Fr. Raymond Gravel is suing Life Site News

  • Thread starter Thread starter trinitybeliever
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It looks to me like life site news is using a rather frivolous lawsuit as a fund-raising vehicle. I seriously doubt a lawsuit based on being called pro-abortion when you consider yourself to be pro-choice is going to have much traction
Hmmm…well this IS Canada keep in mind. Real Catholic TV is suggesting that the Bishops who allowed this guy to continue in his ministry, preaching pro homosexuality and pro choice values might kick in to help pay legal expenses if it goes that far. I would happen to agree with that. The Bishops allowing heresy run rampant need to put the clamps on. They are far overdue in getting a backbone.
 
With regard to this case, Canadian institutions are increasingly baring all conversation on abortion, especially in places like Quebec. For once, LSN actually achieved results in getting a dissident priest kicked out of office for publicly preaching his views. Perhaps I am attributing too much weight to the articles, and perhaps the bishop in Montreal would have acted on his own, but I doubt it. LSN, although often sensationalistic, with article headlines that can be missleading, usually you can read the actual article and make up your own mind on the issues. Plus, you also have to bear in mind that they are competing against an increasingly anti-catholic media. The Globe and Mail, and the Toronto Star come to mind here. The Globe will publish anything that tars the Catholic Church in a bad light. It doesn’t matter how stupid or unfounded the charges are. Then you have to look at the tone of these articles. Even for the ones that are somewhat even handed, all you have to do is follow the trail of adjectives (…extreem views on abortion…radical religious right…etc…etc…). The Globe, along with the NY Times, has a thirst for Church scandals, and want nothing more than to link the papacy with every single priest who has a fall.

I think if LSN were to shut its doors, I think it would create a large void in the pro-life world. It is definitly not perfect, and I would agree with some that poo-poo their sensationalistic headlines, but they are getting results…

God bless,
Ut
 
To keep this thread fair, once again I would ask for links to specific examples. It’s too easy to take shots at a group in general terms or to refer to in this case “an article they ran”. 🙂
I’m not saying anyone on CAF would do it, however, pro-life groups have many enemies who would use libel against them when they get the chance.
 
I think if LSN were to shut its doors, I think it would create a large void in the pro-life world. It is definitly not perfect, and I would agree with some that poo-poo their sensationalistic headlines, but they are getting results…

God bless,
Ut
Interesting point… If LSN is as effective as Fr. Gravel believes them to be (as indicated by his $500,00 lawsuit) then aren’t they obviously making a tremendous impact on the pro-life debate?
:hmmm:
 
Interesting point… If LSN is as effective as Fr. Gravel believes them to be (as indicated by his $500,00 lawsuit) then aren’t they obviously making a tremendous impact on the pro-life debate?
:hmmm:
THe other point to make is that News is entertainment these days (and perhaps always has been). Sensationalistic headlines captures the reader’s attention. If the headline doesn’t interest them, they wont read the article. Period. In our age of limited attention span, you have to fight the million and one other news sources on the internet to actually get readership. And there is no such thing as an unbiased news source. Its a myth. That said, there is a big difference between being biased, and falsifying facts. I don’t think LSN is guilty of that…at least not intentionally.

God bless,
Ut
 
Interesting point… If LSN is as effective as Fr. Gravel believes them to be (as indicated by his $500,00 lawsuit) then aren’t they obviously making a tremendous impact on the pro-life debate?
:hmmm:
Gravel thinks that Lifesite news was repsonsible for not being able to be an MP. It is laughable that he thinks that Lifesite News can influence Vatican officials. If Lifesite News had any influence on Vatican officials, he would be excommunicated along with every Pro-Choice “Catholic” politician in North America. Last time I checked, Pelosi is still receiving communion.
 
Gravel thinks that Lifesite news was repsonsible for not being able to be an MP. It is laughable that he thinks that Lifesite News can influence Vatican officials. If Lifesite News had any influence on Vatican officials, he would be excommunicated along with every Pro-Choice “Catholic” politician in North America. Last time I checked, Pelosi is still receiving communion.
Hmmm. Good point. If our own church is so lax on the issue, maybe that is all the more reason to support lay groups like LSN who tell it like it is (with added flavour).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top