R
rpp
Guest
The vast majority of threads here stay on topic. Those that do not are closed. Stay on topic.rpp, how many topics actually stay on topic?![]()
The vast majority of threads here stay on topic. Those that do not are closed. Stay on topic.rpp, how many topics actually stay on topic?![]()
Ok, I got to respond to this before I leave.âSince Islam has a dualistic logic and dualistic ethics, it is completely foreign to us. Muslims think differently from us and feel differently from us. So our aversion is based upon fear and a rejection of Islamic ethics and logic. This aversion causes us to avoid learning about Islam so we are ignorant and stay ignorant.
âAnother part of the aversion is the realization that there is no compromise with dualistic ethics. There is no halfway place between unitary ethics and dualistic ethics. If you are in a business deal with someone who is a liar and a cheat, there is no way to avoid getting cheated. No matter how nice you are to a con man, he will take advantage of you. ⌠In short, Islamic politics, ethics, and logic cannot be part of our civilization. Islam does not assimilate; it dominates. There is never any âgetting alongâ with Islam. Its demands never cease, and the demands must be met on Islamâs terms: submission.â
Ref: âThe Study of Political Islamâ
By Bill Warner
frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26769
Of course, this pre-supposes the existence of an enemy. Too many people deny it exists.I believe in âknowing my enemyâ.
Iâm just entering this thread now, and I donât really plan to read pages upon pages of people bashing Muslims at large or Islam, when in fact there is one man who has committed a truly awful and evil crime, something which is neither honorable nor justifiable in Islam, but what is a horrible culmination of domestic abuse.Valentineâs day is NOT the only day that we are supposed to show our love. In fact, that is not the reason the day exists in the first place.
While I will grant that he has not been convicted, they generally do not put that information out there unless he is to be charged. If he is charged, it means that they feel the evidence is enough to convict him beyond a resonable doubt. Letâs set that aside for a minute.
The undisputed facts are that a Muslim Woman filed for divorce from her Muslim Husband. She was so afraid of him that she filed for court ordered protection, which was supposed to make him understand that he had to stay away from her. The woman ended up dead in a very strange way to Westerners, and he is the one who reported it.
I will bet anyone who is willing that he claims it was a culturally and religiously acceptable honor killing and that he should be allowed to do it as a free practice of his faith.
Iâm just entering this thread now, and I donât really plan to read pages upon pages of people bashing Muslims at large or Islam, when in fact there is one man who has committed a truly awful and evil crime, something which is neither honorable nor justifiable in Islam, but what is a horrible culmination of domestic abuse.
Domestic violence and abuse is wrong whichever way you slice it. There is no justification for this act in Islam.
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=4834580#post4834580What Is Islam About?
âŚ
Islam is a total way of life. It covers everything from sleeping to waking, lying down to sitting and standing, as well as eating and drinking and sex. Every action performed by a Muslim, one who follows Islam, should be an act of worship of God.
I donât see Muslim Woman condoning domestic abuse. Do you?
Beheading your victim doesnât seem to be a ârandomâ type of âpunishmentâ among Muslims.Saying that everything that a random Muslim does is part of Islam is wholly ridiculous.
I am glad that you posted this. I really am, because I know that you mean it.Iâm just entering this thread now, and I donât really plan to read pages upon pages of people bashing Muslims at large or Islam, when in fact there is one man who has committed a truly awful and evil crime, something which is neither honorable nor justifiable in Islam, but what is a horrible culmination of domestic abuse.
Domestic violence and abuse is wrong whichever way you slice it. There is no justification for this act in Islam.
I will take on, personally, ANYONE who tries to use islam to justify this evil.
TouchĂŠ, Monsieur Pussycat !Totally hypothetical, but if this was in your area, and he tried to use the âHonor Killing is allowed in Islam defense,â would you be willing to contact the prosecutor and state the truth? Or appear on TV refuting it?
Here is logical proof that Islam lacks a concept of the Golden Rule and therefore is a false dogma, a heresy:âŚminority people suffer more or less almost in all countries . In the West specially USA , Muslims are criminals unless proven innocent.
Suppose, just suppose that non-Muslims adopted Islamâs philosophy described by planten and treated Muslims as he would treat kafirs/unbleivers? Suppose the Bible said,Any one and every one who has not uttered the Kalima [the Muslim oath] is not a Kafir. Only those to whom the message of Islam is presented peacefully and given enough time to understand it, if they (or He) tries to not believe and tries to fight the Muslims and Islam and wages war against Islam and does not let others believe, he is a Kafir, described in the verses in a lose [loose] manner as a disbeliever.
