Filioque and Eastern Christian Trinitarian understanding

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hesychios
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
SFH:
Which ironically, you turn around and do when you judge St. Thomas Aquinas.šŸ˜‰
He has judged himself.

How can a man be a saint when he has condemned the entire membership of the Orthodox Church to hell?

And let’s not even get into his teaching that heretics should be killed by the State and the Church should enforce it.

Such teachings are far from Christ and what man wants to eat the honey of theology when there it is mixed with the poison of hate?
 
steve b said:
1. Focus on what Paul said. Those who divide and stay divided won’t inherit heaven. Paul said that not me.

Are you sayng that the Roman Catholic Church interprets Saint Paul as meaning that all the Orthodox go to hell?

Why are you unable to answer this straightforward question?

It seems that you want it both ways. YOU want to put this interpretation on Saint Paul, but you cannot do it openly because you know that you would be opposing your Church’s teaching.

This is a bit silly, isn’t it. Please say plainly what you believe.
 
steve b:
The pope and two stalwart Western leaders helped topple the entire Soviet empire without moving a single division across a border.
A little exaggerative. If I may repeat my message above…

A certain amount of credit must be given to the Pope. But as a Catholic theologian has noted: ā€œit’s also heavily exaggerated by papal propagandists. After all, the Soviet regime did not fail because of the pope (before the arrival of Gorbachev, the pope was achieving about as little as he is now achieving in China), but instead imploded because of the Soviet system’s inherent economic and social contradictions.ā€

We must also look at the spiritual reality - there were the prayers of millions of Orthodox Christians every day and night in all their churches and in their home prayers .

There was also the blood and the prayers of the 20 million Orthodox martyred by the communists and gathered before the throne of the Lamb. This is, from the real viewpoint of God’s verities, the true reason why communism came crashing down so quickly - the blood of the holy martyrs.

All you holy Martyrs of Russia
pray for us
 
Matthew P.:
I watched a program on EWTN a while ago and found something that a well known and very lovable Priest had said to be rather disturbing. I have come to the conclusion that correct Patristic tradition is necessary for correct interpretation of Holy Writ. I recall the lovable Priest speaking about the very serious sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. He gave the example of a man going to confession and confessing that he was living with a woman and not married and he knows that it is a sin but has no intention of correcting the situation. This he called the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. ***Surely there are many sincere people who struggle with sins and intention as well as emotions. Saying such implies that there is no hope for such people. ***
Matthew,

You make 3 points.
  1. I agree, that a correct interpretation is needed of holy writ
  2. A man in a confessional[entering a sacrament] confessing to God that he knows fornication is wrong [mortal sin], and he has no intent on stopping, is most definitely sinning against the Holy Spirit. As Paul says ā€œthe sinful nature desires what is contrary to the Spirit, and the Spirit what is contrary to the sinful natureā€ In this guys case, he flaunts forgiveness (not sorry) for mortal sin, refuses to change, even though the Spirit tells him he is wrong. You bet he’s blaspheming the HS.
  3. Struggle with sin is one thing, we all do that. But arrogance about not even wanting to stop sinning, and flaunting forgiveness, is another matter. A grave offense against the HS
Matthew P:
As I mentioned earlier, from the Orthodox Christian perspective repentance is available until your last breath, like the wise thief on the cross and there is always hope with our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
That is Catholic teaching as well. The scenerio you describe with the guy in the confessional is a completely different scenerio.
Matthew P:
The Orthodox understanding of Matthew 12:32 is that the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is against the divine activity of the Spirit - the accusation that Jesus Christ healed the demonic by demonic power (v. 24). rather than the power of the Holy Spirit (v. 28; see Mark 3.29, 30) Every sin against the Son of Man can be forgiven, because the Jews do not yet know much about him. But the blasphemy against the Spirit, whose divine activity they know from the OT, will not be forgiven. This blasphemy is a willful hardness of heart.
BINGO!!! It’s a hardness of heart. Which is exactly the story of the man IN THE CONFESSIONAL, who confesses he is seriously sinning, and says he refuses to change.
 
