K
Kolbe300
Guest
Feel better? While I enjoy dialogue, I got only as far as the false syllogism before realizing this communication is, once again, not working. I don’t believe God made “gay”. But what’s the point in saying so, right? Anyways, while I do enjoy discussion, your posts seem more of an effort in sarcasm and self righteousness than any actual form of serious dialogue. However, I could be completely misinterpreting your post, which would be par for the course here on CAF.I don’t think people should seek counseling from strangers on the internet in the first place.
In the specific sense, yes, in the same way that many, many aspects of individual human characteristics arise mysteriously. In the general, the Church has always been very clear about the genesis of all imperfection in creation, which is original sin. Plenty of threads about the Fall and original sin on here, no need to rehash all of that, but the point is that the Church does not allow the necessary wiggle room to start using some of the terminology that you use below.
Well, they’re right, but you’re (I think willfully) leaving out the Catholic narrative about “the beginning of the world and how all this stuff went wrong in the first place”. You’re forming a false syllogism:
“I am gay”
“God made me”
“therefore, God made gay and God can’t make evil”
“therefore, gay (the orientation) is not evil”
(You appear to add the addendum “therefore gay is beautiful”, but whatever)
This is a false syllogism, it presumes that all aspects of our human person were directly willed by God. Not so. It would more accurately go:
Long story short - what’s the point?
It has been fun everyone! Enjoy your week!
Peace!