P
pnewton
Guest
One method to determine how much news is factual reporting and how much is the author taking liberties, is to look at the references given. If an article is well documented so that source documentation can be read for context and accuracy, then one is dealing with a more reputable news source. Americans are really gullible targets, hence the plethora of special-interest news sites. They prosper by feeding people what they want to here with the spin that affirms partisan ideologies.This thread concerns the text of the audience on June 1, 2016. As I went through the thread, it’s evident that many of the comments are actually based on the story and not analysing what the Pope said. That’s a fundamental methodological failure
A first year student where I was completed an introduction to theological methodology course; they know when to use secondary source material, and to what advantage, and when to turn to a primary source
]
As to the language used, I would think precise English should be sufficient here, being a lay forum. The greater problems I have encountered are (1) language is used imprecise with excessive emotionally charged words; and (2) opinions are not presented with the humility, deference and charity one finds in discussion from Church authorities. Attitude causes more problems than language.