40.png
SFH:
Father Ambrose,
If you can’t address the substantive arguments of St. Thomas Aquinas, then admit it and move on. These personal attacks against Mr. Likoudis, St. Thomas Aquinas, and EWTN Catholic priests don’t prove anything.
You don’t see my point. A man who is so morally depraved (I am using the words in their technical meaning so don’t take offence) is unable to write lucid theology. A man who is so lacking in love that he condemns the Orthodox Greeks to hell cannot possibly write anything worthwhile on the Holy Trinity which is Love itself. ā€œGod is love.ā€ His words may seem logically compelling on a human level but because of the failure of love in his heart we see the fruits of this failure in his condemnation of others and he is far from God. In the treatise ā€œContra Errores Graecorumā€ he is trying to lay out the deepest and most secret mysteries of the inner life of the Trinity and at the same time and in the same treatise he is saying that the Orthodox, because they do not accept his reasonings, are damned. Excuse me if I weep over his blindness! His theology is only his own cleverness, headspun and not Godspun. Thomas himself realised this at the end of his life. I hope God forgave him for the words against the Greek Christians and for the theology which he created which gave a theological justification for the Inquisition and its executions.

As for me, I am a man of a a very small brain, and if the greatest Saints of the Church have warned us of the limitations in our understanding of the Trinity then I believe them. They are theological giants -who am I? Their words of caution were used to start this thread and have been repeated several times. But, in the vanity of their minds, later theologians paid them lip service while inwardly believing that they knew better than the holy Fathers and so they tripped themselves up.
 
Fr Ambrose:
Are you sayng that the Roman Catholic Church interprets Saint Paul as meaning that all the Orthodox go to hell?
Are you feeling uneasy? I said nothing of the kind. I said

" Focus on what Paul said. Those who divide and stay divided won’t inherit heaven. Paul said that not me."

I asked you what he meant. Why are you unable to answer this straightforward question?

He’s addressing Christians in Galatia. He’s not addressing a bunch of pagans. Why is division, in Paul’s mind, serious enough to land one in hell if they don’t discontinue their division?
fr ambrose:
It seems that you want it both ways. YOU want to put this interpretation on Saint Paul, but you cannot do it openly because you know that you would be opposing your Church’s teaching.

This is a bit silly, isn’t it. Please say plainly what you believe.
I think you’re wiggling. The Galatians (no telling how many were involved) were being warned AGAIN by Paul, what consequences there were in division.

Why is division so serious that Paul says one won’t inherit heaven if they continue in that state?
 
Dear Steve B,

Firstly, it is no bingo, such terminology is usually used for less serious matters. Secondly, there are people who get caught up in emotional states of confusion particularly when the are involved in relationships as mentioned above even in the confessional booth.

From the Orthodox tradition we learn that 2 things are required.

A willful hardness of heart and the accusation that Jesus Christ healed the demonic by demonic power.

How many people are addicted to drugs, alcohol or fornication and can’t seem to want to stop doing what they are doing even though it is a sin? Are all of their hearts so hardened to the degree that damnation is the quick conclusion. A person’s heart can change during their life time. Tell me Steve what if the man comes back the very next day and wants to go to confession again and decides to change, is he still doomed since he allegedly was guilty of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. Confession and repentance are no longer available to him because he made a confession when he allegedly was guilty of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit as it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come. The Priest can’t hear his confession and he has no hope of salvation? He spends the rest of his life as a doomed person? The Grace of God is no longer available to him even if he or she now is struggling his heart? How can God’s Grace ever be limited? Repentance is available up to our last breath unless a premature conclusion is rendered which negates any possibility of repentance even if the person want to repent? Repentance not accepted? That would be utter madness.

To reiterate; The Orthodox understanding of Matthew 12:32 is that the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is against the divine activity of the Spirit - the accusation that Jesus Christ healed the demonic by demonic power (v. 24). rather than the power of the Holy Spirit (v. 28; see Mark 3.29, 30) Every sin against the Son of Man can be forgiven, because the Jews do not yet know much about him. But the blasphemy against the Spirit, whose divine activity they know from the OT, will not be forgiven. This blasphemy is a willful hardness of heart. It attributes the saving action of the Spirit to Satan and refuses to accept God’s forgiveness and mercy.

Assuming you are comfortable looking into the person’s heart and drawing a conclusion in accordance with that given by the Priest, could you explain to me why a retraction was issued on EWTN that made very clear the correct above Orthodox interpretation?

