Fr Gruner status

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjcsfo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
regarding fthr. Gruner, since he is suspended a divinis, can he actually be called a priest? is he supposed to be a practicing priest? i have alot of reservations regarding fthr Gruner, and wonder if he is even allowed to be a practicing priest?
 
I for one would celebrate.

However, I do not think it will happen with Benedict the 16th and this is why.

When Bishop Bruskewitz of Lincoln excommunicated the SSPX in his diocese as being a threat to the Catholic Faith, one of his main supporters was the then Cardinal Ratzinger. I suppose that is why SSPX has not asked for review of their case as call to action has. (for those who wish to know, the case was upheld, call to action’s members are still excommunicated in the diocese of Lincoln.)

I believe that currently SSPX is a threat to the Catholic faith because in effect, they have set themselves up as pope, rejecting some of the things the pope has said (most notably, do not ordain those bishops). This is not the Pope commanding that they steal something, or destroy something, but something that the Pope has complete legitimate authority to ask, and even complete authority to rule whether the case was an emergency or not, the Pope has ruled, and the SSPX have rejected that ruling.

You can never reform the Church by seperating from it.

A lone Raven

p.s. the above comments are solely mine and I take full responsibility for them, anyone who wishes to attack them has every right to PM me and I will do my best to respond
 
I for one would celebrate.

However, I do not think it will happen with Benedict the 16th and this is why.

When Bishop Bruskewitz of Lincoln excommunicated the SSPX in his diocese as being a threat to the Catholic Faith, one of his main supporters was the then Cardinal Ratzinger. I suppose that is why SSPX has not asked for review of their case as call to action has. (for those who wish to know, the case was upheld, call to action’s members are still excommunicated in the diocese of Lincoln.)

I believe that currently SSPX is a threat to the Catholic faith because in effect, they have set themselves up as pope, rejecting some of the things the pope has said (most notably, do not ordain those bishops). This is not the Pope commanding that they steal something, or destroy something, but something that the Pope has complete legitimate authority to ask, and even complete authority to rule whether the case was an emergency or not, the Pope has ruled, and the SSPX have rejected that ruling.

You can never reform the Church by seperating from it.

A lone Raven

p.s. the above comments are solely mine and I take full responsibility for them, anyone who wishes to attack them has every right to PM me and I will do my best to respond
when archbishop lefebvre did the orinations, he specifically stated in his speech that he was not the pope, and he felt that it was necessary to ordain the 4 priests. he never once declared he was pope, and no one in the society ever declared they have set themselves up as pope, nor have they even tried to. do you have enequivocal proof to support this statement? i’d like to see it if you do.

to assume the society has set itself up as pope is wrong, and is misleading. the society states at sspx.org
The Society of Saint Pius X professes filial devotion and loyalty to Pope Benedict XVI, the Successor of Saint Peter and the Vicar of Christ.

The priests of the SSPX pray for the intentions of the Holy Father and the welfare of the local Ordinary at every Mass they celebrate.

this above statement is true and also disproves your claim.
 
when archbishop lefebvre did the orinations, he specifically stated in his speech that he was not the pope, and he felt that it was necessary to ordain the 4 priests. he never once declared he was pope, and no one in the society ever declared they have set themselves up as pope, nor have they even tried to. do you have enequivocal proof to support this statement? i’d like to see it if you do.

to assume the society has set itself up as pope is wrong, and is misleading. the society states at sspx.org
The Society of Saint Pius X professes filial devotion and loyalty to Pope Benedict XVI, the Successor of Saint Peter and the Vicar of Christ.

The priests of the SSPX pray for the intentions of the Holy Father and the welfare of the local Ordinary at every Mass they celebrate.

this above statement is true and also disproves your claim.
First I would like to point out I meant acting as their own Pope as I mean when I say protestants act as their own Pope, not meaning they claim to be pope, or claim the papacy, but rather, they set themselves up as their own authority.

