Fair enough but if your understanding can change once before, is it possible it could change back?
NO, because there is a big difference between now and then.
Sense you have left out any reference to the Eucharist in the Holy Mass, I would like to ask if you did/do believe in the real presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist?
Peace!!!
I know the Catholic doctrine teaches that there is real presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist.
My view is based on the bible and the history of the doctrine. According to the Bible, Jesus instituted the Lord’s table as a church practice in His remembrance. He ate the bread and drunk the wine symbolically as his body and blood. The apostles including Mary the mother of Jesus met daily and broke bread together in remembrance of Jesus.
Apostle Paul also taught about the Lord’s table to the churches. A record is in the letter to Corinthians. His teaching is not that Jesus is present in the Eucharist.
On the link:
blessedquietness.com/journal/housechu/transub.htm
According to the church history, prior to the Council of Nicene (325 AD ), and shortly there after, the belief of transubstantiation was totally unknown. There is no written record describing or acknowledging the existence of this doctrine.
Transubstantiation as a term, was apparently first used by the archbishop of Tours, Hildebert of Lavardin (1056 - 1133 AD ). The doctrine was authoritatively declared to be the faith of the church at a council held in Rome under Pope Gregory VII in 1079, and again in the Fourth Lateran Council. In 1215 AD, at the Fourth Lateran Council under Pope Innocent III, the doctrine of transubstantiation was reaffirmed as an article of faith, or creed to be believed in without question.
This is where the differences start to emerge. This teaching was adopted by the Catholic Church after a millennium. There doesn’t seem to have been a big dispute of believe to declare it a dogma.
If we review the teaching from the time of Jesus, the apostles first ate the bread and drunk the wine while with Jesus literally. Jesus also ate the bread and drunk the wine. If he was in it, then he ate his own body and drunk his own blood. His mother Mary, would not have taken it kindly to be eating his son every day.
It is not biblical to eat God/Jesus as taught in the doctrine of transubstantiation. The Holy Spirit indwells in us as it was on the day of Pentecost, and as per the new covenant.