First Youth Mass Tonight

  • Thread starter Thread starter St_Aloysius
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It may be useful to think why the Church has always been accepting of local cultures, and has positively encouraged the use of local musical culture. And then think do the same reasons apply to youth culture, or not?
 
agapewolf JPII stated that youth are their own culture.
When you mentioned JPII, Agapewolf, I remembered seeing one of his WYD videos. If you slide the scroll pointer to approx. 3.00 minutes, it demonstrates visibly the culture of youth. I would be utterly surprised, thinking one has to be a pure stoic, if he does not find himself lifted in joy, and even tapping his foot, although his idea of reverence might restrain him from clapping.

youtube.com/watch?v=S_s2W6DTVb8&feature=related

I also wonder how many adults were in this audience, and whether they felt intimidated by these kids’ exuberance? It would shock me if JPII were NOT to wear a broad smile and praise God along with them, in his heart. Otherwise, the first WYD’s would have been stopped dead before they were repeated. I wish the mass could have been taped so we could also observe their moments of quiet attention and perhaps other selections of music. This hymn seemed appropriate to begin the liturgy, but it isn’t perfectly clear from the video, other than you can see the priests in vesture as the song begins.

It is also very clear what one does NOT hear and see, and which is wrongly attributed to youth — is whistling, stomping, rolling in the aisles, etc. Obviously, so very many do know how to conduct themselves even in an open-air atmosphere, which is not even close to resembling a rock concert. 👍
 
JPII stated that youth are their own culture.
However, that is not defined in the true sense of the word. The way the liturgy understands the word “culture” is that it pertains to indigenous peoples, natives, if you will, of missionary territories. I am afraid that perhaps your reading of it stretches the late Holy Father’s definition. Someone tried to use that same argument with Cardinal Arinze to justify liturgical dance, and, that didn’t work.
 
Some more nice clips from World Youth Day:

youtube.com/watch?v=OzqdSs0sg00

Not everyone’s cup of tea, but clearly Benedict is fully behind World Youth Day.
I don’t think anyone here has said that our Holy Father wasn’t behind World Youth Day. However, I suspect that some of the music used for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass will get a makeover from the Holy Father.

It appears to me that you might be misinterpreting what’s been said. The concept of WYD is not the problem. Nor is LifeTeen, per se, the problem. What is problematic, however, is the innovations to (and departures from) the rubrics of the Mass, as well as certain types of music that are used. That is where the issue lies.
 
Tx Benedictgal

I realise what the issue is for some people. And I very much respect people’s desire to be able to attend a mass they consider fit.

I myself think there is a role for contemporary music in some mass settings; and I would pick events like World Youth Day (or the summer religious festivals) as examples where I think there’s is a role for contemporary worship songs as part of an extended worship that includes a mass. But I would never want to impose contemporary worship songs on anyone who finds it inappropriate.

The one area of contemporary worship I would feel recommending to all is Taize chant: I think it’s beautiful and wonderfully suited to a Catholic mass.
 
Tx Benedictgal

I realise what the issue is for some people. And I very much respect people’s desire to be able to attend a mass they consider fit.

I myself think there is a role for contemporary music in some mass settings; and I would pick events like World Youth Day (or the summer religious festivals) as examples where I think there’s is a role for contemporary worship songs as part of an extended worship that includes a mass. But I would never want to impose contemporary worship songs on anyone who finds it inappropriate.

The one area of contemporary worship I would feel recommending to all is Taize chant: I think it’s beautiful and wonderfully suited to a Catholic mass.
Although I don’t quite agree with the first half of your post, I certainly have no qualms about Taize chants. These are beautiful and can be conducive to prayer. Nonetheless, let’s see what will happen in Sydney, since George Cardinal Pell will be spearheading it and, now that Archbishop Marini is out as Papal MC, Pope Benedict’s people can have greater (name removed by moderator)ut on things.
 
The Mass is the Mass.
Really? Makes no difference? Then why the need for an indult Mass to minister to traditionalists? I personally see nothing wrong with ministering to anyone.
Furthermore, inculturation also refers to missionary instances.
I do not know that inculturation applies only to places with indigenous tribes. Has any document that talks about inculturation limit it thus? I know that missions are not limited to foreign missions. Some of our greatest need for missions lie in traditionally Catholic countries. South America is inundated by other religions and we must hold our own. I have oft thought it might be time for a major mission push to Europe. Of all places, that has become the most spiritual stagnant.
 
