine in DC as a prime example. Male servers wear the cassock/surplice, female servers wear an alb. About 3/4 of the people understood, the remaining begame angry.
(It’s interesting to note that in many parts of the world, altar servers wear the Roman collar when the serve Mass. Does that mean that if they had female altar servers who were vested in the a cassock and surplice that they too would wear a Roman collar?)