N
nancy_dalrymple
Guest
I have found alot of people hre that sounded hostile to me but I think that is not realy the word i think we just dont undrstand each other and the wording is sometimes hard for me. All the laws you have o learn it is realy amazing realy for other churches only teach the ible, and they do teach that abortin is wrong but I ahve never herd the other things you all bring up. You would have to learn fom very young to realy grasp it all .or have a church that teaches differnt subjects one at a time so not to confuse surely there must be an order for all this? I was chalanged to work on a farm once because i was the city girl, I did l did learn alot in one day and i did do a good job thruogh pere pressure. i learnd about artificial insemination and i felt sorry for the bull because all he knew was a stimulation trick they do to get the seamen from the bull and the cow only can relate to the man that does the insemination, they don’t knw there opposit sex and i am so very against this, i feel it is so wrong to take something that should be natural and make it a control issue. i stopped going to the farm after that. then thay starte using a chemical to produce milk faster when the holstine is the hardest worker of milkers already. now the farmer gets more milk but the animal’s life expectincy is cut short. it’s like a drug there are alway’s side effects like abortion. you reap what you sow. I want to thank you for the information, OH I agree with alot but the only thing I have trouble with is believing that a man can understand all about life of men and woman and he is not married and has never been there to experience it. that right now in my walk is the hardest for me to understand. And a fw laws to. love of Christ NancyYou sound very hostile.
The Catechism is available online for you to read at your own pace.
Here is the section on artificial insemination:
scborromeo.org/ccc/p3s2c2a6.htm#2376
2376 Techniques that entail the dissociation of husband and wife, by the intrusion of a person other than the couple (donation of sperm or ovum, surrogate uterus), are gravely immoral. These techniques (heterologous artificial insemination and fertilization) infringe the child’s right to be born of a father and mother known to him and bound to each other by marriage. They betray the spouses’ "right to become a father and a mother only through each other."167
2377 Techniques involving only the married couple (homologous artificial insemination and fertilization) are perhaps less reprehensible, yet remain morally unacceptable. They dissociate the sexual act from the procreative act. The act which brings the child into existence is no longer an act by which two persons give themselves to one another, but one that "entrusts the life and identity of the embryo into the power of doctors and biologists and establishes the domination of technology over the origin and destiny of the human person. Such a relationship of domination is in itself contrary to the dignity and equality that must be common to parents and children."168
"Under the moral aspect procreation is deprived of its proper perfection when it is not willed as the fruit of the conjugal act, that is to say, of the specific act of the spouses’ union . . . . Only respect for the link between the meanings of the conjugal act and respect for the unity of the human being make possible procreation in conformity with the dignity of the person."169
2378 A child is not something *owed *to one, but is a gift. The “supreme gift of marriage” is a human person. A child may not be considered a piece of property, an idea to which an alleged “right to a child” would lead. In this area, only the child possesses genuine rights: the right “to be the fruit of the specific act of the conjugal love of his parents,” and "the right to be respected as a person from the moment of his conception."170