However, even if Lefebvre did not set himself up as Pope he acted as one, for the Pope had told him not to ordain those four bishops and by his own authority he did anyway. He claimed that there was basically a state of emergency correct? The Pope stated there was no emergency and that it was a schismatic act. Lefebvre did not submit to the Pope’s authority and continued to claim it was a state of emergency.

In addition, SSPX may profess devotion to Pope Benedict, but they are not obediant to him, else they would not be held in schism. And truly, the Church holds that they are in schism, or else the excommunication would have been overturned.

A lone Raven

p.s.- Perhaps if you hold they are not in schism you would like to start building a case to overturn the excommunication performed by the Bishop of Lincoln, Fabian W. Bruskewitz. PErhaps that would settle the matter.
 
iam not sure i could start a thing to get the excommunications overturned. i think that is up to the society and not the individual correct? i could be wrong. i will ask my priest if i can do something.

as for what archbishop lefebvre did, not everyone in the SSPX
agrees with his actions, to go against papal authority. JP2 was the Supreme Pontiff, and agreed, i think that the archbishop should have listened to him, and he didn’t. that is history.

schism could be argued against, but iam not here to argue about schism. only stating that they have not set themselves up as pope. i firmly believe that the SSPX does listen to Benedict, certainly they have had alot of meetings with him.

i’d like to see the SSPX in communion with Rome, and have this issue settled once and for all.
 
i’d like to see the SSPX in communion with Rome, and have this issue settled once and for all.
I would as well.
As I stated, you cannot reform the Church from outside it, and there are some abuses and some reforms definately necessary.

A lone Raven
 
EWTN is not God. It is perfectly acceptable to disagree with EWTN’s openly (at times) charismatic tone or even to attack if for straying from Traditional Catholicism. As someone else said, if Mother Angelica was running things still, there would not be any charismatic programming on there. Also it is perfectly acceptable to question whether the third secert was released or if Russia was not consecreted yet. These things are not magisterial, we are not even bound to beleive in Our Lady of Fatima. (With that note, I do indeed beleive in Our Lady of Fatima 😃 )
I love this post, Formosus. EWTN and Mother Angelica played a large part in my conversion. As I recall, she herself had ties to the charismatic movement, but did not like the direction it was heading. It is hard for me not to see EWTN as a bastion of Catholic orthodoxy, but maybe I’m glad my cable provider does not carry it now. If EWTN has changed, I am glad I have not witnessed the changes! As you say, “EWTN is not God,” and we are not bound in any way to believe in the prophesies of Fatima–although I do!🙂
 
You can never reform the Church by seperating from it.
I agree. I think the traditionalists have many valid points about the problems in the church today. I don’t know whether they are the direct result of Vatican II and the NO, as they claim, or if they were hijacked by those with their own agenda). However, when I read their literature I sometimes notice a rather strident tone, a “we’re right, everyone else is wrong” mentality. To paraphrase St Paul, “If I have orthodoxy but I have not love, I have nothing.”
I think many traditionalists are in danger of going the way of Savonarola and Luther, men who saw the church crying out for reform, but instead of “speaking the truth in love” and healing the Church through prayer, fasting and humility, were so full of themselves they cut themselves off from the barque of Peter…
I think we all need to follow the example of St Catharine of Siena.
 
I would as well.
As I stated, you cannot reform the Church from outside it, and there are some abuses and some reforms definately necessary.

A lone Raven
Oh yeah? Tell that to the Free Mason Archbishop Bugnini, banished in shame to Tehran & the Protestants who helped “fabricate” the new mess. They certainly “reformed” (more like almost destroying) the Latin Rite Catholic Mass and they were clearly far from the faith. So much scorn for the SSPX on these forums, but if the Pope does an Assisi, prays towards Mecca, or has some other kind of inter-religious service, there is high 5s all over the place as if your NFL team won their playoff game this year. May God Bless the Society of St. Pius and all those within the Catholic who work to “restore all things in Christ.”
 
