A few questions have risen since my post RE: The SSPX and fullfilling one’s Sunday obligation. A stated earlier, I am not a member of the SSPX. I attend an indult Traditional Latin Mass (Missal of 1962). The recent post to the Una Voce web site in which the full text from Rome is quoted, is exactly as I said earlier. One MAY fullfill one’s Sunday obligation in the “strict sense” of the word if doing so is due to devotion to the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) and if one does not hold to a schismatic mentality. Rome also went on to say that one may give financially at a SSPX Mass as one would at an indult TLM or at a Novus Ordo Mass. That’s all.
Next up: Regarding my use of the phrase “TLM”: Please. I know it is not a different rite. As a Traditionalist, I think I represent the vast majority of Traditionalist Catholics. I am fully faithful to the Holy Father and to the Magisterium. Were I to meet John Paul II, I would kneel to kiss the ring of the Vicar of Christ. I know who he is! I hold all 21 Church councils to be true councils of Holy Mother Church. However, I, like most Traditionalists, dislike the Novus Ordo (Mass of Paul VI) intensely. But I have NEVER, nor will I ever, call into question the validity of the Novus Ordo.
As a father, I have a tremendous responsibility to raise my children in the Faith. That being said, I have looked closely at the last 40 years and have seen nothing but disaster. The aftermath of the Second Vatican Council has lead to a massive decline in every area of the Church. Therefore, I raise my children with the Mass and the sacraments of their grandfather and ancestors, the Baltimore Catechism, the Douay-Rheims and the RSV-CE. Just because I do not want my children to endure “On Eagles Wings,” standing in line to receive in the hand from an EM or watch liturgical dancers, does not mean that I am disloyal or schismatic. I’m just a Roman Catholic (convert) who takes hold of the indult granted by the Holy Father. Hope that answers a few questions.
Semper Fi