Fr. Richard John Neuhaus

  • Thread starter Thread starter benedictgal
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a correction. It was not 10AM CST, but 10AM EST. I got the time zones confused as I am in Texas and he died about 9AM, Texas time. I also suppose that the time-frame was a little different because when I called at about 8AM Texas time, the staff at First Things told me that he was still hanging on and that his sisters were with him.

I do not know Fr. Neuhaus, but, I had sent him some emails, especially during the time when folks were criticizing his comments regarding the music at the DC Papal Mass.

Here is what First Things said on their website this morning:

I am going to treasure the little letter he sent me.
I heard “Jody” Bottum on Catholic radio this morning and he pledged to carry on. Evidentally he and Fr. Neuhaus were close. I have a great deal of respect for Mr. Bottums. He is not the powerhouse that Fr. Neuhaus was, but I think we will be hearing more of him.
 
May the angels lead him into paradise, and the martyrs greet him at his coming…

May his soul rest in peace. Amen:gopray2:
 
But an administrator is not the same as a bishop. And when you are administering your own handpicked staff it is a little different than overseeing a diocese with its myriad of people problems. Could he have effectively handled that? Which is one of the reasons I ask, “For what diocese?” as, surely, it would have to be a practical match for his unique talents. Avery Dulles was also a brilliant man. To the point that the pope made him a cardinal But never a bishop was he. There’s something in that to be reflected upon. Bishop is a particular pastoral ministry which requires its own skill set. Not everyone is cut out for it, even if they are good, holy, and intelligent men.
Avery Cardinal Dulless turned down his appointment as bishop. Actually, a bishop is free to make administrative changes in his diocese, and to hire new staff, especially if the diocese has just been erected. Our diocese was erected almost nine years ago, so the Ordinary had to start from scratch.

Furthermore, if an incoming bishop sees that the people in place at the Chancery aren’t working out, he can remove them or move them to another place.

Pope Benedict certainly didn’t believe that he was cut out to be a bishop, let alone Archbishop of Munich-Freising, but, he did rather well.

I believe that Fr. Neuhaus would have made an excellent bishop.
 
I heard “Jody” Bottum on Catholic radio this morning and he pledged to carry on. Evidentally he and Fr. Neuhaus were close. I have a great deal of respect for Mr. Bottums. He is not the powerhouse that Fr. Neuhaus was, but I think we will be hearing more of him.
Evidently Joseph Bottom had been taking care of Fr. Neuhaus towards the end. He was really taken the death hard; you could hear it in his voice as he called into Raymond’s program last night.
 
Avery Cardinal Dulless turned down his appointment as bishop. Actually, a bishop is free to make administrative changes in his diocese, and to hire new staff, especially if the diocese has just been erected. Our diocese was erected almost nine years ago, so the Ordinary had to start from scratch.

Furthermore, if an incoming bishop sees that the people in place at the Chancery aren’t working out, he can remove them or move them to another place.
I’m certainly aware that a bishop tends to administrative duties. But the essence of his office and mission is not that, primarily.
Pope Benedict certainly didn’t believe that he was cut out to be a bishop, let alone Archbishop of Munich-Freising, but, he did rather well.
I believe that Fr. Neuhaus would have made an excellent bishop.
But, again, on what grounds and in which context? Someone is not a bishop solo; just as a honorarium of recognition or respect. Make him a monsignor, perhaps, for that surely. The role of the episcopacy, however, exists in relation to a people.

I think that too often there is a tendency to offer our endorsement for a particular priest who we happen to like by suggesting he should be “promoted” in hope of whatever our interests happen to be. Yet that sort of recognition is not necessarily what makes one suitable to serving in such a ministerial role. It has to be something of a match between the bishop and his diocese so that the relationship can be fostered well in a way that upbuilds Christ’s Church worthily.

The best priest might make the worst bishop. The most excellent teacher a poor overseer. The effective administrator unable to deal with difficult people over whom he has little real control.
 
For those of us who esteemed and admired Fr. Richard John Neuhaus, I would suggest that perhaps we make some effort to assist at Mass on Tuesday, as this will be the day of his burial. I will go to Mass and pray for the repose of his soul. In fact, on Thursday, the day he died, I had Mass said for him at the chapel of one of our local hospitals.

