J
johnnykins
Guest
Actually, I think the heterodox are heterodox. I’ve personally known many vowed religious who most certainly are heterodox. I’ve known many vowed religious, too, who are orthodox. My point is that the vowed religious life separated from orthodoxy is nothing more than social work (teaching, nursing whatever) in bad clothes without sex or a family. As for vowed religious who hate the Church, try reading National Catholic Reporter if you don’t personally know any. You ask why they stay? I frankly do not know. Cowardice or a reluctance to admit their abject failure in transmitting their charism is my guess. (Again, what sort of charism do they have? A bitter, ill dressed lifestyle that they fail to animate through orthodoxy) It’s clear they are attracting no one to their life style. As to what’s been done, consider what’s been squandered over the last 45 years. Like it or not, they fail to see that the choices and persons who have run these orders over the last 45 years have substantially destroyed what was built by their orthodox forebears. That, my friend, is the fact. Your use of the past tense tells it all.You’re inventing a lifestyle that is unrecognizable to most religious women. Most religious orders of women are active, not contemplative. Active religous orders, whether they wear habits or not, care for the young, the sick, the abandoned and they always have. You can call them teachers or social workers, but they are committed to the Christ and to the gospel. Some have been active in seeking change not only in society but also in the Church. You seem to think that anyone who does so is heterodox and opposed to the Church, but most of the religious women I know are deeply, deeply committed to the Church and to Christ. Frankly, that’s the central meaning of their lives. For why else would they remain vowed and work with those no one else wants to serve? They built schools and hospitals, ran universities, staffed soup kitchens, shelters, and other services for unwed or abused mothers, street people, the handicapped, all in the name of Christ. Sounds like the Lord’s work to me.
You recall, don’t you, that religious like Francis, Ignatius, Teresa of Avila and many others were constantly opposed by priests and bishops who found their brand of Christianity too challenging? A lot of religous women in the U.S. have been used and abused by their bishops and have managed to survive and thrive despite Church leadership, not because of it.