Founder of "Positive" Muslim TV Channel charged with beheading wife...

[agnostic_in_ist]

I’m calling this “ryan” out as a muslim.

He is flip-flopping. Typical mohammaden behaviour.

He’s on ignore now.

Update: This freak is all over the map! Now he’s spewing anti-Jewish hate.

I just took a gander at his older posts. First he’s Christian, than he’s athiest, then he’s pro-muslim “but not muslim.”

You’re right, Chrisse, he’s just a nut-job troll.

And exactly the kind of sicko that islam lures into conversion.

 

[chrisse]

We can’t judge another culture. Then they could judge ours and then we would be left splitting hairs about the Crusades. It’s not in God’s Path to make judgment calls like that.

Ryan29, please go here♠ and check out the culture you can’t judge.

 

[Ryan29]

Americans shouldn’t worry as much about Muslims they should worry about this Zionist Occupied Government we have suffered from for nearly 80 years. When will we get the boot of racist Jews off our necks and be proud of our race?

Europeans should worry about how to keep the liberal socialists from tearing down more White institutions.

And Australians should worry about how to sit back and not worry about the world’s problems and only worry about if the Outback is going to swallow up the rest of the island?

 

[chrisse]

Ah, an Australian is going to educate me on Islam and how many Muslims populate that island? Please, lady, Australians always pop in with their wit and sass, but have as much to say as a dingo eating a baby. Your country is a just another bastard of the British empire like this ZOG is.

oh, you don’t know much about us Aussies, do you. We love the game of insults. We’re brought up with it. I’d play, however, I’m more interested in the debate. And the moderators won’t tolerate your trolling.

 

[Ryan29]

oh, you don’t know much about us Aussies, do you. We love the game of insults. We’re brought up with it. I’d play, however, I’m more interested in the debate. And the moderators won’t tolerate your trolling.

Oh, I will be banned honey before I wake up tomorrow for proving the Holocaust is a lie.:extrahappy:

Enjoy your dingos and how 90% of your country is unlivable!

 

[pnewton]

Muslim Woman is nothing more than a troll on this forum.

From the forum rules

Terms of derision, derogatory remarks, baiting, and inflammatory statements are prohibited.

The thing is that term doesn’t even apply. A troll is some one that posts just to get a reaction and sits back and watches the show. Since she has over 1800 posts, she is not a troll.

I have been shocked by the general lack of decorum and manners by the Catholics who post have posted on this thread. Perhaps not all who claim to be Catholic really are, but I find it hard to believe that Catholics can not disagree and remain charitable at the same time.

 

[ralphinal]

Oh, I will be banned honey before I wake up tomorrow for proving the Holocaust is a lie.:extrahappy:

Enjoy your dingos and how 90% of your country is unlivable!

I wish you were here, where you could talk to my cousin who was one of the first American troops into Dachau. He would slap your face for saying it is a lie. He held dead Jewish babies, moved mothers who died trying to protect their kids.

No, the Holocaust is not a lie.

And, just so you’ll know, agnostic_in_ist is in TURKEY.

 

[dolphinlove]

Ah, an Australian is going to educate me on Islam and how many Muslims populate that island? Please, lady, Australians always pop in with their wit and sass, but have as much to say as a dingo eating a baby. Your country is a just another bastard of the British empire like this ZOG is.

And your a poor excuse for an American.
I think your head is been in the dessert sands of arizona for too long.
It just shows how much you know of our country, i see your a student in your profile, what do you actually learn? Nothing by the sound of it.

 

[sedonaman]

We can’t judge another culture.

I’ve been interested in this claim for some time and have come to the conclusion that we can and must judge other cultures because we have to choose the one to live in. Even if you live in the one in which you were born, you have judged others by rejecting them as your home.

Then they could judge ours and then we would be left splitting hairs about the Crusades.

I don’t care if they judge ours. As I indicated above, it is necessary.

I think a lot of discussion about the Crusades is long overdue in the West. Westerners, particularly Americans and Catholics/Christians in general have been saddled with a lot of undeserved guilt which Muslims have been quick to exploit. The better informed we are, the less likely we are to succumb to their ridiculous propaganda, particularly about the Crusades. And we don’t need to “split hairs” over them to understand they were a response to 463 years of Muslim aggression. And you don’t make peace by appeasing aggression.

If you think that is an exaggeration, just ponder how Muslim armies got from Medina c. 632 AD to most of southern and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages and the gates of Vienna in AD 1683 … by knocking on doors and handing out brochures on street corners? Gimme a break.

