B
bscastro
Guest
I forgot a BIG one in my list up there - “People shouldn’t be expected to practice self-control”![]()
I forgot a BIG one in my list up there - “People shouldn’t be expected to practice self-control”![]()
:sad_yes:Exactly. The ignorance of some Catholics astounds me. There is no aspect of our lives that is off limits to God, and, therefore, there is no aspect of our lives that should be withheld from a priest during Confession. If this woman was sinning and not confessing it, then she was not a “strong, practicing, confessing Catholic,” regardless of where her sin occurred.
"Reason and justice grip the remotest and the loneliest star. Look at those stars. Don’t they look as if they were single diamonds and sapphires? Well, you can imagine any mad botany or geology you please. Think of forests of adamant with leaves of brilliants. Think the moon is a blue moon, a single elephantine sapphire. But don’t fancy that all that frantic astronomy would make the smallest difference to the reason and justice of conduct. On plains of opal, under cliffs cut out of pearl, you would still find a noticeboard, ‘Thou shalt not steal.’ "
Yep. We stopped using artificial birth control in between our 2nd and 3rd child. We weren’t planning to have a 5th child (10 years younger than the 4th and 20 years younger than the 1st), but his conception wasn’t due to NFP ineffectiveness. My wife knew she was in the iffy zone and told me so. We chose to leave it up to God at that moment, and He blessed us with a wonderful son. My wife would prefer no further blessings, but we are still open to life.I think that we have a skewed view of people 50 years ago. They were, if faithful, using the rhythm, which is not very effective. So, they were faithful, but didn’t necessarily want all of those kids. I’m just saying…
Now, modern day NFP is much more effective. I don’t think those same couples 50 years ago would have had that many kids using NFP.
I don’t doubt the numbers are at least close, as far as this poll is concerned, and I don’t deny that they probably mirror the larger nominal Catholic population pretty closely as well. There are just a lot of ignorant and/or obstinate Catholics out there and that’s been apparent to anyone remotely concerned for a good long while now. The thing I have a problem with is when some of these dissident Catholics want to argue that popularity is somehow a reliable gauge of truth, which can “change” with the times. As you point out, other core truths such as the Real Presence would also have to be swept under the rug if we held to that ridiculous standard.*Come on folks, how can you doubt the numbers are at least close?
Mass attendance: 24-28%.
Confession rates: <10% in most parishes.
Abortion support: nearly the same rates as the general population.
Divorce rates: nearly the same rates as the general population.
Children born: dropping to close to general population rates.
Marriage rates: dropping to close to general population rates.
Living together: nearly the same rates as the general population.
The list goes on…but here is a huge one:
Percentage of Catholics who believe in the Real Present in the Eucharist: 30%!*
If only 30% of Catholics believe that the Eucharist is truly Jesus’ Real Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity, then how can we think the contraception number is wrong?
While you are correct, I doubt the results would have been significantly different even if the poll writers had bothered to make that distinction.OK, where is the key word "Artificial" in this poll. Everyone knows that NFP could be considered “contraception” as are rhythm and abstinence - and are acceptable
if temporary acceptable methods permitted by the Church.
This is like the polls touting “stem cell research” and leaving out “embryonic” (i.e. - killing living embryos to get the stem cells) vs. adult stem cell research which doesn’t kill anyone, has actually helped people, and are a licit option according to the Church.
This is why George Orwell should be mandatory reading in our schools. The scoundrels dink with the language - in what is put in and what is left OUT.
I don’t know about the accuracy of these polls, who is taking them, who they are asking or how the questions are worded … BUT, in lieu of answering this I’ll post an applicable scripture instead:*Come on folks, how can you doubt the numbers are at least close?
Mass attendance: 24-28%.
Confession rates: <10% in most parishes.
Abortion support: nearly the same rates as the general population.
Divorce rates: nearly the same rates as the general population.
Children born: dropping to close to general population rates.
Marriage rates: dropping to close to general population rates.
Living together: nearly the same rates as the general population.
The list goes on…but here is a huge one:
Percentage of Catholics who believe in the Real Present in the Eucharist: 30%!*
If only 30% of Catholics believe that the Eucharist is truly Jesus’ Real Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity, then how can we think the contraception number is wrong?
I see what you are saying. Poll writers could have made a slight distinction and still got results that show many (most?!) Catholics don’t abide by Church teaching in this matter.While you are correct, I doubt the results would have been significantly different even if the poll writers had bothered to make that distinction.
It’s very hard to understand actually. While on one side we say the “old laws” no longer apply in regards to food and such, we STILL return to the sin of Onan as the main defense against contraception. Sorry folks, it doesn’t fly.Shame.
And shell fish ban was for the Old Law, under the Jews. Since Christ came, there have been a number of “bans” that have been lifted, such as eating pork or the necessity of circumcision for salvation. Shell fish fall in that same category.
But the fact is that contraceptives are against the natural purpose of the sex organs - to reproduce (hence why it is called the REPRODUCTIVE system). How hard is it to understand?
So in other words, do as I say and not as I do. It’s like having an addiction, knowing it is wrong, but telling others to resist the temptation.I see what you are saying. Poll writers could have made a slight distinction and still got results that show many (most?!) Catholics don’t abide by Church teaching in this matter.
If it were phrased “Do you as a Catholic oppose Church teaching on the matter of contraception, artificial or approved methods?” the count might be significantly less than 82%
).
Actually I was addressing the validity of the poll given its extreme result - which was probably the “juice” of conducting it. “Look Catholics, your Church is wack!” was the point of even taking the poll IMO.So in other words, do as I say and not as I do. It’s like having an addiction, knowing it is wrong, but telling others to resist the temptation.
It seems we Catholics want the polls to be worded just the way we want. <Nah, just not deceptively would be fine with me. Adding the word “artificial” (which is what was meant, no?) would suffice.
Do you as a Weekly mass attendee, monthly confession going, Eucharist believing, obedient, conservative, homeschooling, ecological breastfeeding, praying the divine office every day,latin chanting, state of grace, virgin till you were married Catholic use birth control? < Gotta hand it to you. This was funny.
maybe then we would get the answers we seek. However
The fact of the matter is most Catholics are not obedient. < I fear you are correct. Most would still be 51%, 82% seems high. Of course I’m thinking of “real” Catholics.
Shame on us. For not being better teachers of our faith and the Gospel. < Amen.
As has been pointed out already, Mosaic Law was fulfilled by Christ. Mosaic Law was given by the wisdom of the Jews for their own people under the Old Covenant. It was based on Divine Law and Natural Law, which do not change. Onan’s sin, like many in the Bible, was against Divine Law. As you may expect, Jesus made no changes or removals from Divine Law in His earthly ministry.It’s very hard to understand actually. While on one side we say the “old laws” no longer apply in regards to food and such, we STILL return to the sin of Onan as the main defense against contraception. Sorry folks, it doesn’t fly.
While I do believe of course that any form on contraception that has a chance of killing an unborn child, (Of course no sterilization either), is morally wrong, I see nothing wrong with any other form, and would probably be included in that 82% if I was asked.
I hear this a lot. people distrusting these poll numbers and you may be right.I distrust the poll numbers. I know many Catholics who are absolutely opposed to artificial contraception, and who practice what they preach.
Still, even if the poll were accurate, it would simply mean that 82% of Catholics are wrong on a Catholic moral doctrine. The doctrine won’t change.
Those who think that contraception is benign should go back, and first read, or re-read Humanae Vitae, then read “Adam and Eve After The Pill” by Mary Eberstadt, and think hard about what the actual societal results of widespread contraception have been.