Yes, everything you say here works…if the end justifies the means, but it doesn’t. Even though Fr. Gruner was right about no abrogation, it doesn’t justify saying Mass when he’s suspended. Period.
He has been incardinated for seven years now.
The real heros are not Fr. Gruner. The real heroes are the men who remained faithful. The men who patiently went through the proper channels to preserve tradition AND follow the laws of the church.
The real heroes are the hundreds of diocesan and religious priests who requested a celebret for the 1962 missal and received it.
It may seem that way to you, but without Archbishop Lefebvre, there would be no Traditional Mass. It would be gone. There is a quote from a Cardinal (that I wasn’t able to find) that says the same thing.
I understand your comment, but I personally do not think it is that simple. I think every traditional group has their part to play in Divine Providence. Time will tell. I am thankful to God for all of them, and know they are all doing great work.
The real heroes are the men of the FSSP, the Institute of Christ the King, the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius.
Without Archbishop Lefebvre none of those groups would exist. You may not think that, and you are free to have that opinion, but I think Archbishop Lefebvre was the instrunment God used in this time of Crisis. Remember St. Athanasius… he too was an “excommunicated” “schismatic”. He didn’t stop saying Mass when he was kicked out of his dioces, nor when he was “excommunicated”. He kept on going, and was proven to be right.
St. Athanaius was not the only hero in those days. St. Basil, St. Hilary, and St. Gregory were also heros of that crisis and they remained within the normal structures. They all played a part in divine Providence, and I think the same is true today with the SSPX and those within the normal structures.
And in answer to your question on Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict: the answer is they NEVER claimed the old Mass was abrogated, so they neither were mistaken, evil or cowards.
They went along with those who did make the claim and confirmed it by their actions. John Paul II went so far as to issue two Indults for the Old Mass. An Indult is permission to do what they law does not allow. Therefore, by issuing that Indult, he said through his actions that the Old Mass had been abrogated and needed special permission to be celebrated, which was not true.
I answered your question…how about you answer mine:
“So, if we suppose that Fr. Gruner is correct then Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI, and all the members of the Apostolic Signatura, are all either 1. Mistaken, 2. Evil, or 3. Cowards.”
It is probably a mixture of the three, depending on who we are talking about… but I would ad a fourth category. I would add the category of those who went along with it as an act of ,what they believed, to be prudence given the circumstances.
There are also probably many of them who think that the rest of the third secret was made up by Sister Lucy, and thus not part of the “authentic” third secret. That is the conclusion of the famous Italian journalist who wrote the book that has got Italy talking…
and Cardinal Bertone scrambling.