Gay Adoption Issue Spurs Bigoted Furor

[bones_IV]

This article goes to show you how closeminded liberal Catholics really are. Here’s the stinger. “It’s open season on the Catholic Church. The bullies need to be beaten back and branded as the bigots they are.” Donohue is right on the mark again! I thank the Lord above that the Vatican has stood up to these gay activists who claim themselves to be Catholic but manifest in heresy. Liberal Catholics I’m so sick of you.

Link

 

[WanderAimlessly]

Sounds like they are threatening voilence against us. Fine, bring it on.

PF

 

[trustmc]

WanderAimlessly:

Sounds like they are threatening voilence against us. Fine, bring it on.

PF

Actually, it was Donohue who made the remark about beating back the bullies in reference to liberals. If it sounded like a threat to you, then it’s a threat. But it was made by a conservative, not a liberal. :tsktsk:

Mike

 

[WanderAimlessly]

trustmc:

Actually, it was Donohue who made made the remark about beating back the bullies in reference to liberals. If it sounded like a threat to you, then it’s a threat. But it was made by a conservative, not a liberal. :tsktsk:

Mike

It was the liberals who I was talking about. The liberals have increasingly shown a rabid gang mentality in the past number of years. Time to stand up to them.

PF

 

[Chickamauga]

It was incredibly shrill editorial. It reads, in part:

It was in 1960 that John F. Kennedy confronted anti-Catholic bias in a famous speech … ''I believe in an America . . . where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the pope, the National Council of Churches, or any other ecclesiastical source," he said. ''I do not speak for my church on public matters, and the Church does not speak for me." This ringing embrace of church-state separation, confirmed by Kennedy’s election, settled the issue once and for all, one hoped. Now Romney is out to turn it on its head

Blatant propaganda. Since when did a speech made by a nominally-Catholic former President become the law of the land and settle the church-state seperation issue and the Catholic church’s influence in America once and for all?

 

[T.A.Stobie_SFO]

Well the liberals want to impose “Freedom From Religion” on anyone doing anything with any government in any form thus advocating a national religion of atheism and hedonism.

 

[LRThunder]

T.A.Stobie:

Well the liberals want to impose “Freedom From Religion” on anyone doing anything with any government in any form thus advocating a national religion of atheism and hedonism.

Can’t they go to China for that? That’s a nation that’s pretty much believes in “Freedom from Religion.”

 

[T.A.Stobie_SFO]

LRThunder:

Can’t they go to China for that? That’s a nation that’s pretty much believes in “Freedom from Religion.”

I wish they would go. ACLU and all the liberals advocating anti-Christian livestyles (which includes most of Hollywood).

 

[Annunciata]

From our local news station here in Boston:

The Hiller Instinct

I don’t have an easy answer, but I do have an easy question: If the Catholic Church can discriminate when it wants to, why can’t you?

I was so angered by this reporter that I totally lost my sense of the supernatural and…well never mind you get the picture…

 

[Annunciata]

Annunciata:

From our local news station here in Boston:

The Hiller Instinct


I was so angered by this reporter that I totally lost my sense of the supernatural and…well never mind you get the picture…

BTW, I blasted him w/ an e-mail and reported him to The Catholic League.

 

[maggieodae]

Annunciata:

BTW, I blasted him w/ an e-mail and reported him to The Catholic League.

I sent the twit a email too.

Quote: You Wrote…I don’t have an easy answer, but I do have an easy question: If the Catholic Church can discriminate when it wants to, why can’t you?

If the church were to allow such immorality it would defy Christ and God himself. Ain’t gonna happen

How dare you ask such a stupid, secular, bigoted nitwit question. Obviously you missed a few things in the moral decency code of honor all the way around. Gay’s, while very much children of God are performing evil and have no business around children. End of story Joe Blow.

On the other hand…it seems to be the norm for idiots these days

 

[aimee]

maggieodae:

I sent the twit a email too.

I shall send him one in French

 

[maggieodae]

aimee:

I shall send him one in French

 

[maggieodae]

Well, he certainly fired back an email quick.

thanks for your e-mail. concerning your main points:

If the church were to allow such immorality it would defy Christ and God himself. Ain’t gonna happen

are you aware that catholic charities has placed several children with same sex couples in the past

Gay’s, while very much children of God are performing evil and have no business around children. End of story Joe Blow.

that may be your personal opinion, but the end of the story is more likely to be the state constitution.  the church does not have to facilitate adoptions if it does not want to....but if it does, it cannot discriminate against same sex couples.  if enough voters agree with you, the constitution can be changed...and legislators who share your opinion can be elected.  then the constitution could be amended and there would be no conflict. that would be a secular solution, which i hope you don't find  stupid, bigoted, and nitwit.