Having said that, let me conclude that I’m not into bashing people individually because it accomplishes nothing. I try to concentrate on the ideology of Islam, or whatever. I do believe that Islam is a threat to the world because it is all about war, conquest, and death. It not only gives a man an excuse to revert to his feral nature, it holds out the promise of heavenly reward for indulging in uncivilized, barbaric practices. It keeps women from having an influence on society because it knows all too well and good that women civilize the man. If that ever happened, it would spell the end of Islam. In short, it’s a Mafia with a “how to” manual.

If that’s splitting hairs or being judgmental, so be it.

 

[R_not]

We can’t judge another culture. Then they could judge ours and then we would be left splitting hairs about the Crusades. It’s not in God’s Path to make judgment calls like that.

Stop comparing the violence against non-muslims do NOW with the Crusades! This guy doesn’t want to discuss the Crusades in a way that is constructive. He is only practicing tu quoque. Geez, they happened centuries ago. The jihads against non-muslims are still happening to this very day.

 

[R_not]

Do you watch a lot of Fox News that tout this Muslim conspiracy jargon? You know that’s just a TV station that sells network space for ratings don’t you?

Are you afraid of Fox news? Why are you afraid of it?

muslims behave poorly and what happens is that they don’t like to be told they behave poorly by our standards because by their standards they are behaving as good, widdle muslims. They riot and spout hatred out of their coy, virginal little mouths and they don’t like it that someone caught them on tape doing such a thing. It makes da’wa hard to do after that.

Or their children get caught beheading someone, or the muslim community gets caught dragging someone through the streets, or dancing and ulalating over one of their children who died while killing non-muslims and they don’t like it that they are shown as behaving poorly. Because by their standards they are doing this all for allah!

tsk tsk tsk So, you don’t like Fox news. Why? Because they didn’t practice censorship and appease muslims and gave Mr. Wilders a 3 minute segment?

What is the basis for your fear?

 

[sedonaman]

So, you don’t like Fox news. Why? Because they didn’t practice censorship and appease muslims and gave Mr. Wilders a 3 minute segment?

“To be in favor of diversity as the modern liberal defines it is to be intolerant of opposing views.” – intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/19/diversity-is-the-last-thing-we-need

What is the basis for your fear?

Political correctness was invented to conceal / deny truth.

 

[R_not]

“To be in favor of diversity as the modern liberal defines it is to be intolerant of opposing views.” – intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/19/diversity-is-the-last-thing-we-need

Political correctness was invented to conceal / deny truth.

Actually, they have a lot in common with muslims who for so long just killed those who opposed them, questioned them, or just wanted to discuss such things as islam, mohammed and allah.

This glared back at me from your article:

They are less able to adapt to a rapidly changing environment because they have no experience coping with new ideas and situations because they have only associated with people who are just like them. They have lost the capability to adapt because they have never had to. They are considered the intellectual equivalent of a herd of stampeding buffalo; they travel together as a herd and dare not stray. They are regarded as souls who are more likely to be dismissive (and seemingly intolerant) of those not like them because they simply cannot see things from any perspective except their own.

I mean the article just goes on and on with things that are oh so very true!!!

Thanks - that article is a keeper.

 

[R_not]

“To be in favor of diversity as the modern liberal defines it is to be intolerant of opposing views.” – intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/19/diversity-is-the-last-thing-we-need

Political correctness was invented to conceal / deny truth.

Check this article out on that same website:
A lament for Britain

If I were living in Britain today I would probably be looking to leave.

In the fourteen years since that winter, Britain has become a place where common law is breaking down, liberty has been surrendered and history is no longer valued. The main reasons for this are the excessive political correctness of Britain’s political and cultural elites, the assertiveness of Britain’s growing Muslim community and the unwillingness of political and cultural elites to stand up for common law, exercise liberty and remember its history.

I have been thinking the same thing that this article has covered. And I look at it as an ally going away. We should not be happy about this. To replace Britain with another muslim country as an ally is just gross. Look at Pakistan and Saudi Arabia - they are allies and supposed friends. I prefer living next to hungry grizzly bears than their ‘friendships’.

It is not only Britain, but also the EU. Geert Wilders is like a lone voice among a bunch of idiots over there. I know there are probably others who are just as bothered by what is happening and don’t have the voice, but they are overrun by their politicians (as we also have some fools in office) who are just caving in to muslims and their demands. It hasn’t worked for any other country they made into a pig sty - it isn’t going to work for them either. And it won’t work for us either. Appeasement doesn’t work unless you wnat to condemn all our children to islam.

 

[Muslim_Woman]

In the name of Allah , Most Gracious, Most Merciful

Salaam/peace

And ???

That was a perfect representation of your post (or rather your indoctrinated mind) as you tried to defend islamic divorce laws.

I’m confused.

You are most welcome to hate me & post any images in your posts replying to me. But u should not add anything in my or someone else’s posts.

I am drawing attention of Forum Admin about this matter. chrisse did it earlier more than once . I requested her not to do it but she is still doing it.

