Fr. Dwight Longenecker: No Obedience No Heaven

  • Thread starter Thread starter choliks
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In the admonitions to the people of his time St. Francis of Assisi wrote

Of Perfect and Imperfect Obedience

*The Lord says in the Gospel: he ā€œthat doth not renounce all that he possesses cannot beā€ a "disciple " and ā€œhe that will save his life, shall lose it.ā€ That man leaves all he possesses and loses his body and his soul who abandons himself wholly to obedience in the hands of his superior, and whatever he does and says—provided he himself knows that what he does is good and not contrary to his [the superior’s] will—is true obedience. And if at times a subject sees things which would be better or more useful to his soul than those which the superior commands him, let him sacrifice his will to God, let him strive to fulfill the work enjoined by the superior. *This is true and charitable obedience which is pleasing to God and to one’s neighbor.
 
Obedience to only that which we agree with is not obedience at all. It is coincidence. True obedience is only found when we do not want to obey.
 
I’m afraid I don’t understand what the virtue here is…obeying someone’s opinion that is not fact? It is the opinion of some superiors that Harry Potter is sinful and should not be read by anyone, ever…are they really more holy who obey that superior than the ones who say, no, I am in no sin by disobeying this opinion?

I understand the need for obediance to the law of God…but I see nothing to be proud of here. Feels like playing the martyr to look pious

ā€œOh look how hard it is to be obedient but I do it!ā€

No…you’re being obediant un-neededly to a non-binding, fallible opinion. How is that gonna get you to heaven better than the man who decides with prudence and prayer that this is not something requireing sacrifical obediance?
 
You should read, for starters, St. Teresa of Avila and St. Faustina on the subject of obedience. Religious obedience would, indeed, give up reading Harry Potter if the superior said so. To refuse would be a violation of the vow of obedience. Keeping your vows is not ā€œplaying the martyr to look pious.ā€ It is keeping a vow. Don’t you keep the promises you make?
I’m afraid I don’t understand what the virtue here is…obeying someone’s opinion that is not fact? It is the opinion of some superiors that Harry Potter is sinful and should not be read by anyone, ever…are they really more holy who obey that superior than the ones who say, no, I am in no sin by disobeying this opinion?

I understand the need for obediance to the law of God…but I see nothing to be proud of here. Feels like playing the martyr to look pious

ā€œOh look how hard it is to be obedient but I do it!ā€

No…you’re being obediant un-neededly to a non-binding, fallible opinion. How is that gonna get you to heaven better than the man who decides with prudence and prayer that this is not something requireing sacrifical obediance?
 
No Obedience No Heaven
by Fr. Dwight Longenecker

What do you think? šŸ™‚
The obedience required is the obedience of faith. To obey a superior in religion is not necessarily to condone or approve of the person or all his actions. The root of the word ā€œobedienceā€ is oboedire which means ā€˜to listen’. Therefore to obey is to listen–to listen deeply not only to your own thoughts and not only to the circumstances, but also to what God is doing in your life because believe me–he is doing far greater things than you can imagine.
I love this definition of obedience.
Obedience has developed a bad reputation. It is equated with servitude, in it’s most negative sense, in our society. Obedience is radically counter-cultural today, when we have a distorted sense of freedom and knowledge.

The cross is our best example of obedience. God himself, endures the ultimate injustice at the hands of men (anything we endure pales by comparison), but still he ā€œlistens toā€ the calling of his Father to sacrifice for all of us.

From our Catechism:
vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p1s1c3a1.htm
ARTICLE 1
I BELIEVE
I. THE OBEDIENCE OF FAITH
144 To obey (from the Latin ob-audire, to ā€œhear or listen toā€) in faith is **to submit freely **to the word that has been heard, because its truth is guaranteed by God, who is Truth itself. Abraham is the model of such obedience offered us by Sacred Scripture. The Virgin Mary is its most perfect embodiment.
 
Most of us lay Catholics do not face the same difficulties a Padre Pio, Fr. Solanus Casey, Fr. Dwight Longenecker or many religious face(d). But we certainly can relate to the issue of humility and obedience due legitimate ecclesiastical superiors.

As Canon Law states,
Can. 212 §1 Christ’s faithful, conscious of their own responsibility, are bound to show christian obedience to what the sacred Pastors, who represent Christ, declare as teachers of the faith and prescribe as rulers of the Church.
Its apparent many lay Catholics today feel more comfortable speaking up regarding life in their parishes and also how they view or are treated by ecclesiastical authorities.

I highlighted the areas I believe may be the greatest test of humility and a challenge to lay Catholics?
§2 Christ’s faithful are at liberty to make known their needs, especially their spiritual needs, and their wishes to the Pastors of the Church.
§3 They have the right, indeed at times the duty, ** in keeping with their knowledge, competence and position**, to manifest to the sacred Pastors their views on matters which concern the good of the Church. They have the right also to make their views known to others of Christ’s faithful, but in doing so they must always respect the integrity of faith and morals, show due reverence to the Pastors and take into account both the common good and the dignity of individuals.
 
I’m afraid I don’t understand what the virtue here is…obeying someone’s opinion that is not fact? It is the opinion of some superiors that Harry Potter is sinful and should not be read by anyone, ever…are they really more holy who obey that superior than the ones who say, no, I am in no sin by disobeying this opinion?
If the superior commands it, it ought to be obeyed. If it’s the superior’s opinion, you don’t need to go out of your way to satisfy him.

For instance: I’ve had several superiors who go as far as to differentiate. If they want people to obey they just say ā€œI charge you under Holy Obedience toā€¦ā€
 
The beautiful thing about obedience is, it goes forward in trust. Obedience trusts the truth, beauty, and goodness that Jesus Christ is, as expressed through his Church. Obedience does not crush us, ultimately. Although we may suffer in it.
For me, ā€œlistening toā€ the Church can give me hope if I trust that Christ will support and sustain me, even when I are asked to do something that threatens my comfort, or position, or personal preferences.
God will sustain us if we are faithfully obedient.
 
The traditional Catholic understanding of obedience we are discussing in this thread is central to my view of traditionalism. It is one of the traditions that I am accepting when I identify myself as a traditionalist. It is a tragic irony that so many associate traditionalism with disobedience.
 
Why do you folks make this so complicated?

The traditional understanding of obedience was laid out by St Benedict. Obedience to legitimate authority, when that authority commands that which is not contrary to the commandments, regardless of how beneficial or how idiotic, it pleases God that we obey as Christ obeyed in all things but sin.

Stop over analyzing obedience. This is what has gotten so many Catholics (clergy, religious and laity) into trouble. They start asking so many questions that at the end they do the opposite of what they want to do. They want to be more like Christ, but at the end, they are further from Christ. The content of the order is not as pleasing to God as the detachment from self on the part of the person who obeys.

I always find it interesting that every time I post this citation from the admonitions of St. Francis, people on CAF just ride right over this admonition and don’t realize that it’s very traditional, because he’s just restating what St. Benedict had already defined for us as true and perfect obedience around the 6th century. This just blows traditionalism right out the window. We cannot say that we love tradition and ignore the masters of Christian Spirituality.

My community, Franciscan Brothers of Life, is a very traditional community. The first thing that we teach our postulants to both the consecrated life and the secular brothers is to obey because Christ obeyed. * ā€œThen he went down to Nazareth with them and was obedient to them,ā€ *(LK 2:51).

Biblical examples that always come to my mind when I think of obedience are Abraham’s submission to God’s request to sacrifice Isaac, the boy Jesus leaving the temple with his parents and Jesus at the wedding in Cana.

The wedding at Cana is a very powerful lesson in obedience. Those of us who have grown up with Jewish mothers know what they can be like. They do not ask for a favor. They lay down the facts as if they were reporting the weather. ā€œThey have no wine;ā€ and they expect you to do something about it. It’s a given that you know that you have to do something about it. A Jewish mom does not ask, ā€œCan you do them a favor, because they have no wine?ā€ Also in that story we see Mary TELL the waiters, not ask or suggest, ā€œDo whatever he tells you.ā€ The waiters bring the water to Jesus. They obey Mary and Christ not knowing what the outcome would be.

Another great example from Catholic history are Saints Dominic and Francis. The law of the Church was that there were to be no more rules for religious orders. If you wanted to start a new order, you had to take one of the existing rules and adapt it. Francis goes to Pope Innocent III not knowing of such a law. He hands the pope his rule for his brothers. Pope Innocent bypasses the law and approves the new rule. In comes Dominic with his rule for his Brother Preachers. The same pope tells him that the law says ā€œno more rulesā€. Dominic humbly adopts the Rule of St. Augustine for his preachers and fills in the blanks with his statutes, called constitution.

The beauty here is that Dominic does not argue because Francis got approval and he does not. Nor does Dominic feel slighted or resentment. He doesn’t cry ā€œabuse of powerā€. On the contrary, he responds with great love and obedience, so much love that he wrote into the statutes that he added to St. Augustine’s rule that the Dominicans were never to find fault with the Franciscans, were to venerate them, protect them and welcome them as brothers. This still binds them to this day. Francis never reciprocated with the same kind of statute for our family. We dearly love the Dominicans and we refer to St. Dominic as Our Holy Father Dominic, because he and his sons have loved us.

When one obeys out of love, one often stirs up the love in the heart of the neighbor. There is no greater charity that teaching another how to obey out of pure love.
 
Why do you folks make this so complicated?

The traditional understanding of obedience was laid out by St Benedict. Obedience to legitimate authority, when that authority commands that which is not contrary to the commandments, regardless of how beneficial or how idiotic, it pleases God that we obey as Christ obeyed in all things but sin.

Stop over analyzing obedience. This is what has gotten so many Catholics (clergy, religious and laity) into trouble. They start asking so many questions that at the end they do the opposite of what they want to do. They want to be more like Christ, but at the end, they are further from Christ. The content of the order is not as pleasing to God as the detachment from self on the part of the person who obeys.
Sorry to snip you Brother but you are right. It is made way too complicated.

Not my will but thy will be done.

That’s it. It’s really simple. Christ said it in the garden and that’s our example.

Can anyone imagine a marriage where husband and wife live this out in reality? I would love to go to a business meeting where everyone had this attitude. Imagine what we would be able to accomplish if everyone in the Church had this attitude.

-Tim-
 
Sorry to snip you Brother but you are right. It is made way too complicated.

Not my will but thy will be done.

That’s it. It’s really simple. Christ said it in the garden and that’s our example.

… **Imagine what we would be able to accomplish if everyone in the Church had this attitude. **

-Tim-
Satan knows that. :o
 
I just read the article. Fr. Longenecker makes a good point at the end.

***The root of the word ā€œobedienceā€ is oboedire which means ā€˜to listen’. ***

The first words in St. Benedict’s rule are

Listen. Listen my son, with the ears of your heart.

This is something I struggle with. If I want to be obedient as Christ was obedient, I have to start by shutting up and listening. That doesn’t mean just hearing the words spoken but listening to what is being said.

-Tim-
 
Tim, as all of you know, I’m a revert to the religious life. I left at time when the religious life was in transition. Rather than submit to the will of God and walk through the dark night, I asked to be released of my vows.

However, God’s plans for us cannot be handcuffed. It was his plan that I go through a dark night, because it is necessary for my soul. After leaving, I met a young woman, married, had children. There was an accident. I lost my wife, father and one of my sons. I had one of two choices. I could curse the darkness at that moment or I could choose to obey God’s invitation to walk into the night not seeing the hand that guided me, but trusting that He was guiding me toward light.

The end result was that I raised two wonderful Catholic adults. One serves children and adolescent with disabilities. She was trained as a journalist. After receiving her MA in journalism, she was hired by a major news company and resigned in 24 hours. She came home and said, ā€œI don’t belong there.ā€ She went back to school for a second Master’s degree in brain development and developmental disabilities. Today, she’s a therapist for adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Everyday she is punched, scratched, hit and spat upon. Every night she goes home to her husband filled with confidence that this is where God wants her to be. Her husband and she have prayed over this and have concluded that this is where she will find Christ and that his role is to be like Joseph was to Mary. He is there to support and protect her.

My son, who is an autistic savant, went on to college. He found that he could not keep up. He came home and said, ā€œDad, is it ok if I live at home for a while?ā€ While at home he trained in auto mechanics, but continued to work in art. He is a full-time auto mechanic and in the evenings and weekends, he illustrates books. He has gone back to school and completed his degree in fine art. When he turned 21, I gave him everything I owned, because I was going to return to the religious life.

He took the assets that I gave him and the first thing that he did was to purchase a home in the poorest part of town and he gave me the keys saying, ā€œDad, I know that you can’t own anything. But I know that you belong with the poor. Live here with your brothers. When you no longer need the house, just give it back to me. It’s only a loaner.ā€ I asked him why he was doing this. He had enough money to buy a nice home in a nice community. His answer was typical autistic, which is usually very concrete. ā€œI’m not interested in the middle class BS. I just want to do something good for others. What is wrong with doing something good for other people? I thought that’s what Jesus wanted us to do?ā€

I returned to religious life, but was soon told to leave my larger community and start a new society of Franciscans who would live the Gospel according to the Franciscan tradition of the 13th century, but with one slight twist. Our life is the same as the first generation of brothers and sisters who followed Francis. Our apostolic work is to proclaim the Gospel of Life as St. Maximilian Kolbe did at Auschwitz, to be totally immersed in the Gospel so that when Christ calls us to give all for the life of a father and his family, we can obey without hesitation.

This time, I did not resist and did not ask the pope to let me off the hook. I have tried to obey. Each day, obedience becomes more difficult. There is no resting place on this side of heaven.

It is difficult to pray when one feels misunderstood. It is difficult to love when others refuse to listen. It is difficult to be kind when others are unkind. It is difficult to lead ones brothers, when God takes away your health little by little one day at a time, but expects you to lead and govern them. It is difficult to believe in the Church when Catholics denounce her as being in chaos and half empty. But obedience has taught me that no matter what, it is always necessary to do what God places before me at the present moment, no matter how simple, ridiculous or foolish it may seem.

I too struggle with obedience. But I’m not sure if my struggle with obedience is as great as the struggle of the Immaculate for my soul. The only advice I can give to anyone is to ask her what I ask her every day.

ā€œMother, please ask your Son to remember me, because sometimes I forget Him.ā€
 
If the superior commands it, it ought to be obeyed. If it’s the superior’s opinion, you don’t need to go out of your way to satisfy him.

For instance: I’ve had several superiors who go as far as to differentiate. If they want people to obey they just say ā€œI charge you under Holy Obedience toā€¦ā€
But that makes no sense. Are we just talking about religious brothers/sisters/priests, or do you mean laypeople? I sure as heck am not going to obey a priest if he tells me, You must stop wearing sleeveless blouses/ eating meat on non-Lenten Fridays/you must cover your hair for church.

Just because someone COMMANDS something, doesnt mean it’s still not their OPINION!
 
But that makes no sense. Are we just talking about religious brothers/sisters/priests, or do you mean laypeople? I sure as heck am not going to obey a priest if he tells me, You must stop wearing sleeveless blouses/ eating meat on non-Lenten Fridays/you must cover your hair for church.

Just because someone COMMANDS something, doesnt mean it’s still not their OPINION!
Legitimate authority has a right to command based on its opinion. The question is not whether it is the personal opinion of the priest or not. To God this point is irrelevant. God’s logic is not as flawed as human logic. God’s logic is about perfect virtue.

If the priest in question is my spiritual director, then it seems that I voluntarily placed myself in his hands to guide me along the journey. By doing so, I gave him the authority to command me. In giving him the authority to command me, I implicitly agreed to obey.

On the other hand, if the priest in question is speaking to me outside of a formal relationship such as spiritual director and directee or confessor and penitent, then he’s not exercising authority over me. I’m free to politely bypass what he suggests.

Don’t look at whether this is his personal opinion or not. To God, this question is irrelevant. Is this relationship between you and this priest a formal relationship where he is in authority? If so, then you must obey. If not, then you thank him for his suggestion and you do as you think best.

As I keep saying, don’t make this so complicated.

Pope Leo XIII once casually commented to an American cardinal that he doubted there were too many Americans in heaven. The cardinal was shocked and asked why. The pope responded that Americans were very fond of their opinions and their freedom to the exclusion of God’s opinion and God’s rights.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top