Thank you in advance.

In Christ,

Matthew Panchisin
 
A man who is so lacking in love that he condemns the Orthodox Greeks to hell cannot possibly write anything worthwhile on the Holy Trinity which is Love itself.

One could say the same about anti-Semitism among several of the Church Fathers. But fallibility negates neither love nor charity. Moreover, what St. Thomas wrote was in the interest of protecting souls by warning them, which is hardly uncharitable. It would be more uncharitable to remain silent in such a case. At any rate, such negative judgments can serve no good end.
 
JPrejean said:
A man who is so lacking in love that he condemns the Orthodox Greeks to hell cannot possibly write anything worthwhile on the Holy Trinity which is Love itself.

One could say the same about anti-Semitism among several of the Church Fathers. But fallibility negates neither love nor charity. Moreover, what St. Thomas wrote was in the interest of protecting souls by warning them, which is hardly uncharitable. It would be more uncharitable to remain silent in such a case. At any rate, such negative judgments can serve no good end.

I am sorry, jprejean, but Aquinas brings down a negative judgement against the Orthodox in his treatise on the Trinity ā€œContra Errores Graecorum.ā€ Not content with theologizing he has the temerity to say that the Greeks cannot be saved because they do not accept his reasonings. If you do not find that presumptuous and lacking in charity…?

Should the Orthodox assume this ā€œcharitableā€ attitude and warn the Catholics that a belief in the filioque and papal supremacy will loose them their salvation?
 
Should the Orthodox assume this ā€œcharitableā€ attitude and warn the Catholics that a belief in the filioque and papal supremacy will loose them their salvation?

There are those who have done so. I consider them mistaken and misguided, but not evil. Let us try to correct them in fraternal charity, not harsh judgment. Far easier said than done, I know, but surely a worthy goal.
 
40.png
JPrejean:
Let us try to correct them in fraternal charity, not harsh judgment. Far easier said than done, I know, but surely a worthy goal.
Not so sure. What’s the difference between the culture of death which saw Terri Schiavo condemned to die and the culture of spiritual death which condemns millions to an eternity in hell for holding an inconvenient theology?
 
Dear Father Ambrose,

One would be temporary and the other eternal. The temporary would be much better; both should be shunned and certainly not played with.

Although we see remnants of that sort of thought from some who are Roman Catholic or profess to be Roman Catholic it is thanks be to God a position that is not put forth by most Roman Catholics in a more reasonable mindset. Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople had mentioned in response for the return of the relics of two of the Orthodox Church’s beloved Saints, St. John Chrysostom and St. Gregory Nazianzen something like we must keep in mind that this gesture of love comes from a loving man Pope JPII and he was not behaving in the same manner of some in the past. There is no doubt in my mind that Pope JPII is an extremely good hearted man and has suffered in a very difficult position for many years.

In Christ,

Matthew Panchisin
 
Not so sure. What’s the difference between the culture of death which saw Terri Schiavo condemned to die and the culture of spiritual death which condemns millions to an eternity in hell for holding an inconvenient theology?
the church teaches that the only people who go to hell are those who refuse God’s grace until the end. but somehow when people are saved, it’s always through the church. aquinas’s writings should be read in light of the living traditions of the church.

when it come to purgatory and the filioque, either accept the catholic understanding of these mysteries as a valid development of doctrine in the occidental church, or reject them. if you reject them you reject any possiblility of reunion.

that being said, catholics consider the orthodox understanding of final attonement and the procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father as a valid understanding of these mysteries.

the hope of the Holy Father is that the east and west can breath on two lungs again so that there is a cross-fertiliztion of traditions in the church as they complement each other.
 