I believe that Fr.Neuhaus would have greatly appreciated us storming heaven on his behalf.
 
I do not know if Fr. Neuhaus’ funeral will be broadcast on EWTN. When I contacted the network, they were still trying to make that determiniation. All that I do know is that the auxiliary bishop of New York (and vicar general) will be celebrating the Mass and Fr. De Souza will be preaching the homily.
 
If you are able to tomorrow afternoon, catch a replay of the World Over on ETWN. The second half is dedicated to the Vigil and Funeral of Fr. Richard John Neuhaus. From what I could tell, there were a lot of bishops and priests at the funeral. I have been praying for Fr. Neuhaus ever since I heard he took a turn for the worse and then, when he died.
 
Reading this last sippet from Fr. Neuhaus’ final Public Square column certainly gave me a lump in the throat:
As of this writing, I am contending with a cancer, presently of unknown origin. I am, I am given to believe, under the expert medical care of the Sloan-Kettering clinic here in New York. I am grateful beyond measure for your prayers storming the gates of heaven. Be assured that I neither fear to die nor refuse to live. If it is to die, all that has been is but a slight intimation of what is to be. If it is to live, there is much that I hope to do in the interim. After the last round with cancer fifteen years ago, I wrote a little book, As I Lay Dying (titled after William Faulkner after John Donne), in which I said much of what I had to say about the package deal that is mortality. I did not know that I had so much more to learn. And yes, the question has occurred to me that, if I have but a little time to live, should I be spending it writing this column. I have heard it attributed to figures as various as Brother Lawrence and Martin Luther—when asked what they would do if they knew they were going to die tomorrow, they answered that they would plant a tree and say their prayers. (Luther is supposed to have added that he would quaff his favored beer.) Maybe I have, at least metaphorically, planted a few trees, and certainly I am saying my prayers. Who knew that at this point in life I would be understanding, as if for the first time, the words of Paul, “When I am weak, then I am strong”? This is not a farewell. Please God, we will be pondering together the follies and splendors of the Church and the world for years to come. But maybe not. In any event, when there is an unidentified agent in your body aggressively attacking the good things your body is intended to do, it does concentrate the mind. The entirety of our prayer is “Your will be done”—not as a note of resignation but of desire beyond expression. To that end, I commend myself to your intercession, and that of all the saints and angels who accompany us each step through time toward home.
I know that God’s will must be done, but, I wish that He would have let us have Fr. Neuhaus a little longer.
 
For all of last week and some of this week, firstthings.com has been running some of the best articles of RJN instead of the variety of authors they usually feature. For those who knew of him mostly through his political commentary, his theological articles are pretty amazing. You can still read them, I think, if you go to the bottom of the day’s article and click on “Read more.”
 
I had only known Fr Neuhaus via EWTN tv and radio, but I knew that he was a great priest. All he had to do was speak, and you just had to listen. It’s our loss that he was taken from us, but he is in a better place now, I’m sure. May he receive Gods mercy. He will be missed by everybody.
 
For all of last week and some of this week, firstthings.com has been running some of the best articles of RJN instead of the variety of authors they usually feature. For those who knew of him mostly through his political commentary, his theological articles are pretty amazing. You can still read them, I think, if you go to the bottom of the day’s article and click on “Read more.”
First Things will be publishing a special memorial issue commemorating Fr. Richard John Neuhaus. I am going to buy it.
 
First Things will be publishing a special memorial issue commemorating Fr. Richard John Neuhaus. I am going to buy it.
Let us know when it comes out, please. I’d like to get the magazine shop and grab a copy, also.
 
Let us know when it comes out, please. I’d like to get the magazine shop and grab a copy, also.
The March issue. The Feb. issue just came out, so it should be coming out toward the end of February.
 
The March issue. The Feb. issue just came out, so it should be coming out toward the end of February.
Here it is straight from the First Things website:
The April issue will contain tributes and reminiscences of Fr. Neuhaus. (Click here if you wish to place a memorial or display message in that issue.) The loss of Fr. Neuhaus has made this a hard time for us, hard and wintery cold, but the work he began when he founded First Things will continue.
So, it is the April edition; however, it will probably come out at the end of March.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top