J
Joseph_L_Varga
Guest
Brother, you arguments would be thrown right out the window by any scientific jury or legal court. What do you mean by “illness”? The flu? Upset stomach, headache? The morning after sickness after too much partying? Testicular cancer with metastases to the brain, post radiation and chemotherapy? What kind of chemotherapy? Was the testicular cancer hormone-dependent? Liposarcoma, recurrence of metastases to the lung, within one year of surgery and radiation therapy, and then spontaneous regression with no treatment at all?Some times people recover from illness, this is a statistical fact.. That fact that some of them might pray means nothing.
Let me put is to you this way, why does god never cure amputees?
“Illness” without specifics just doesn’t cut it. At least not for serious investigators.
How about the doctor, the oncologist who treated this Hawaiian lady? He is a specialist in the field, and he was baffled by what happened. Are YOU a specialist in oncology?
And the same holds true with the bomb explosion inside the Cathedral of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City, in 1921. I gave you details. Did you make ANY effort to reconstruct the situation in your mind and understand the details? Those who investigated the facts, in details, yes they investigated them scientifically, and concluded there was no natural explanation. You on the other hand, didn’t bother to study the details. Therefore, your hasty conclusions are useless. Thanks God detectives and forensic scientists are being taught a different work ethics (and mostly they do have a different work ethics - they pay attention to the details).