C
childofmary1143
Guest
int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=29&art_id=nw20070323103114259C870206
Is it true that all Clergy can’t gamble at all?
Is it true that all Clergy can’t gamble at all?
I agree. I think it may be the rule of the Bishops in the Philippines. I would also think that certain orders would prohibit it (e.g. Franciscans). There are some priests and deacons on the Forum. Hopefully, one of them can confirm this.I wasn’t aware that the Church had such a rigid rule. Perhaps it applies only in the Philippines?
On the webpage you referred to, there are some links to related stories. One of them is about American nuns winning $78,000 at the racetrack. int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=29&art_id=qw1048664884579S313
Thanks Joe.The Curt Jester has some discussion of canon law on this.
Scroll down to the third item on March 23.
So, it doesn’t specifically prohibit gambling, but it certainly seems clear to me that gambling would be “unbecoming to their state” and definitely “foreign to the clerical state.”Can. 285 §1. Clerics are to refrain completely from all those things which are unbecoming to their state, according to the prescripts of particular law.
§2. Clerics are to avoid those things which, although not unbecoming, are nevertheless foreign to the clerical state.
Perhaps the USCCB could outsource discipline of the clergy to their brother Bishops in the Philippines?Note that while the news article only mentions the nuns, The Curt Jester column notes a bishop was also criticized for participating and a priest was recently defrocked for gambling. I suppose it made a better news story if it looked like the bishops were picking on women.
They have a serious Council of Bishops in the Phillipines.![]()
I have issues with these codes - I believe they were purposely written to be ambiguous. A nun stopping to play a quick game of hop scotch or double dutch with a group of children - or a Priest stopping for a quick lay-up of basketball can be considered and interpreted by others as unbecoming their state. What the heck does THAT mean? DumbThanks Joe.
So, it doesn’t specifically prohibit gambling, but it certainly seems clear to me that gambling would be “unbecoming to their state” and definitely “foreign to the clerical state.”
I think it was noted in one of the articles that they were not using their own funds. They had been given some guest tokens.Aren’t ALL religious (nuns, monks and sisters) bound by a vow of poverty? If so, then gambling would inherently include the crime of misusing community funds.
Diocesan priests are not necessarily under a vow of poverty, so it might actually be somewhat ambiguous for one of them to be caught. Before anybody goes nuts on unfairness, let’s remember that there is no DRAFT for religious life…
The Church allows gambling for small stakes.I was surprised the article said the Church “opposes all forms of gambling”. What about bingo? Las Vegas night?
Maybe the Church takes a harder stand in the Philippines because it’s a poorer country.
2413 Games of chance (card games, etc.) or wagers are not in themselves contrary to justice. They become morally unacceptable when they deprive someone of what is necessary to provide for his needs and those of others. The passion for gambling risks becoming an enslavement. Unfair wagers and cheating at games constitute grave matter, unless the damage inflicted is so slight that the one who suffers it cannot reasonably consider it significant.