D
deMontfort
Guest
I’m a skeptic, to the point of being dubious, however I’ll never say anything negative about something multiple Popes have endorsed. Rome has spoken, the case is closed.
Yes, that is what it seems to be. They will be on each other throats. That’s why threads on the Catholic Charismatic Renewal very often get derailed as they would not discussed on the topic but how wrong each other are. Can we believe this happen among Catholics?Well, in my book, the Church has said the Charismatic Movement has the “thumbs up” and I defer to Rome in such mattersI just know the Rad Trads absolutely hate the Charismatic Movement, which can make for some entertaining threads
![]()
You are right, of course. And nobody in the Renewal ever claim that everybody, I mean EVERYBODY, will receive the gifts of the Holy Spirit, which includes vision.I mean that the exact manifestation in any particular person is not something to be guaranteed like a consumer product, that is all. It is not that young men shall not see visions, but only the caution that this is not a promise of specific “results” for any particular person.
Opening ourselves to the outpouring of the Holy Spirit is always done in imitation of Our Lady, a matter of “I am your handmaid, do with me as you will” for the sake of the will of God, rather than a “do this, get that.”
That is all I meant: that is, to clarify that the goal of the charismatic movement is to be put at the disposal of the Holy Spirit, not the other way around. It is very easy for that to be misunderstood.
I agree. And St. John of the Cross too. He wrote about that experience.Indeed. One of the greatest saints of recent memory, Mother Teresa of Calcutta, endured agonising spiritual dryness for the final forty-nine years of her life, having lost her confidence in God’s existence. We know this due to the posthumous publication of her diaries. And yet she persevered, living her life as she thought Christ would have wanted, even though she was no longer certain of His existence.
I think it also stems from the idea being attractive to excitable persons. That does NOT make it wrong, but people who get “into” this is a bandwagon way can give some incorrect impressions. It makes it something that has to be explained very clearly right off the bat. There is nothing wrong with being excited about it at all, I’m not saying that, but it is extremely important to be certain those interested do not to read things in that the movement as Rome has endorsed it simply does not espouse. Some people hear “…you can experience it today from your own home. Just ask…” and they are off to the races in ways that were never intended. Not to beat a dead horse, but I think a lot of the wariness comes from those who have concerns that can be put to rest, but not concerns that weren’t reasonable to have at all. Correctly understood, it still may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but it shouldn’t make people outside the movement wary of it.I think, as you say, this stems from the misunderstanding that the origins are somehow Protestant.
I know a great many people involved that are not at all excitable.I think it also stems from the idea being attractive to excitable persons.
This is very true. There are as many different approaches to living the Spirit Filled life as there are personalities.I think it is kind of like traditional Catholicism that way. … we have a very rich treasury of tradition in the Church, such that there is more than any one soul can ever live fully…
Let me clarify: I don’t mean that people within the movement are excitable, but that people outside the movement who are excitable can read the wrong things in when they hear about it. That’s why I asked that the OP clarify what was meant in the original post. People have heard things like that from people who didn’t know what they were talking about or who were what they call the “name it and claim it” Protestant mindsets. (Even among Protestants, there are few who really believe that God is going to make them emotionally bubbly all the time or that being filled with the Holy Spirit is going to eventually make them into de facto magicians who have the Spirit at their beck and call. Just a few excited people can single-handedly give a lot of wrong impression.)I know a great many people involved that are not at all excitable.
But one theme I have heard in all the opposition is about “emotion” and how one should not follow their emotions. I think perhaps it is an approach to spirituality that incorporates emotions, and some people want the opposite.
Yes, and to be fair, there are some people who get on an emotional high, then when the tough times come, they disappear!Just a few excited people can single-handedly give a lot of wrong impression.
It started near here, just north of Pittsburgh by Duquesne students.The video focused on the first decade. I would be interested in comments about the 4 decades since.
Say it ain’t so!I can. Human beings, Catholic or no, are contentious creatures. Cliqueish too.
This is very true. If we allow ourselves to have the fullness of the Holy Spirit Jesus’s promised to all those who believe in him, we can get it.The outpouring of the Holy Spirit is for everybody –all of us, if we allow ourselves to be. That’s the promise of the Lord, not that everybody will receive the gifts of the Holy Spirit, which are given as the Spirit gives
In our diocese, the greatest impact of the Renewal was probably in the eighties, where thousands of Catholics came back to the Church as a result of being baptised in the Holy Spirit.The video focused on the first decade. I would be interested in comments about the 4 decades since.
How is the charismatic movement functioning in your own local area? I realize some manifestation will be not readily visible or corporate, but some should be. How does the renewal in your area now compare to the first few years after 1967?