In trying to research the inculturation issue, I found some rather interesting remarks that Francis Cardinal Arinze made during a liturgical conference that are germaine to the discussion at hand:
…A do-it-yourself attitude is not acceptable in the public worship of the Church. It does damage to the Church’s worship and to the faith of the people. The people of God have the right that the liturgy be celebrated as the Church wants it. (cf RS 12) The mysteries of Christ should not be celebrated as personal taste or whim may indicate. “The ‘treasure’ is too important and precious to risk impoverishment or compromise through forms of experimentation or practices introduced without a careful review on the part of ecclesiastical authorities”. (EE 51)
The liturgy is not a field for self-expression, free creation and the demonstration of personal tastes. Idiosyncrasies tend to attract attention to the person rather than to the mysteries of Christ being celebrated. They can also upset, puzzle, annoy, mislead or confuse the congregation.
I consider “clapping” such an idiosyncrasy that really doesn’t have any place in the mass other than for a community’s affirmation of a candidate for ordination.

Here is another section of the speech:
Many priests are concerned with making the Eucharist celebration interesting. And they are not wrong. The Mass is not a dull carrying out of rituals. It is a vital celebration of the central mysteries of our salvation.
But when all is said and done, we have to come back to the fact that the Mass is not there to entertain people. Such horizontalism would be out of place. People do not come to Mass in order to admire the preacher, or the choir or the readers. ***The priority movement or direction of the Mass is vertical, toward God, not horizontal, toward one another. ***What the people need is a faith-filled celebration, a spiritual experience which draws them to God and therefore also to their neighbor. As a by-product, such a celebration will capture the people’s interest and attention.
The highlighted portion constitutes the crux of the problem. There is so much of a horizontal element that has crept into these Youth Masses that it tends to forget that the Mass is the Holy Sacrifice.
 
Many years ago when I was in the charismatic movement, we had Masses with plenty of clapping and praises. All were predominately vertical in spirit, not horizontal.

The direction of the Mass depends on the spirituality of the people in attendance, not the style of music they’re using.

I remember in the days before Vatican II, you could go to a TLM, where the direction was neither vertical or horizontal, but toward the back door, i.e. “how long is this priest going to take to say this Mass?”

Jim
 
Many years ago when I was in the charismatic movement, we had Masses with plenty of clapping and praises. All were predominately vertical in spirit, not horizontal.

The direction of the Mass depends on the spirituality of the people in attendance, not the style of music they’re using.

I remember in the days before Vatican II, you could go to a TLM, where the direction was neither vertical or horizontal, but toward the back door, i.e. “how long is this priest going to take to say this Mass?”

Jim
Unfortunately, the charismatic movement took excessive liberties within the Mass. Recall that along with hand-clapping, hand-holding during the Pater Noster was introduced.

It’s these innovations that do more harm than good.
 
Great quote by then Cardinal Ratzinger on the nature of the liturgy. Here is the LINK

"I confine myself to coming straight to this conclusion: we ought to get back the dimension of the sacred in the liturgy. The liturgy is not a festivity; it is not a meeting for the purpose of having a good time. It is of no importance that the parish priest has cudgeled his brains to come up with suggestive ideas or imaginative novelties. The liturgy is what makes the Thrice-Holy God present amongst us; it is the burning bush; it is the Alliance of God with man in Jesus Christ, who has died and risen again. The grandeur of the liturgy does not rest upon the fact that it offers an interesting entertainment, but in rendering tangible the Totally Other, whom we are not capable of summoning. He comes because He wills. In other words, the essential in the liturgy is the mystery, which is realized in the common ritual of the Church; all the rest diminishes it. Men experiment with it in lively fashion, and find themselves deceived, when the mystery is transformed into distraction, when the chief actor in the liturgy is not the Living God but the priest or the liturgical director. "

The Mass should be the Mass … not some theme mass like a Thursday night dinner on a cruise ship … “to keep it interesting with great music and entertainment.” The so-called “Bible Churches” have that: more like a Branson, MO country show than anything that remotely resembles sacredness. That’s all fine and good for the Parish hall … but not for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. What’s next? The 20-something Mass? The 40-50 year old with schoolage children Mass? The bass fishermen’s Mass?The senior Mass? You could go on and on…
 
I remember in the days before Vatican II, you could go to a TLM, where the direction was neither vertical or horizontal, but toward the back door, i.e. “how long is this priest going to take to say this Mass?”

