S
stevegravy
Guest
Didn’t say they were, just don’t apologize the perpetually offended.
Not at all.But in the present day the situation is reversed. And the current voting patterns reflect that present reality.
Don’t forget Chicago as an example of a problematic Democratic run city!dvdjs:![]()
Not at all.But in the present day the situation is reversed. And the current voting patterns reflect that present reality.
Why does the Democratic party hold up Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood up in such high esteem? Why are black children 5 times more likely than white children to be aborted? Her writings are thought by many to be racist. Black pro-lifers such as Reverend Childress says this is even worse than the Klan. Read any black pro-life website and they will tell you this.
Why are there examples of Democratically run cities that are so problematic? Baltimore? Detroit?
And plenty of modern statements that are racist can be found on the Democratic party, especially anti-Semitic statements.
You’re argument too, has to be said is a lazy argument, anyone can say “roles are reversed now”, you provided no back up at all.
As long as the Democratic party maintains Planned Parenthood, upholds Margaret Sanger and sees the pro-choice movement as one of their main special interests, I don’t think anything has changed. Anyone can confirm this by going to any black pro-life website where they have her quotes and report on stats such as black children being 5 times, maybe only 3 times more likely to be aborted than a white child.Yes, the Democratic Party used to be the party of conservatives. Slavery was, after all, the tradition. The Democrats were upholding traditional Southern values by fighting for slavery and opposing these new-fangled ideas of giving political and economic power to former slaves. The Republicans have a proud history of progressive ideas like abolition of slavery, and equal rights.
Some time in the early 20th century a realignment began. The realignment culminated with the election of Ronald Reagan. The Republican Party had become the party of conservatives and the Democratic Party became the party of liberals. Keep that in mind whenever you refer to history to justify your view of today’s political parties.
The voting demographic patterns speak for themselves.Not at all.
This is silly. Because we don’t have slavery today is the conservative position today one of anti-slavery and the Progressive one of slavery?Yes, the Democratic Party used to be the party of conservatives. Slavery was, after all, the tradition.
Exactly! And Democrat and Republican today is not what it was 150 years ago, which is why it is so strange to see today’s parties being evaluated by what the parties that shared those names 150 years ago were like.Yes, but by the time Ronald Reagan was
elected, the Civil War had been fought long ago.
Conservatism and liberalism today is not what it was over 150 years ago.
So does Johnson’s welfare program.The voting demographic patterns speak for themselves.
So, blacks have historically low unemployment under Trump.Exactly! And Democrat and Republican today is not what it was 150 years ago, which is why it is so strange to see today’s parties being evaluated by what the parties that shared those names 150 years ago were like.
Does the historically low crime rate in cities likr New York, run by Democrats, speak for itself?So does the high crime rate in cities run by Democrats.
I think those speaking up for the Democrat party but not addressing the right to life and blacks aborting their own at 3 to 5 times higher than whites speaks for itself? Don’t you?Does the historically low crime rate in cities likr New York, run by Democrats, speak for itself?
Okay, I get it. You’re going to dodge the question.I think those speaking up for the Democrat party but not addressing the right to life and blacks aborting their own at 3 to 5 times higher than whites speaks for itself? Don’t you?
That describes every political party ever.dvdjs:![]()
The Democratic Party is and always has been about raw political power and have opportunistically been on the side that could leverage votes…JonNC:![]()
But in the present day the situation is reversed. And the current voting patterns reflect that present reality.My identification of racism to the Democratic Party reflects historic fact
One who is more sympathetic to the Democratic party would say this shows that Democrats today are better at representing people who live in deplorable conditions, whereas Republicans are better at representing people who are living more comfortably.Just look at the jurisdictions where the Dems have held power for decades – most are disasters especially for the minorities the Dems claim to champion.
Zero evidence only if you ignore history.LeafByNiggle:![]()
It makes a nice narrative for current Democrats. The problem is that there is virtually zero evidence for it being true.Some time in the early 20th century a realignment began. The realignment culminated with the election of Ronald Reagan. The Republican Party had become the party of conservatives and the Democratic Party became the party of liberals. Keep that in mind whenever you refer to history to justify your view of today’s political parties.
They are the only ones who admit to recognizing them.AuldP:![]()
Why are Democrats the only people who can hear them?It refers to the use of words or phrases that may seem innocent to most people but that have a different, more sinister or racist tone with others.
Some of her writings were definitely racist. And Margaret Sanger is not held in such high esteem by Democrats in everything she wrote.dvdjs:![]()
Not at all.But in the present day the situation is reversed. And the current voting patterns reflect that present reality.
Why does the Democratic party hold up Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood up in such high esteem? Why are black children 5 times more likely than white children to be aborted? Her writings are thought by many to be racist.
As I explained earlier, high population density cities tend to have problems that rural populations do not have. And Democrats appear to be better at representing people with those problems.Why are there examples of Democratically run cities that are so problematic? Baltimore? Detroit?
No, there aren’t. Not at the Party Platform level. And it is not common at the grass roots level either.And plenty of modern statements that are racist can be found on the Democratic party, especially anti-Semitic statements.
Here is your backup.You’re argument too, has to be said is a lazy argument, anyone can say “roles are reversed now”, you provided no back up at all.
Can you show me an example of a Republican run city of similar population density that is not problematic?Don’t forget Chicago as an example of a problematic Democratic run city!