R
Rhubarb
Guest
I know you’d say yes. But does the data say yes? I mean, maybe it does. I don’t know. But until we know, then we’re just guessing.I’d say yes.
I know you’d say yes. But does the data say yes? I mean, maybe it does. I don’t know. But until we know, then we’re just guessing.I’d say yes.
Only if it was a sappy religious drama, which is a shame because I’d love to see someone like me in a story I’d like. But of course, not even straight characters on tv share my values, so I doubt it’ll ever happen.Think a show about a GLBTQ person living the Catholic Faith would fly?
I’m sure Fr Coleman who confirmed Nicole at age 12 and also presided over her nuptials with Keith would’ve advised her of the proper processes.Did she get an annulment from Tom Cruise and if so, how did she get it so quickly?
Not to mention the ‘unnatural bulge’ in Robin’s costume in the ‘Batman and Robin’ shows that MeTV or/and Antenna TV still show in reruns. Holy TV Censors, Batman!They’ve been doing that since at least the time of Star Trek.
Ted Danson put it best “The marvelous thing was, it [all] went right over the network’s heads. But the 14 and 16 yo in the audience knew what they were talking about”.
It would be interesting to see if that ever appears. We’ve certainly seen shows about priests and nuns.Except that TV doesn’t really normalize anything except entertain people about sexuality minus the unforeseen consequences of what could happen.
Also, I noticed the use of GLBTQ in the prior post. Not all GLBTQ persons are active in homosexuality. Think a show about a GLBTQ person living the Catholic Faith would fly?
Not recently at least but there have been showsIt would be interesting to see if that ever appears. We’ve certainly seen shows about priests and nuns.
Celebrities are human like everyone else but they are purposely put in the public spotlight. If an actress accepts a role where she is asked to model bad and immoral behavior then she is not a good role model and is sending the wrong message. I would say such criticism is fair. The Hollywood trade tells of actresses that have turned down roles for various reasons, including being asked to appear nude or partly nude or for other reasons. One quit Hollywood. In the past, one compromise was using a “body double” for certain scenes so the viewer would think it’s her but it’s not, just someone with the same figure and hairstyle, usually from the back.Agreed. I recall a recent interview that Nicole Kidman did where she said her Catholic faith is a huge part of her life and is a deciding factor in what roles she accepts. Watching some of her movies it might raise eyebrows and cause people to wonder “is that really what Catholicism accepts/condones?”.
It’s not fair on the person in the spotlight but their comments are often misconstrued and add to the confusion regarding the Church especially in those who could not be bothered researching what the Church really teaches.
You mean…James Bond?Maybe? Probably. I mean, subject to artistic licence. I’m sure a story about a** mild-mannered ornithologist **deserves to have their story told, but if it’s not interesting or compelling, it won’t be. TV is a business, after all.
This stuff really bugs me… the implication that no one can love someone of the same sex without being sexually attracted to them… it’s appalling and it’s horribly narrow. It also feeds into the false idea that anyone who would say that this is narrow must therefore be against the idea of “two people loving each other…” it just never ends.on Once Upon a Time, they are trying to turn Mulan and Red Riding hood into lesbians - implying that two women can not be friends but they MUST turn into lesiban lovers.