I was the first on this thread to make the suggestion of contacting a lawyer, and while I despise one parent using his/her children as a manipulative tool against the other, and I *do *believe in using the courts if necessary to secure parental rights…I think that in giving my suggestion I may have jumped the gun without giving too much consideration to the entire situation. After more thought, I have to acknowledge that there is some sense in what TheRealJuliane is saying, even if I remain uncertain as to her conclusive advice.
(emphasis mine)
My advice, and you won’t like it…
Break off the engagement and let this man raise his daughter. He really shouldn’t be bringing anyone else into this highly unstable situation and I don’t care if his ex GF is nuts or not, she’s the mother of his daughter and ALWAYS will be. He has a responsibility to his daughter first, anyone else a distant last place.
He made this child with his ex-GF. He needs to deal with her, and raise his daughter as best he can. I think his parents are looking out for the best interests of their grandchild and trying to remind him that he already has responsibilities.
He made that child with that particular girl. He found her suitable to have intercourse with. So if she’s not suitable to marry, that’s on him, isn’t it. It’s too late to say, “Oh, but I wouldn’t have, if I’d only known!”
As to the father of the child: We don’t know what he was like in high school, and we don’t know what he is like now - whether he has matured, is really trying to do right by his child, etc. We *do *know however that he never married the mother of his child, and in fact agreed to terminate the relationship a mere three months after the birth. Yes, times have changed, but back in the day it would have been expected for a man to assume responsibility and form a stable family (marriage) if a pregnancy resulted from engaging in sexual intimacy. Did he ever propose to the mother, and was rejected by her? Or did he never make the attempt at all? Maybe the ex-girlfriend
is crazy or a less-than gracious person, who knows…but Juliane made a reasonable point - he didn’t really mind what her mental state was at the time he was having sex with her, did he? Perhaps it would have been in the best interest of the child he helped to create to have sacrificed his temporary happiness in order to do the honorable thing. Maybe this concept still holds true today?
As to the grandparents: While the ultimate authority does not lie with them, I’ve considered this a bit more from their probable viewpoint, and I can’t fairly say that this is none of their business and that they should butt out. In their defense, let’s consider this - who do we think stepped in to help when this child was born? Isn’t it likely that it was the *grandparents *(either the paternal or maternal ones) who were providing the roof over the child’s head and assuming a great part of the financial burden themselves? Remember, these parents were 17 year-old high school children at the time the child was conceived, and it is highly unlikely they survived all on their own. It is actually quite often that irresponsible teenagers (and sometimes young adults as well) create children and then leave much of the responsibility of actually *caring *for those children to the grandparents, whether it is in the form of babysitting, feeding and clothing or providing other financial support in terms of rent, food, and/or medical bills. I agree that these grandparents (the actual responsible ones) probably only want what’s best for the child, and that it is not just about control or dislike of the OP. What’s best for children is usually a stable, 2-parent home consisting of the biological mother and father (assuming of course, that the biological parents are not abusive or too incompetent to provide adequate care.)
As to the mother of the child: It is possible that she is a malicious and vindicative person, we don’t know. It is *also *possible however, that she is simply afraid of raising a child alone and is using this ploy as an attempt to regain some control over a situation that has left the greater burden of care upon her shoulders. I have to admit, if I were a young and single mother who (and let’s face it, she probably doesn’t have the best education under her belt and therefore not the best career and income opportunities), I would probably be very worried that a new fiancee would be a threat to the security of my offspring. I’m not saying that threats to withhold the child are the right way to go about it, but I’m just making the point that she is young and maybe in a very unstable position and is acting out of fear.
OP, I don’t mean to cast aspersions upon your fiance, and I’m not going to suggest that you break up with him. You are both young though, and even though you love him I do want you to consider whether he really is going to be a responsible mate for you. I don’t really know what is the best option in light of not knowing all of the details, except that perhaps what *everyone *in this situation should do is put aside their own self-interests and allow for the best decision to be made for the child.