A
Al_Masetti
Guest
Having worked for two bureaucracies … I would say yes.You believe that across the board, Al? Does that apply to America’s military, too? Does that apply to NASA? Does that apply to the interstate highway system? Does that apply to nuclear technology? The Manhattan project didn’t just give us the A-bomb it also gave us the knowledge of how to do nulcear generation.
It seems to me that when there is a national focus directed to solving a problem/crises the government can do quit well at getting things done. It’s when the Houses and Administration kiss up to constituent interests that are less than altruistic such as the ones I listed above is where the government screws up. The midwest corn growers love ethanol no matter how irrational it is as a gasoiline replacement is what I’d consider an example.
[There have been exceptions … the military rescue work in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina was better than exemplary. The Navy and Air Force and other services were there within minutes, but got no credit for it. I will even give the FAA credit for their work at the Katrina recovery in getting the regional airports operation under difficult circumstances.]
The U.S. military works, to the extent that it does, because of the sacrifice of junior enlisted and junior officer personnel. Then they burn out and quit.
Military procurement is a scandal because of the inordinate length of time and inordinate cost required for most items. I will make that categorical statement. Take a look at the achievements of the Lockheed Skunk Works and how amazed the military is when they make their stunning accomplishments. The F-80 Shooting Star; the C-130 still in production … by the way the C-130"J" model was a private venture and the U.S. Air Force hated it. It was only after Lockheed sold it to the Brits and everyone else [including the U.S. Marine Corps ] … who loved its vastly improved performance … did the U.S. Air Force finally reluctantly accept the plane. The F-104. The SR-71 Blackbird. The F-117 stealth fighter. These are just the known examples. Totally done outside the “system” by the Skunk Works. Look up the Skunk Works. I wrote an article about it; if you want I’ll send you a copy privately.
There used to be something called Quick Response Contracts … vendors were given 30-days to deliver combat hardware. Best information is that the QRC program … very successful … no longer exists.
The list of private sector successes goes on and on. Bureaucratic “mess-ups” goes on and on. Been that way for a very long time.
The P-51 Mustang, famed fighter of WW2, was a private venture by North American Aviation … and offered to the Brits who accepted it. The U.S. Army Air Corps reluctantly bought the plane.
Look up John Boyd. He’s on Wiki. The bureaucracy HATED John Boyd.
The famous F-16 “Viper” only came about because of the work of John Boyd who was a complete pariah within the Pentagon bureaucracy. Check him out. He pushed for a competition that produced two competing prototypes: the YF-16 and the YF-17. We know about how the YF-16 morphed into the now famous F-16. What folks don’t know is that the YF-17 evolved from the F-5 which evolved from the T-38. AND, after the YF-17 lost the competition, it morphed into the F/A-18 which is now in production for the U.S. Navy. The latest variation is the EF-18G, the Growler, intended to be the latest jammer plane. The Air Force used to have a jammer … the EF-111A. It was great. Worked just fine. The F-111 airframe is STILL in use with the Australian Air Force. But, the bureaucrats wanted it gone, so they simply transferred the two colonels assigned to prepare the budget for the EF-111A. And so with no budget it was gone.
In Bosnia, when the F-117 stealth fighter was used, it did need some jamming support. But the Air Force no longer had the EF-111A. There were some EA-6B Navy jammer planes, but they were slow. And the A-6 jammers had a problem with wing cracks. There were supposed to be fixes, but the program was cancelled and the airframes were turned into fish reefs.
So … one day, an F-117 stealth fighter was successfully tracked and shot down. AND it ended up shipped to the Soviet Union … and that’s how the Russians got our stealth technology.
I can go on and on. The whole C-17 mess. The C-5 upgrade mess. The aerial refueling plane mess.
I’m more familiar with Air Force stuff. But it goes on all over the place. The bureaucracy’s resistance to the MRAP vehicle because it was designed in South Africa. The whole mess with the HUMVEES being “uparmored” against IED’s. We had vehicles that would have worked … the M-113 was on hand … about 13,000 of them. The resistance by the military bureaucracy to Petraeus’ surge (and the Petraeus change in tactics).
The Interstate Highway System was supposed to be the National Defense Highway System. The bureaucracy reduced the heights of the overpasses, so that while it was intended to let overheight military equipment be transported, the system as built has restricted heights. In addition, the original idea was that the structures (bridges) were supposed to contain bomb shelters for the civilian population, but the bureaucrats deleted those also.
With respect to nuclear weapos, South Africa built their nuke in complete secrecy with a very small group of people for a tiny fraction of the cost of what it cost the United States. Read Richelson’s book “Spying on the Bomb”.
Don’t get me started.