oat soda:
the church teaches that the only people who go to hell are those who refuse God’s grace until the end. but somehow when people are saved, it’s always through the church. aquinas’s writings should be read in light of the living traditions of the church.
OK, but I cannot take any theologian seriously who condemns me to damnation because I adhere to the ancient teaching of the Church on the Trinity.
when it come to purgatory and the filioque, either accept the catholic understanding of these mysteries as a valid development of doctrine in the occidental church, or reject them. if you reject them you reject any possiblility of reunion.
I don’t think it is that desparate and the Orthodox can afford to be patient. You are slowly changing. To the credit of the RCs, there has been a very subtle attempt to re-create Purgatory into a more ā€œOrthodox palatableā€ ideal -speaking more in terms of ā€œstateā€ than of a ā€œplaceā€, let alone one specifically created for ā€œsatisfying the debt in temporal punishment due to personal sins.ā€. This latter aspect too, is unacceptable from an Orthodox view - for as far as Orthodoxy is concerned, if God forgives you, you are forgiven immediately, not imperfectly. If there is a question of imperfection, an imperfection that may last even into the grave, it is a question of the disposition of a soul, and something that has to be altered in its heart. Thus, Orthodoxy doesn’t accept the older ā€œmore traditionalā€ RC doctrine of purgatory, precisely because Orthodox Christianity does not accept the rigid, legalistic idea of God’s ā€œnecessary justiceā€ which just HAS to be propitiated with sufferings. Suffering does have a value for sinners, but it is a purely medicinal one - just as God is not in need of anything in other respects, He is not ā€œin needā€ of vengence upon us for any slights we have shown Him.
 
Fr Ambrose:
A little exaggerative. If I may repeat my message above…

A certain amount of credit must be given to the Pope. But as a Catholic theologian has noted: "it’s also*** heavily exaggerated*** by papal propagandists.
The entire world is watching and praying for the pope as we speak. I’ll refer you to the TV for the coming days. Watch it and learn about this great man and pope.
fr ambrose:
After all, the Soviet regime did not fail because of the pope (before the arrival of Gorbachev, the pope was achieving about as little as he is now achieving in China), but instead imploded because of the Soviet system’s inherent economic and social contradictions."
In defeating communism in Russia, what the media won’t talk about is, JPII couldn’t get help from the Patriarch of Russia whose KGB code name was Drozdov or his bishops under him who had KGB code names also. They were fully inculturated into the communist system. No doubt they were responsible for many losing their faith and their lives in Russia. JPII saved the Orthodox and the Catholics that were left in Russia. But after the fall of communism, the Patriarch and bishops were responsible for protesting JPII from visiting Russia. You need to pray for your patriarch and his bishops in Russia for their repentance and conversion, then offer a prayer of thanksgiving for JPII.
 
steve b:
The entire world is watching and praying for the pope as we speak. I’ll refer you to the TV for the coming days. Watch it and learn about this great man and pope.
My dear man, there is a candle burning for him now before the icons just as there was for Terri Schiavo. I was up between 2am and 3am this morning watching the live broadcast from Rome by the BBC.
In defeating communism in Russia, what the media won’t talk about is, JPII couldn’t get help from the Patriarch of Russia whose KGB code name was Drozdov or his bishops under him who had KGB code names also. They were fully inculturated into the communist system. No doubt they were responsible for many losing their faith and their lives in Russia.
We know this. It is part of the reason why the Russians in the West formed a separate administration independent of Moscow. I belong to this - the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad.
JPII saved the Orthodox and the Catholics that were left in Russia.
Look, I am not going to underestimate his influence but he did not save the Orthodox and the Catholics in Russia. It was GOD who did this and it was because there are 20 million new Orthodox martyrs from Russia standing around His throne and beseching him to rescue their homeland which was once known as Holy Russia.

There is a good essay about the Pope

John Paul II:One of the very last truly great ones
Apr. 1 2005
cbc.ca/national/rex/rex_050401.html
 
I don’t think it is that desparate and the Orthodox can afford to be patient. You are slowly changing. To the credit of the RCs, there has been a very subtle attempt to re-create Purgatory into a more ā€œOrthodox palatableā€ ideal -speaking more in terms of ā€œstateā€ than of a ā€œplaceā€, let alone one specifically created for ā€œsatisfying the debt in temporal punishment due to personal sins.ā€.
exactly, the CCC doesn’t call purgatory a place but ā€œthe final purificationā€ before the Final Judgment by a purifying fire. it does not say anything about suffering.

this is why the western church needs the eastern church. left on our own, we perhaps did get overly legalistic. i’m sure JPII agrees. maybe the eastern church can benefit from western lay movements. i think in the early church there was a great deal of cross liturgical development. the angus dei i believe was started in antioch.
 