Oh yeah? Tell that to the Free Mason Archbishop Bugnini, banished in shame to Tehran & the Protestants who helped “fabricate” the new mess. They certainly “reformed” (more like almost destroying) the Latin Rite Catholic Mass and they were clearly far from the faith. So much scorn for the SSPX on these forums, but if the Pope does an Assisi, prays towards Mecca, or has some other kind of inter-religious service, there is high 5s all over the place as if your NFL team won their playoff game this year. May God Bless the Society of St. Pius and all those within the Catholic who work to “restore all things in Christ.”
I pray for unity and I pray that all things are restored in Christ,

However, I would ask you to look into the Vatican 2 Church and try to understand certain things. For example, the Pope praying toward Mecca has nothing to do with praying toward Allah. As far as I know there were no high fives either. In addition, I do not believe that protestants fabricated the mess we are in. And I am fairly sure that the claims of freemasonry are unfounded.

I see hatred, but it is not toward SSPX. What I said I will stand by “you cannot reform the Church from outside it”

A lone Raven
 
Oh yeah? Tell that to the Free Mason Archbishop Bugnini, banished in shame to Tehran & the Protestants who helped “fabricate” the new mess. They certainly “reformed” (more like almost destroying) the Latin Rite Catholic Mass and they were clearly far from the faith.
This statement is uncharitable. There has never been any proof of Archbishop Bugnini being a freemason, or the reason why he was sent to Iran.
 
This statement is uncharitable. There has never been any proof of Archbishop Bugnini being a freemason, or the reason why he was sent to Iran.
First off, yes there is no proof, and secondly, whenever bishops get sent to far-off countries with very few Catholics as papal nuncios, it is usually seen as a form of punishment. Last I checked, I don’t think there were many Catholics in Iran. Think of Archbishop Michael Fitzgerald, who was recently sent off to Egypt by the pope…

Here’s a video of Fr. Gruner on youtube. He seems to be a bit of a nut.

youtube.com/watch?v=Jyc9RLRGk0s
 
Oh yeah? Tell that to the Free Mason Archbishop Bugnini, banished in shame to Tehran & the Protestants who helped “fabricate” the new mess. They certainly “reformed” (more like almost destroying) the Latin Rite Catholic Mass and they were clearly far from the faith. So much scorn for the SSPX on these forums, but if the Pope does an Assisi, prays towards Mecca, or has some other kind of inter-religious service, there is high 5s all over the place as if your NFL team won their playoff game this year. May God Bless the Society of St. Pius and all those within the Catholic who work to “restore all things in Christ.”
Once again, the same old unsubstantiated stories. Do your homework instead of just repeating the same stuff.

Can anyone really say that the Pope has become a Muslim? He prayed towards Mecca as a gesture to Muslims. It’s not as if the direction of prayer makes a difference for us, so why the big deal? Or is it that he ought not to be conciliatory- just sit in the Vatican and write the Motu Proprio you’re dying for?
maber43;1817268:
Nope. The far north. As in Canada.
Darn. Too far for me- quite a few thousand miles! But I’ll be there in ‘spiritual communio’ with you all!
 
Once again, the same old unsubstantiated stories. Do your homework instead of just repeating the same stuff.

Can anyone really say that the Pope has become a Muslim? He prayed towards Mecca as a gesture to Muslims. It’s not as if the direction of prayer makes a difference for us, so why the big deal? Or is it that he ought not to be conciliatory- just sit in the Vatican and write the Motu Proprio you’re dying for?
paramedicgirl;1817276:
Darn. Too far for me- quite a few thousand miles! But I’ll be there in ‘spiritual communio’ with you all!
I’m sure the Pope was praying for the conversion of the Muslims. And to Jesus. Not some other deity.

And yes, that Motu Proprio would sure be nice.

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c156/paramedicgirl/MotoProprui.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top