M
marysdaughter1
Guest
Not sure where to put this one… . Has anyone tried this diet? Any suggestions about getting started?
Just looking over what I see on the internet, it looks like it puts heavy emphasis on fresh foods, especially eating lots of vegetables and using natural fats (in other words, avoiding processed foods).Not sure where to put this one… . Has anyone tried this diet? Any suggestions about getting started?
The website says it is based upon the Specific Carbohydrate diet, which says we humans must eat the foods we ate before agriculture began. Since we can’t digest the cultivated foods properly, they cause disease, according to the SCD.Not sure where to put this one… . Has anyone tried this diet? Any suggestions about getting started?
Where does the SCD mention anything about blood type? Are you sure you’re not confusing it with something else?The website says it is based upon the Specific Carbohydrate diet, which is bunk. People’s blood types do not affect what foods they should or shouldn’t eat.
Sorry, yes I was, Eating Right for Your Blood Type is another fad diet. I will correct my post.Where does the SCD mention anything about blood type? Are you sure you’re not confusing it with something else?
Yeah, that was another fad diet that was big about 2 years ago. It’s kind of faded off the scene though.Blood Type? What? hahaha.
This is the problem with most “diets”. Most people don’t need a diet to lose weight and be healthier…they need a change in lifestyle. That’s why when folks who were on a diet stop, they often regain weight quickly. Instead of learning healthy eating habits, they relied too much on just following the diet, or eating the ready-made mail-order food (yuck!) or whatever. So much of weight loss is about making the psychological change, to determine once and for all that you are going to develop healthy eating habits and stick with them.Thank you all -I’ve been trying to eat more “local” for a bit now. More fresh (in season) veggies and just more balanced. I’ve also been trying to include probiotics in my diet - supposed to be very healthy.
Juliane - I’m with you on diets that claim to cure everything under the sun. I’ve heard of people having good results with the Gap diet, but mostly they do it for a set time and not forever.
I don’t think probiotics are necessary for most people. Your gut actually contains everything it needs to and does everything it needs to and if you are having GI issues, then go to the doctor instead of trying to supplement it away.Thank you all -I’ve been trying to eat more “local” for a bit now. More fresh (in season) veggies and just more balanced. I’ve also been trying to include probiotics in my diet - supposed to be very healthy.
Juliane - I’m with you on diets that claim to cure everything under the sun. I’ve heard of people having good results with the Gap diet, but mostly they do it for a set time and not forever.
No, but apparently that’s enough knowledge/experience for them to declare it a “fad.”It doesn’t look like anyone else who has replied has actually done the GAPS diet.
Well, there are many reasons for the higher prevalence of disease. I don’t think we can discount the harm we have done to our food sources though. I think by far, the food industry has made our food more dangerous, not safer. I mean, look at Monsanto! We’ve actually changed wheat from what it once was into something very different, through cross-breeding. Scientists have gone back and tested blood samples from 50 years ago (after antibiotics had come into general use, I might add) and compared to new samples and found that the incidence of celiac disease has risen fourfold. So, it’s not just a greater awareness or better diagnosis. The disease is now effecting way more people than it used to and most believe this is due to changes in the food industry - check it out . Beyond that, we now know through scientific study that gluten sensitivity does exist, outside of celiac disease.Just a word of common sense.
The reason lots of diseases seem to be more prevalent now is that we have the means to live long enough to die of a disease like cancer, instead of dying of an infection when there weren’t any antibiotics. The food industry has also made a lot of what we eat SAFER instead of making it more dangerous.
Again, “higher prevalence of disease,” but the average lifespan only increases and we are healthier overall than we have ever been. The food companies try to improve foods, not in sinister ways, but to make the plants more resistant to disease in order to feed more people (and of course, make profits).Well, there are many reasons for the higher prevalence of disease. I don’t think we can discount the harm we have done to our food sources though. I think by far, the food industry has made our food more dangerous, not safer. I mean, look at Monsanto! We’ve actually changed wheat from what it once was into something very different, through cross-breeding. Scientists have gone back and tested blood samples from 50 years ago (after antibiotics had come into general use, I might add) and compared to new samples and found that the incidence of celiac disease has risen fourfold. So, it’s not just a greater awareness or better diagnosis. The disease is now effecting way more people than it used to and most believe this is due to changes in the food industry - check it out . Beyond that, we now know through scientific study that gluten sensitivity does exist, outside of celiac disease.
I guess I just kick it old school though so you can take what I say with a grain of salt. I research things way too much, spend too much time reading medical journals for fun. And I grow my own fruits and vegetables in my backyard, Biblical style. I’m not a fan of dairy especially considering that 75% of the world’s popularity have intolerance to cow’s milk but I’d rather see it raw than ultra-pasteurized.