This is a direct link to BrJR’s post:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=7228350&postcount=30
The whole thread is a goldmine of Br JR’s writings on the SFO. I just stole this whole post of his so we’d have it here:
I was not there in 1978 when the Secular Franciscan Rule was rewritten, though I did help with the translation into Spanish from the Latin, but my feeling is that the General Council was trying to unify the Secular Franciscans. That’s how the new name came into existence. They were often divided into different groups: Capuching Third Order, Franciscan Third Order, Conventual Third Order, Third Order of St. Francis. All of these divisions were nonsensical, because it was one order, with one founder, one rule and one patrimony. The divisions were manipulations to give the friar-priests control over the seculars.
Unfortunately, many Secular Franciscans have not outgrown this. They still promote an un-Franciscan veneration of the friar-priests and often subordinate themselves to them, when no one asks them to do so. On the other hand, there is also a weakness that is taking root among many Secular Franciscan fraternities. It’s called secularism. The Order is to be an oder of secular men and women, lay and ordained. But it is supposed to be visibly Franciscan. The visbility is not always there. Many fraternities have reduced Franciscan life to a monthly meeting. This is not the way that the Secular Franciscan saints lived their vocation.
You have women like St. Elizabeth of Hungary who ran a hospital for the poor. There were other Secular Franciscan ministries such as hospices, schools for the poor, orphanages, missions. Among the five Franciscan martyrs there were Secular Franciscan missionaries. Martyrd with St. Paul Miki of Japan were Jesuits and Secular Franciscans.
St. Thomas More wrote his great work, Utopia, based on Franciscan spirituality. The Franciscan ideal of peace and justice is very clear through his writing. St. Louis King of France guided himself by the Gospel. He died defending the Catholic faith. Secular Franciscans were often leaders in culture. Among them are great men and women such as Dante, Columbus, Pasteur, Pius X, John XXIII, Giotto, Rafael, Michelangelo, Ampere and Palestrina.
Today, the Secular Franciscans seem to shy away from taking on leadership roles in government, art, science, and other positions of social and cultural leadership. They tend to have become part of the crowd. It was not St. Francis’ idea that the Secular Brothers and Sisters be anonymous. His idea was that they be holy, but remain involved in the secular sphere, without becoming secularized. Secular Franciscans need to become more vocal and more present in the affairs of the world around them, to bring the Gospel to the places that religious Franciscans cannot go.
Here we are, on the eve of an election, one has to ask, why has the largest secular order in the Church not made a statemet about resposible citizenship and responsible voting. Did they even discuss it? They should be at the forefront of the Gospel of Life. There are many Secular Franciscans involved in the fight for life, but there is lacking a Franciscan presence. They should be present at abortuaries as fraternities. They should be guiding their secular brothers and sisters in the service of the poor, the sick, the dying and so forth. This is what the great Secular Franciscan saints did. Everyone knew they were Franciscan.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF