Fr. Eduard Schillebeeckx passed away

  • Thread starter Thread starter didymus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

didymus

Guest
Flanders News:
Schillebeeckx dies
Schillebeeckx, who was seen as a reformer, often sparred with the Vatican.
Originally from Antwerp, he entered the Dominican Order in 1934 studying theology at several European universities. In the early fifties he started to write lengthy popularising tomes about man’s search for God and the Church.

In 1962 the progressive Dutch cardinal Alfrink chose Schillebeeckx as his assistant for the Second Vatican Council.
The Fleming set to work to help modernise the Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands.

His most important works appeared in the seventies. They did not receive a warm welcome in Rome and on several occasions he was castigated for his views on the role of women and lay people in the Church as well as for his pronouncement that God was greater that all religions put together.
The Flemish theologian lectured until 1983 receiving the Erasmus Prize in 1982.

May he rest in peace.

Btw, this is the only English-language article about his death I could find. The rest were in Dutch, French and one in Portuguese.
 
Reading his biography I think that he hasn´t made the church greater but modernising, protestantisting and all other things, they have made a lot of harmness to Christ and the church.
 
Rest in peace, Fr. Schillebeeckx. Catholicism has lost one of its greatest minds and articulate spokesmen. May God reward you for your long lifetime of service to God and humanity
 
Rest in peace, Fr. Schillebeeckx. Catholicism has lost one of its greatest minds and articulate spokesmen. May God reward you for your long lifetime of service to God and humanity
Sparring with the Vatican is not exactly praiseworthy.

May God have mercy on his soul.
 
Rest in peace, Fr. Schillebeeckx. Catholicism has lost one of its greatest minds and articulate spokesmen.
I’m not too sure of what he was the spokesman for, but it certainly wasn’t Catholicism.
 
He was instrumental in turning Dutch churches from the houses of worship they were in the past to the glorified museums they are today.
 
Let us pray that the mercy for which we all hope will be shown to Fr. Schillebeeckx.
 
I don’t think anyone needs to pray for God’s mercy for Fr. Schillebeeckx. He has more than earned it. Rather, we should pray in thanksgiving to God for giving us a man of such foresight and wisdom.

He was spot on regarding much of what He said. He saw the need to remove the shackles of false traditionalism and the blinders of bureaucratic thinking and was not afraid to proclaim the truth. A few hundred years earlier he would have been beheaded. Now we just do it with words and condemnations disguised as faint praise.
 
I don’t think anyone needs to pray for God’s mercy for Fr. Schillebeeckx.
Ridiculous and uncatholic.
He has more than earned it.
:eek:
Rather, we should pray in thanksgiving to God for giving us a man of such foresight and wisdom.
When one turns God’s gifts into potential millstones…Then we should pray for the repose of a soul.
He was spot on regarding much of what He said. He saw the need to remove the shackles of false traditionalism and the blinders of bureaucratic thinking and was not afraid to proclaim the truth. A few hundred years earlier he would have been beheaded. Now we just do it with words and condemnations disguised as faint praise.
Beheaded? Oh yeah, like Martin Luther and Galileo…!

:gopray2: for Fr. Schillebeeckx
 
I, and probably many reading this thread who have not been following developments in the Dutch Church, have absolutely no idea whatsoever who Fr. Schillebeeckx was, what he did, or what he stood for, and have never even heard or read his name until seeing it here. The article itself doesn’t shed much more light.

Could someone please give a little background on the man, and why he was, apparently, so controversial?
 
This board never seems to miss a chance to take cheap shots at deceased people they don’t like.
 
Sparring with the Vatican is not exactly praiseworthy.

May God have mercy on his soul.
Sometimes the Vatican NEEDS someone to spar with them a little. It might keep certain people from taking themselves–as opposed to their sacred offices–too seriously.

All of us need God’s mercy
 
To those who are unfamiliar with Schillebeeckx, here is an excerpt from the bio cited below. You can click on the link to read the whole article. I underlined some parts that may have contributed to tensions with the Vatican.

Encyclopedia of World Biography on Edward Schillebeeckx

www.bookrags.com/biography/edward-schillebeeckx/

From 1943 Schillebeeckx was teaching theology at the Catholic University of Louvain. He was responsible for the entire curriculum of dogmatic theology (that which exposes the basic tenets of church doctrine), which was spread over a four-year cycle. Thus he was forced to consider the entire corpus of Catholic doctrine and think about the interrelations among the different tracts. His first publications, beginning in the early 1950s, dealt with sacramental theology. Translated into English as Christ, The Sacrament of Encounter with God (1962), his first book received a warm reception. Schillebeeckx was rethinking the sacraments in non-scholastic, personalist categories, searching for the presence of Christ in and through the signs of the sacramental ceremonies. His next book, on Mary, treated her in the context of Christology, rather than in the ecclesiastic context usually employed. The result was to humanize Mary, tying her to the humanity and work of Jesus. This focus, more limited than the previous tendency to associate Mary with the entire sweep of the history of salvation, was more congenial to Protestant theologians, who feared idolatrous overtones in Catholic devotion to Mary.

In addition to teaching dogmatic theology at Louvain, Schillebeeckx also gave spiritual direction to numerous students. His tendency in that work was to relax the previously rigid rules and support a training regime both permissive and progressive. This succeeded in reducing tensions between students and faculty, and it put into practice the positive, hopeful, humanistic theology that he was developing from his studies in the history of theology and the Bible. His goal was to be not so much a superior as a friendly, understanding, kindly older brother.

In 1957 Schillebeeckx was appointed to Nimegen University in Holland, where he wrote his most influential books. At first he was depressed by the conditions at Nimegen, which were considerably more constrictive than those at Louvain. But his work as a peritus (expert) before and during the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) put him in contact with the leading bishops and theologians of the world-wide church and caught him up in the euphoria of an unprecedented effort to update the Church by bringing it into dialogue with the modern world. He gave numerous lectures to bishops, explaining recent advances in theology, and he contributed to the chapter on marriage and the family in the key conciliar document Gaudium et Spes (The Church in the Modern World). Reflecting years later, he found the achievement of the council to be ambiguous, because it brought some progress but by no means the radical reforms for which he had hoped. Popes Paul VI and John Paul II both put brakes on such reforms and clamped down on theologians who stressed freedom of conscience or democratic processes in the Church. Schillebeeckx found himself most sympathetic to the “critical communities” that arose in Europe after the council. These grass-roots churches sought to criticize church practice in view of its social and experiential impact, as well as its fidelity to tradition.

Schillebeeckx’s greatest books, on Christology, appeared in Dutch in 1974 and 1977. Translated as Jesus (1979) and Christ (1980), they have set the standard for contemporary studies of Jesus. With great erudition, Schillebeeckx sought to retrieve the experience of both the man Jesus and the early Christian community that became convinced he was alive in their midst (through the resurrection). Together, these books were a tour de force, joining biblical scholarship with hermeneutical (interpretational) acumen and speculative power in a fresh synthesis. The two books brought Schillebeeckx under a cloud in Rome, because they do not use traditional language and do not make the formulas of the Council of Chalcedon (451), where the divinity and humanity of Jesus were defined classically, the template for all Christological reflection.
Schillebeeckx bore the attacks on his writings patiently, continuing to produce controversial studies in other areas. For example, his book on ministry (1980) argued for the ordination of women and against priestly celibacy. He also continued his leadership in Concilium, an international publishing venture designed to help theologians from all over the globe collaborate on important current issues.
 
Thanks, chauncygardner - Looks like he was quite a liberal theologian, then, almost a Dutch version of Fr. Richard McBrien. Thank God Vatican II didn’t go as far as he wanted it to.

Whatever one thought of him, prayers for his soul are certainly in order in any event. Perhaps, before his passing, the experience of the Anglican Communion showed him the effect the “reforms” he sought can have on a church.
 
This board never seems to miss a chance to take cheap shots at deceased people they don’t like.
I don’t know if your comment is in reference to what I said, or somebody else, but regardless, I don’t really see any “cheap shots” anywhere. Plus, as Catholics it’s a good thing to pray for the dead, even those who we might consider the most saintly. I’m sure there’s not a saint out there who said or thought ‘no need to pray for my soul’.
 
The result was to humanize Mary, tying her to the humanity and work of Jesus. This focus, more limited than the previous tendency to associate Mary with the entire sweep of the history of salvation, was more congenial to Protestant theologians, who feared idolatrous overtones in Catholic devotion to Mary.

Actually, this is the approach of the theology of both the Eastern Orthodox as well as Eastern Rite Churches that pledge allegiance to Rome. The latter also permit married priests. Can anyone tell me provide a logical reason why Rome put him in the doghouse?
 
The result was to humanize Mary, tying her to the humanity and work of Jesus. This focus, more limited than the previous tendency to associate Mary with the entire sweep of the history of salvation, was more congenial to Protestant theologians, who feared idolatrous overtones in Catholic devotion to Mary.

Actually, this is the approach of the theology of both the Eastern Orthodox as well as Eastern Rite Churches that pledge allegiance to Rome. The latter also permit married priests. Can anyone tell me provide a logical reason why Rome put him in the doghouse?
Reading the bio, if that was the only thing, I don’t think there would have been too much of a problem. It seems to have been his positions and theological approaches as a whole.
 
The result was to humanize Mary, tying her to the humanity and work of Jesus. This focus, more limited than the previous tendency to associate Mary with the entire sweep of the history of salvation, was more congenial to Protestant theologians, who feared idolatrous overtones in Catholic devotion to Mary.

Actually, this is the approach of the theology of both the Eastern Orthodox as well as Eastern Rite Churches that pledge allegiance to Rome. The latter also permit married priests. Can anyone tell me provide a logical reason why Rome put him in the doghouse?
I have no idea what the quote is talking about. The Catholic Church teaches that Mary is human…did he question the virgin birth? Did he question her immaculate conception? What is it referring to?

Regardless, what does the quote have to do with married priests? The Catholic Church has married priests (albeit by dispensation)…it is a discipline, not dogma. That is different than the de fide teachings about Our Mother.

Oh…and may God have mercy on Fr. Schillebeeckx’ soul.

Holy Mary, Mother of God; pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death. Amen
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top