G
GodsGadfly
Guest
Thanks, Yellow Belle,
Now, that’s something, and that’s different, as it’s a question of priestly discipline.
I’d also wonder what the context of that is, especially since they mention falconry specifically: remember that hunting in the middle ages was risky business in that you could inadvertantly wander onto royal land while hunting, and then be guilty of poaching. That is especially true in the case of hunting with dogs or hawks, and it is very easy to see why the Church in the Middle Ages would have frowned on it.
Yet, as my wife pointed out when I told her of this “issue,” the Apostles themselves were fisherman, so I cannot imagine it being a complete prohibition.
The idea that certain bishops may ban their priests from hunting makes perfect sense. It also makes sense that hunting may be seen as an exercise of physical discipline necessary for suffering, as well as a means of a priest who has vowed poverty obtaining a low-cost food that he could, in turn, share with others.
So, the question becomes: “Is Fr. Corapi violating any rule of his Order or the diocese in which he resides by hunting?”
In any case, that was not the implicatin of the posters who raised this subject: their implication was that hunting is immoral and that, by hunting per se, Fr. Corapi negates his credentials as a speaker on strict moral discipline.
Now, that’s something, and that’s different, as it’s a question of priestly discipline.
I’d also wonder what the context of that is, especially since they mention falconry specifically: remember that hunting in the middle ages was risky business in that you could inadvertantly wander onto royal land while hunting, and then be guilty of poaching. That is especially true in the case of hunting with dogs or hawks, and it is very easy to see why the Church in the Middle Ages would have frowned on it.
Yet, as my wife pointed out when I told her of this “issue,” the Apostles themselves were fisherman, so I cannot imagine it being a complete prohibition.
The idea that certain bishops may ban their priests from hunting makes perfect sense. It also makes sense that hunting may be seen as an exercise of physical discipline necessary for suffering, as well as a means of a priest who has vowed poverty obtaining a low-cost food that he could, in turn, share with others.
So, the question becomes: “Is Fr. Corapi violating any rule of his Order or the diocese in which he resides by hunting?”
In any case, that was not the implicatin of the posters who raised this subject: their implication was that hunting is immoral and that, by hunting per se, Fr. Corapi negates his credentials as a speaker on strict moral discipline.