 

[pnewton]

From the forum rules posted at the top here:

Rhetorical questions may be used to introduce a new aspect of inquiry but not to evade challenges or to call into question the intelligence, education, or any other personal qualities of another poster.

 

[R_not]

From the forum rules posted at the top here:

With deception a part of islam - I don’t see that as anything personal to one muslim.

war is deception knowing that our lands are considered dar al harb - the land of war.

War is deception - mohammed
islam is deception

And they even have their own names for it in islam: taqiyya/kithman

Since Islam allows lying to the unbelievers, how do you know they’re speaking sincerely?

The Qur’an:
Sura (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie.

Sura (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to “guard themselves.”

Sura (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must “hide his faith” among those who are not believers.

Sura (2:225) - “Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts”

Sura (66:2) - “Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths” Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be “compelled” to deceive others for a greater purpose.

And here is the clash that is happening. Some of us have more problems than others with this deception in muslims. We teach our kids not to lie, we are taught about there being a commandment in the 10 Commandments not to lie. And we don’t look highly on liars - especially pathological liars. And we even have to make it politcally correct by saying ‘deception’, or ‘deceiving’.

And with it being a command in islam - it doesn’t make for a good mix. Oil and water.

So, how do you trust liars? Oh, er I mean how do you trust ones who are commanded to deceive us? Especially when we know the truth is completely the opposite, or that they do exactly what they are whining about in others?

 

[sedonaman]

I have been thinking the same thing that this article has covered. And I look at it as an ally going away. We should not be happy about this.

Perhaps you have read Bat Ye’or on Eurabia? “…A machinery that has made Europe the new continent of dhimmitude was put into motion more than 30 years ago at the instigation of France. … A wide-ranging policy was then first sketched out, a symbiosis of Europe with the Muslim Arab countries, that would endow Europe – and especially France, the project’s prime mover – with a weight and a prestige to rival that of the United States. This policy was undertaken quite discreetly, outside of official treaties, under the innocent-sounding name of the Euro-Arab Dialogue.” frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14050

And Theodore Dalrymple? “Were it not for the abuse of women, Islam would go the way of the Church of England.”
city-journal.org/html/eon_11_15_04td.html

 

[sedonaman]

So, how do you trust … ones who are commanded to deceive us? Especially when we know the truth is completely the opposite, or that they do exactly what they are whining about in others?

“Since Islam has a dualistic logic and dualistic ethics, it is completely foreign to us. Muslims think differently from us and feel differently from us. So our aversion is based upon fear and a rejection of Islamic ethics and logic. This aversion causes us to avoid learning about Islam so we are ignorant and stay ignorant.

“Another part of the aversion is the realization that there is no compromise with dualistic ethics. There is no halfway place between unitary ethics and dualistic ethics. If you are in a business deal with someone who is a liar and a cheat, there is no way to avoid getting cheated. No matter how nice you are to a con man, he will take advantage of you. … In short, Islamic politics, ethics, and logic cannot be part of our civilization. Islam does not assimilate; it dominates. There is never any ‘getting along’ with Islam. Its demands never cease, and the demands must be met on Islam’s terms: submission.”

Ref: “The Study of Political Islam”
By Bill Warner
frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26769

 

[R_not]

Perhaps you have read Bat Ye’or on Eurabia? “…A machinery that has made Europe the new continent of dhimmitude was put into motion more than 30 years ago at the instigation of France. … A wide-ranging policy was then first sketched out, a symbiosis of Europe with the Muslim Arab countries, that would endow Europe – and especially France, the project’s prime mover – with a weight and a prestige to rival that of the United States. This policy was undertaken quite discreetly, outside of official treaties, under the innocent-sounding name of the Euro-Arab Dialogue.” frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14050

And Theodore Dalrymple? “Were it not for the abuse of women, Islam would go the way of the Church of England.”
city-journal.org/html/eon_11_15_04td.html

Thanks for the articles. I haven’t read them yet, but before I do - I don’t see the over concern for women in Britain anymore. With their allowing the sharia laws in British society anymore - they hand the muslim women back to their abusers now.

I see the deadening of our own left to having any concerns over women too. When people try to bring out the plight of women, especially in Universities, we see the left right along with the muslims, throwing things, shouting out the speakers and behaving badly. Or when they are forced to behave themselves they don’t show up for the talks.

The left used to champion women’s rights and now they have left that behind to thinking it is all about abortion and muslim’s rights (without knowing, or ignoring and/or denying) the plight of muslim women in islam.

It goes back to that first article you showed to us and how the left’s, or liberals, are open to discussion anymore. NOT!

Oh well, thanks. I have to sign off for now and will indeed read the articles you provided.

by the way, I have read ‘While Europe Slept’ and ‘Menace in Europe’. Similar themes.