He is not a simple disbeliever but a fanatic hostile disbeliever in Islam.
H]e deserves to be killed because he is already on war path against Islam. What problem do you have against the enemies. We do not believe in your false theory of âLove thy enemyâ. We can be kind to the enemy depending on the situation if kindness will help him to improve his ways.
If our kindness will spoil him more then we will not be kind with him. This our teaching is different to the teaching of the church âLove thy enemyâ⌠Nobody can always do that and it is not fair to love all the enemies all the time.
She and Sister Amy also complain about the way they are treated on this forum.In the West specially USA , Muslims are criminals unless proven innocent.
uuhh, I think you gave them a headache and they all scurried away with your question. I get that same reaction when I bring up their religionâs predestination.Here is logical proof that Islam lacks a concept of the Golden Rule and therefore is a false dogma, a heresy:
Suppose, just suppose that non-Muslims adopted Islamâs philosophy described by planten and treated Muslims as he would treat kafirs/unbleivers? Suppose the Bible said,
Any one and every one who has not been baptized is not a [Hated, or fill in some other worse word in the human language] one. Only those to whom the message of Christianity is presented peacefully and given enough time to understand it, if they (or He) tries to not believe and tries to fight the Christians and Truth and wages war against Truth and does not let others believe, he is a [Hated, or fill in some other worse word in the human language] one, described in the verses in a lose [loose] manner as a disbeliever [or heretic].
He is not a simple disbeliever but a fanatic hostile disbeliever [or heretic] in Christianity.
[H]e deserves to be killed because he is already on war path against Christianity. What problem do you have against the enemies. We do not believe in your false theory of âwish for your brotherâ. We can be kind to the enemy depending on the situation if kindness will help him to improve his ways.
If our kindness will spoil him more then we will not be kind with him. This our teaching is different to the teaching of the Qurâan " wish for your brother"⌠Nobody can always do that and it is not fair to love all the enemies all the time.
?
Then there are the much maligned Crusades. If what planten says is true about Islamic beliefs, Muslims have no complaint about the Crusades; what goes around comes around. You have to expect back what you dish out.
Then Musim Woman complains that,
She and Sister Amy also complain about the way they are treated on this forum.
Now arenât these simply a desire to be treated the same as others are treated, i.e., with human dignity? How can they expect equal treatment if they donât believe in treating others as they wishes to be treated?
Do Muslims possess sufficient abstract thought to see that they are complaining about the exact thing they are advocating, and what the world would be like if everyone treated âThe Otherâ as kafirs?
Wouldnât the Islamic way be just a peachy keen way to run the world? How can there be âpeaceâ if Islam treats even some of its own like kafirs?
Thank you for you judgement, it must be nice to be a perfect Catholic.From the forum rules
The thing is that term doesnât even apply. A troll is some one that posts just to get a reaction and sits back and watches the show. Since she has over 1800 posts, she is not a troll.
I have been shocked by the general lack of decorum and manners by the Catholics who post have posted on this thread. Perhaps not all who claim to be Catholic really are, but I find it hard to believe that Catholics can not disagree and remain charitable at the same time.
Firstly I do not hate you, I donât know you. It is your ideology I hate, it is your opinions that I am debating, and at times find very distatesful. THIS IS NOT ABOUT YOU, Muslim Woman.You are most welcome to hate me & post any images in your posts replying to me. But u should not add anything in my or someone elseâs posts.
I am drawing attention of Forum Admin about this matter. chrisse did it earlier more than once . I requested her not to do it but she is still doing it.
http://theislampath.com/smf/Smileys/default/salam.gif
** In the name of Allah , the Most Gracious , Ever Merciful **
I visited India few years ago & heard that itâs prohibited to slaughter cows. May be , itâs allowed only in few places , not everywhere .
.
Examples are the muslim countries.http://theislampath.com/smf/Smileys/default/salam.gif
minority people suffer more or less almost in all countries . In the West specially USA , Muslims are criminals unless proven innocent.
In muslim countries non-muslims are not allwed to eat publicly during rozas. All eateries are closed, even those run by non muslims.In Nepal & India , Muslims are not allowed to eat cow meat as Hindus worship cows
Must be some pocket spread over India and Nepal. Lols.though itâs not the teaching of their holiest book Veda but a local tradition.
It is even worse than that - muslims are DEMANDING in our own countries that WE CHANGE our eating habits because of their religion!I visted Pakistan a few years and found that it is an offence to even enquire if I could have pork.
Leave that to Hindus to decide.
How many muslim countries permit slaughter of a pig or sale of pork?