G
GKC
Guest
I tend to agree. That’s not how I use the term, Creedally. Nor is it how the typical Anglican (assuming you could find one) uses it.That is the history of the term. Using Catholic (or catholic) to mean all of Christianity regardless of contradictory beliefs is a misuse of the word. It’s obvious that there is a motive behind using it that way–to justify the many, many different beliefs within non-Catholic Christianity, but it is still a mistaken use.
It’s not what is meant by “catholic” in the creed, either,which I guess it why Luther deleted it.![]()
For an Anglican, Catholic coincides with apostolic; That is, it refers to those apostolic Churches in communion with the Holy Father (all 23 of them), the Orthodox who are apostolic, who are not in communion, the Anglicans who have retained apostolic succession (not all have, and it’s perfectly legit for you to say none have; we disagree), and the occasional bit and piece, such as the Swedish Lutherans, and such of the Old Catholics who haven’t gone all trendy. It’s sort of like James is saying above.
There’s no reason not to disagree with this Anglican position; indeed, if you didn’t I’d remind you that you should. But you need to know what it is, to do it effectively.
And yes, I’m fairly well read in the issue of Anglican orders.
GKC