Jim
That attitude is a reflection on the Mass-goer, not the Mass itself. Mass is not intended to be, not should it be, entertaining. You should be there to worship God and adore Him. If that takes 90 minutes instead of 45, then so what. Buy a TiVO and watch the game later. It all reflects the priorities of the person… the gall of some people to expect us to give God 90 minutes of our time each week! What’s God worth? only 45 minutes? maybe 60 minutes? I’m sure glad that Christ did not have that attitude while he hung on the cross and died an agonizing death for all of us.
 
How does any of this relate to the OP’s simple question as to whether or not clapping is permitted? It seems to me it has already been answered.
 
Unfortunately, the charismatic movement took excessive liberties within the Mass. Recall that along with hand-clapping, hand-holding during the Pater Noster was introduced.

It’s these innovations that do more harm than good.
Please tell us the harm that was done, that outweighed the good that was done?

Jim
 
Unfortunately, the charismatic movement took excessive liberties within the Mass. Recall that along with hand-clapping, hand-holding during the Pater Noster was introduced.

It’s these innovations that do more harm than good.
There is no evidence that holding hands came from the charismatic renewal. There are many, many theories about where it came from but no one has produced any defiinitive evidence of any single source. There is at least one poster that says he was aware of it already in the late 60’s when the Pauline Mass was introduced, which predates the Charismatic Renewal and would seem to preclude that it originated there.

Addtionally it is strictly an opinion that holding hands in any way does “harm”, not to mention totally off topic.
 
Please tell us the harm that was done, that outweighed the good that was done?

Jim
Liturgical innovations such as clapping and hand-holding during the Pater Noster put the focus more on the horizontal rather than the vertical. Perhaps you should re-read Roman Revert’s citation of the former Cardinal Ratzinger’s quote on the matter. The Holy Father certainly drives that point home.
we ought to get back the dimension of the sacred in the liturgy. The liturgy is not a festivity; it is not a meeting for the purpose of having a good time. It is of no importance that the parish priest has cudgeled his brains to come up with suggestive ideas or imaginative novelties. The liturgy is what makes the Thrice-Holy God present amongst us; it is the burning bush; it is the Alliance of God with man in Jesus Christ, who has died and risen again. The grandeur of the liturgy does not rest upon the fact that it offers an interesting entertainment, but in rendering tangible the Totally Other, whom we are not capable of summoning. He comes because He wills. In other words, the essential in the liturgy is the mystery, which is realized in the common ritual of the Church; all the rest diminishes it. Men experiment with it in lively fashion, and find themselves deceived, when the mystery is transformed into distraction, when the chief actor in the liturgy is not the Living God but the priest or the liturgical director. "
The Mass is not something that we cobble up for ourselves, nor is it meant to be some feel-good experience. The Charismatic movement’s innovations have done nothing but take away the solemnity and the divinity of the Mass and replace it with something that reduces it to a rush of feelings.
 
There is so much of a horizontal element that has crept into these Youth Masses that it tends to forget that the Mass is the Holy Sacrifice.
I doubt that your “research” has included an analysis of every “youth” mass in the the worldwide church or even within the US. You are using unproven generalities in support of your position that I find offensive.

Please don’t assume that every or even most “youth” masses have a problem with focusing on the Holy Sacrifice because you do not know this for a fact. Perhaps you have experienced this at however many masses you have attended, but this has not been proven to reflect the reality of the entire church. It does not even reflect my experience of these masses and I’m in a large metro area that has many parishes with Lifeteen.
 
Liturgical innovations such as clapping and hand-holding during the Pater Noster put the focus more on the horizontal rather than the vertical. Perhaps you should re-read Roman Revert’s citation of the former Cardinal Ratzinger’s quote on the matter. The Holy Father certainly drives that point home.

The Mass is not something that we cobble up for ourselves, nor is it meant to be some feel-good experience. The Charismatic movement’s innovations have done nothing but take away the solemnity and the divinity of the Mass and replace it with something that reduces it to a rush of feelings.
Amen sister!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top