First Born undermined in Bible

  • Thread starter Thread starter CHRISTINE77
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CHRISTINE77

Guest
Why is the Old Testament so filled with younger brothers taking the first-born’s birth rite?

For example, God favor’s Abel over Cain, Jacob over Esau, Joseph over his brothers, Isaac over Ishmael, and David over his brothers.

Any one know the meaning behind this?
 
Why is the Old Testament so filled with younger brothers taking the first-born’s birth rite?

For example, God favor’s Abel over Cain, Jacob over Esau, Joseph over his brothers, Isaac over Ishmael, and David over his brothers.

Any one know the meaning behind this?
Don’t confuse next of kin with favored one.
 
Don’t confuse next of kin with favored one.
Huh? What do you mean by that?

The first born in Jewish culture should naturally inherit the favored position in the family. However, Jacob (second-born) stole Esau’s birthright, Isaac (second-born) inherited what should have been Ishmaels, David (last born) became King of Israel, Joseph (second-to-last born) lorded over this brothers, etc.

The natural inheritance was skewed, and it happens time and time again in the OT. Just wondering why this pattern?
 
Why is the Old Testament so filled with younger brothers taking the first-born’s birth rite?

For example, God favor’s Abel over Cain, Jacob over Esau, Joseph over his brothers, Isaac over Ishmael, and David over his brothers.

Any one know the meaning behind this?
God doesn’t always choose what to us would seem obvious.

Jacob stayed at home, obedient to his mother. This is the biblical image of one who is recollected to God in the interior of his heart and soul, making a home for God in himself and happy there, instead of being fascinated with things of the world and full of the lust of the eyes. He stays at home with his mother, who is the image of Mary, and does what she says without questioning.

Esau on the other hand, was strong and skilled as a hunter, and made much of his own skill and strength, relying on it at all times. He was full of the lust of the eyes, always roaming around the countryside looking for some game to kill or something to conquer. He was rarely at home, meaning that he was rarely recollected to God in the interior of his heart and made little space for God in the temple of his body. He never spent time with his mother and consequently, as the image of Mary, she showed him no favors.

It’s a lesson about lusting after things of the earth, reliance on ourselves, and not being obedient to and spending time with hour Blessed Mother in the image of Esau vs. the image of Jacob who is happy with God at home inside of himself, recollected, interior, prayerful, and the man who spends time with and who trusts and obeys Mary in all things. The latter hangs out at the adoration chapel with a miraculous medal around his neck and recieves a blessing from his Heavenly Father. The former hangs out at the bar trying to pick up chicks and reads Hot Rod magazine - he gets a plate of Ramen Noodles (- 😃 -) and is always in a rage.

-Tim-
 
Huh? What do you mean by that?

The first born in Jewish culture should naturally inherit the favored position in the family. However, Jacob (second-born) stole Esau’s birthright, Isaac (second-born) inherited what should have been Ishmaels, David (last born) became King of Israel, Joseph (second-to-last born) lorded over this brothers, etc.

The natural inheritance was skewed, and it happens time and time again in the OT. Just wondering why this pattern?
Stole?

Pehaps God’s hand was at work, removing from Esau what he really didn’t deserve.

Isaac trembled greatly. “Who was it, then,” he asked, “that hunted game and brought it to me? I ate it all just before you came, and I blessed him. Now he is blessed!” (Genesis 27:33)

Why was it that Isaac trembled. Maybe he saw God’s hand at work in his blessing of Jacob and was afraid? He didn’t take back the blessing, though perhaps he could have.

And who’s will was done? Who wanted Esau to be blessed and who wanted Jacob to be blessed and who got their way? Wasn’t it really Rebekah who caused her obedient and loving son Jacob to be blessed according to her own will? Though the father wanted one to be blessed, the mother’s will was done.

Something to think about.

-Tim-
 
+Ishmael was not the child of the promise of God to Abraham & Sarah . . . but the child of Hagar a concubine. In regard to the choosing and annointing of David as King of Israel from among the older sons of Jesse the Bethlemite. Upon one of the sons the Lord spoke the inditement below . . . which clarifies that given circumstance . . . and gives profound insight into God . . . our gracious Heavenly Father . . .

:bible1:
But the** LORD** said unto Samuel,
Look not on his countenance,
or on the height of his stature;
because I ****have refused him:
for the LORD seeth not as man seeth;
for man looketh on the outward appearance,
but the LORD looketh on the heart.
- I Samuel 16:7

+ Our God Reigns +
. . . all for Jesus+
. . . thank You Sweet Spirit of our God+​
 
Huh? What do you mean by that?

The first born in Jewish culture should naturally inherit the favored position in the family. However, Jacob (second-born) stole Esau’s birthright, Isaac (second-born) inherited what should have been Ishmaels, David (last born) became King of Israel, Joseph (second-to-last born) lorded over this brothers, etc.

The natural inheritance was skewed, and it happens time and time again in the OT. Just wondering why this pattern?
Here’s a thought: The Jews were favored for the kingdom of God yet it were the Gentiles that were accepted.
 
Why is the Old Testament so filled with younger brothers taking the first-born’s birth rite?

For example, God favor’s Abel over Cain, Jacob over Esau, Joseph over his brothers, Isaac over Ishmael, and David over his brothers.

Any one know the meaning behind this?
To me personally, the Old Testament is a foreshadowing of the New Testament. Almost a mirror image. If you find something in the OT, there is some kind of correlation in the NT.

Just one example.
OT water destroys in the flood.
NT: water saves in baptism.

Going with that line of thought one could equate the Judaism as the “first born” and Christianity as the younger brother.
 
To me personally, the Old Testament is a foreshadowing of the New Testament. Almost a mirror image. If you find something in the OT, there is some kind of correlation in the NT.

Just one example.
OT water destroys in the flood.
NT: water saves in baptism.

Going with that line of thought one could equate the Judaism as the “first born” and Christianity as the younger brother.
Maybe. None of these answers really hits the mark with me. I suppose it could be something along the lines of “The first shall be last and the last shall be first”, but I’m thinking that there is more to it.

It’s so pervasive in the Old Testament.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top