 

[WanderAimlessly]

maggieodae:

Well, he certainly fired back an email quick.

Send any correspondence you have with this person to the Catholic League. It will bolster their case against this person and his rag.

The days of sitting idly by while these people walk all over us is over. It is time we do the walking. Yes I know it sounds uncharitable, but we are not doormats.

PF

 

[maggieodae]

WanderAimlessly:

Send any correspondence you have with this person to the Catholic League. It will bolster their case against this person and his rag.

The days of sitting idly by while these people walk all over us is over. It is time we do the walking. Yes I know it sounds uncharitable, but we are not doormats.

PF

I replied.

I find it rather pathetic that you think the church must be immoral to suit secularism and state laws. The church will no longer provide adoptions services and that is our right. No way we will continue providing fodder for the canons of immorality. While it is true these children deserve good homes, the state cannot force Catholics to condone evil. So just what’s your problem? These little innocents can be adopted into the quagmire you so love elsewhere.

You can’t have it both ways. And FYI…My mother was an orphan train rider way back in the bad old days. I am well aware of the plight of orphans and no amount of BS will make me consider the church has to bow to idiots.

If the law changes…fine. Meantime don’t you dare blast the Catholic Faith for no longer bowing to evil idiots.

The Catholic Charity liberal nitwits who did that are not THE CHURCH. They have been told and now the line is drawn in the sand. They are CINO’s who no longer have a right to speak for the church and never did. They just got their waterloo.

Thank the Good Lord.! May I say…“Don’t let the door hit em in the backside on the way out.” And you may whine all you want to until judgment day.

 

[Jennifer123]

WanderAimlessly:

It was the liberals who I was talking about. The liberals have increasingly shown a rabid gang mentality in the past number of years. Time to stand up to them.

PF

Just my opinion, but I’ve always thought that if/when they lose the culture war, it could turn to violence. If they can’t get what they want through the voters, they go to the legislatures/courts. If/when that fails, then we should watch ourselves. Just my two cents.

 

[WanderAimlessly]

Jennifer123:

Just my opinion, but I’ve always thought that if/when they lose the culture war, it could turn to violence. If they can’t get what they want through the voters, they go to the legislatures/courts. If/when that fails, then we should watch ourselves. Just my two cents.

I see that happening too. They seem to be prone to fits of anger when they do not get their way. Just look at all the “peace” protests that turn violent.

PF

 

[EDB]

Annunciata:

From our local news station here in Boston:

The Hiller Instinct


I was so angered by this reporter that I totally lost my sense of the supernatural and…well never mind you get the picture…

This is exactly why I no longer watch Channel 7 news. The others aren’t much better, but not as blatant either.

 

[maggieodae]

Well, he is still trying to argue his own way.

This mornings missive and my reply:

----- Original Message -----
From: “Andy Hiller”

thank you for the time you have spent on this. finally: if the church
doesn’t want to place baies with all couples, so be it. but when it
pursues an exemption, it pits church teachings against the constitution.

Hardly…If you are unfamiliar with the Orphan Trains, I suggest you read up on it. Those children were packed on Trains and given out across the country. Most of the older ones were actually adopted by people who simply wanted a kid to work on the farm and gave them little to no love. They wanted free slave labor. Having witnessed the destruction and heartache many
of those children lived through, I should think a lesson would have been learned. Children are not property, nor are they put on this earth to make Adults feel good about their own short comings. Gay couples are NOT good for children.

Gay Adoption is another horrible exploitation of children…Children who should have a stable loving home. Children who were not born to assuage the immorality of Homosexual people who want it all and want nothing but their own way. They could care less about the children. They just want to advance their agenda of immorality and destruction of the Family.

The Catholic Church has every right to oppose such evil…nay, by the very foundations of the Church, we must oppose it and we shall.

Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The church’s request for a conscience clause should have been
unobjectionable, at least to anyone whose priority is rescuing kids from foster care. Those who spurned that request out of hand must believe that adoption is designed primarily for the benefit of adults, not children."