Do you know of another site that would provide good solid traditionalist information without the SSPX and Sede information?I refer to it often for certain subjects, however, I follow Rome and the site contains a lot of SSPX and Sede information. I find that the forums are filled with those who have decided to see themselves separate from Rome (among others).
Good information is contained within the site, but in my opinion, a lot of it crosses ‘the’ line.
Kelly
That site helped me learn how to chant the Pater Noster!More than once I have heard FishEaters.com described as a dissentists website.
Opinions?
I see it as a way to learn about Traditionalism, and more as a springboard to bigger and better things.
I dont know about any sedevacantist content. The woman who runs the site says this in her FAQ:I second that.
The site is great, I learned some stuff on that.
Just avoid those parts that seem to lean on Sedevacantism and such.
As for Gregorian Chant, this site has lots of recordings (Most of the Kyriale is there).
christusrex.org/www2/cantgreg/index_eng.html
I believe each and every point of dogma in the Nicene Creed in the same manner the Church has always understood them. I believe each and every solemnly defined dogma ever offered by any Pope or Council, and fully agree with each statement given in Sacrorum Antistitum.
I believe Vatican II was a valid, pastoral Ecumenical Council convoked and approbated by true Popes. I believe the documents from the Council were badly and ambiguously written and that said documents need to be interpreted only in light of tradition.
I believe that Benedict XVI is the true Pope and that we must pray for him and his Bishops every day.
I guess I used the wrong choice of words then. Sorry.I dont know about any sedevacantist content. The woman who runs the site says this in her FAQ:
I also disagree with the content of certain articles but what is objectionable about that? It happened, no?I guess I used the wrong choice of words then. Sorry.
But there are a few articles of questionable content such as this:
fisheaters.com/ewtnedit.html
I guess thankfully that website, while it has some parts that needs caution, is really helpful. Just take it with a grain of salt.
I looked at that article and I was disappointed at the priest calling the NO mass as a complete fabrication. It doesn’t surprise me why certain people who patronize the website and other similar sites shamelessly parrot the same tired line about the NO mass, a valid and legitimate liturgy of the Church. Catholics who patronize this site should in my opinion be more discriminating: Assimilate what is true but throw out what is false or questionable.I guess I used the wrong choice of words then. Sorry.
But there are a few articles of questionable content such as this:
fisheaters.com/ewtnedit.html
I guess thankfully that website, while it has some parts that needs caution, is really helpful. Just take it with a grain of salt.
Why are you dissapointed? That is a fact. The Novus ordo is indeed a fabrication.I looked at that article and I was disappointed at the priest calling the NO mass as a complete fabrication.
Based on what evidence? There’s nothing independently verifiable about the Fisheaters allegation that the answer was changed or edited for starters.I also disagree with the content of certain articles but what is objectionable about that? It happened, no?
If he really did say this (and you have completely misread Spirit of the Liturgy and his other writings on the topic) he would have restored the Tridentine Mass the day of his election, and of course branded each of the 3 previous popes as heretics.Why are you dissapointed? That is a fact. The Novus ordo is indeed a fabrication.
The Holy Fatehr, as Cardinal Ratzinger said so himself.
Think about what you say.If he really did say this (and you have completely misread Spirit of the Liturgy and his other writings on the topic) he would have restored the Tridentine Mass the day of his election, and of course branded each of the 3 previous popes as heretics.
No he wouldn’t. Because:If he really did say this (and you have completely misread Spirit of the Liturgy and his other writings on the topic) he would have restored the Tridentine Mass the day of his election, and of course branded each of the 3 previous popes as heretics.
Do you think that Fisheaters may have faked the screenshots?There’s nothing independently verifiable about the Fisheaters allegation that the answer was changed or edited for starters.