Matthew P.:
Dear Steve B,

Firstly, it is no bingo, such terminology is usually used for less serious matters.
What are you talking about?
Matthew P.:
Secondly, there are people who get caught up in emotional states of confusion particularly when the are involved in relationships as mentioned above even in the confessional booth.
You said the man goes into the confessional. Confesses a serious sin [mortal] that he says he has no intention of stopping. That means he’s not sorry, and he’s not asking for forgiveness.
No sorrow, no forgiveness
Matthew P.:
From the Orthodox tradition we learn that 2 things are required.

A willful hardness of heart and the accusation that Jesus Christ healed the demonic by demonic power.
The sin you described and the disposition of the sinner you described is a deadly combination. By that I mean hell bound. Would you like me to quote the supporting scripture?
Matthew P.:
How many people are addicted to drugs, alcohol or fornication and can’t seem to want to stop doing what they are doing even though it is a sin?
If one wants to stop doing what they know is wrong but is addicted, that’s different from one who doesn’t desire to stop what they are doing.
Matthew P.:
Are all of their hearts so hardened to the degree that damnation is the quick conclusion.
Before the law there is no sin. When the law is given, sin and consequence is defined. Scripture clearly describes activities that are mortal sin… For example, scripture says the sexually immoral won’t enter heaven. Scripture defines the sin and the corresponding consequence of that sin if it is unrepented for. Will God cut someone slack if they don’t ask for forgiveness before they die? That’s up to Him. But the sin and the consequence is defined, so people will know how to live properly
Matthew P.:
A person’s heart can change during their life time. Tell me Steve what if the man comes back the very next day and wants to go to confession again and decides to change, is he still doomed since he allegedly was guilty of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.
As long as you can still fog a mirror, you can be forgiven anything. But suppose in the original case, he leaves the confessional unrepentant, and has a massive heart attack and dies instantly, before his body hits the floor? He died with a mortal sin on his soul. No chance for 1 last oops God, I’m sorry.
Matthew P.:
Confession and repentance are no longer available to him because he made a confession when he allegedly was guilty of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit as it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.
Now you’re describing our friend who has already died. He can’t in the next life hope for forgiveness of unrepented mortal sin. He needed to ask for forgiveness on this side of eternity…
Matthew P.:
Repentance is available up to our last breath unless a premature conclusion is rendered which negates any possibility of repentance even if the person want to repent? Repentance not accepted? That would be utter madness.
I agree.
Matthew P.:
Assuming you are comfortable looking into the person’s heart and drawing a conclusion in accordance with that given by the Priest, could you explain to me why a retraction was issued on EWTN that made very clear the correct above Orthodox interpretation?

Thank you in advance.

In Christ,

Matthew Panchisin
  1. I’m not looking into anybody’s heart or drawing any conclusions. I’m stating the sin, and quoting the consequence as laid out by scripture.
  2. Print the original story you’re talking about, then I’ll comment.
 
Fr Ambrose:
Well, I would not speak so offhandedly myself of the words of our Lord 😦

Sorry, I reversed the numbers. It is John 15:26

Not really, by that logic, we would have to say that the Son possesses the Fatherhood of the Father and that the Son begets Himself.
This may already have been answered, but one can not own one’s own existence (or ā€œistenceā€ in the case of God.) We run into a limitation of language here in that the posessive is designed to refer to the owenership of creatures, not of God. Because of this limitation, the words by design exclude the two countercases above.
 
steve b:
The entire world is watching and praying for the pope as we speak. I’ll refer you to the TV for the coming days. Watch it and learn about this great man and pope.

In defeating communism in Russia, what the media won’t talk about is, JPII couldn’t get help from the Patriarch of Russia whose KGB code name was Drozdov or his bishops under him who had KGB code names also. They were fully inculturated into the communist system. No doubt they were responsible for many losing their faith and their lives in Russia. JPII saved the Orthodox and the Catholics that were left in Russia. But after the fall of communism, the Patriarch and bishops were responsible for protesting JPII from visiting Russia. You need to pray for your patriarch and his bishops in Russia for their repentance and conversion, then offer a prayer of thanksgiving for JPII.
Would you be interested in knowing that all heads of state and those who were considered influential had code names, even the president of the United States had a KGB code name.

StMarkEofE
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top