R
RosaryFan
Guest
???Using their morality and/or theology - does homosexuality hurt anybody? If the answer is no, then we have no right to use our theology to tell them not to.

???Using their morality and/or theology - does homosexuality hurt anybody? If the answer is no, then we have no right to use our theology to tell them not to.
We still have the freedom to send our kids to another school. I don’t agree with the public schools being used as a liberal training camp either, and that’s why I’m looking into private schools now. We have all the freedom in the world not to patronize the schools that do this!First, I want to address Catholicguy100’s assertion that our Country’s religious freedom isn’t in jeopardy. When schools will soon be forced to teach children that homosexual behavior is an “option”, and that our sexual preference is a matter of choice, where is your religious freedom then?
You are using your (our) theology and morality to make that argument. How is this not forcing our beliefs on other people? If we start doing this where does it stop? I don’t want to find myself in the minority someday. These freedoms belong to all of us, not just those that agree with us. As religious folks, it should be us that are fighting for them, because we benefit from them more than the atheists!Now, I’ll address the issue of harm to society (I’m glad you asked)…
It distorts truth by taking an evil (homosexual marriage) and making it look like good; and by taking good (defense of marriage) and making it appear evil. Were we not strongly warned against this? Hmmm… now what clever entity could possibly be responsible for this distortion of truth? Let’s think…
I said using THEIR theology or morality… at the beginning of that statement.???Didn’t you say this?
I could interpret for this post that you don’t think truth matters. Morality is about the truth of how humans ought to behave in order to by happy. Selling untruth (immorality) as truth cannot bring happiness nor freedom.We still have the freedom to send our kids to another school. I don’t agree with the public schools being used as a liberal training camp either, and that’s why I’m looking into private schools now. We have all the freedom in the world not to patronize the schools that do this!
You are using your (our) theology and morality to make that argument. How is this not forcing our beliefs on other people? If we start doing this where does it stop? I don’t want to find myself in the minority someday. These freedoms belong to all of us, not just those that agree with us. As religious folks, it should be us that are fighting for them, because we benefit from them more than the atheists!
What other school? Before you know it, there will be no more Catholic schools, homeschooling will be illegal, and public schools will all be forced to add this garbage to the curriculum. Maybe I could move to the moon?We still have the freedom to send our kids to another school. I don’t agree with the public schools being used as a liberal training camp either, and that’s why I’m looking into private schools now. We have all the freedom in the world not to patronize the schools that do this!
You are using your (our) theology and morality to make that argument. How is this not forcing our beliefs on other people? If we start doing this where does it stop? I don’t want to find myself in the minority someday. These freedoms belong to all of us, not just those that agree with us. As religious folks, it should be us that are fighting for them, because we benefit from them more than the atheists!
I think preventing two persons from loving each other or expressing this love is in somehow ‘evil’ , immorality is measured by how much harm you cause to others and homosexuels are not harming anyone, if you consider that they destroy the family, I see that accepting them and their rights might be a good lesson to our children of what love and acceptance truly are. Even homosexuality is not a choice, so why would God create them the way they are, then forbid them from expressing their love?!First, I want to address Catholicguy100’s assertion that our Country’s religious freedom isn’t in jeopardy. When schools will soon be forced to teach children that homosexual behavior is an “option”, and that our sexual preference is a matter of choice, where is your religious freedom then?
Now, I’ll address the issue of harm to society (I’m glad you asked)…
It distorts truth by taking an evil (homosexual marriage) and making it look like good; and by taking good (defense of marriage) and making it appear evil. Were we not strongly warned against this? Hmmm… now what clever entity could possibly be responsible for this distortion of truth? Let’s think…
Last, but certainly not least, it is a blatant attack on the family, which is the backbone of society. Without the backbone, we won’t be able to stand. Without the strength of the family, where does that place society?
Again, think about the purpose of marriage in our society. To create a healthy environment for the continuation of our species. Once that is distorted and bastardized, then it is an attack on the very strength of our society.
Case in point.I think preventing two persons from loving each other or expressing this love is in somehow ‘evil’ , immorality is measured by how much harm you cause to others and homosexuels are not harming anyone, if you consider that they destroy the family, I see that accepting them and their rights might be a good lesson to our children of what love and acceptance truly are. Even homosexuality is not a choice, so why would God create them the way they are, then forbid them from expressing their love?!
You would be absolutely wrong in that interpretation.I could interpret for this post that you don’t think truth matters. Morality is about the truth of how humans ought to behave in order to by happy. Selling untruth (immorality) as truth cannot bring happiness nor freedom.
Free to believe and free to do are two different things.Shouldn’t everyone be free to believe what they want?
Right, but doesn’t “free will” consist both?Free to believe and free to do are two different things.
Nobody is debating that it’s wrong to kill people. I am saying that if you ask a homosexual what truth is or what wrong is they will invariably give a different answer than you just provided. Why is your opinion more valid than theirs? Are they second class citizens somehow?I’m not using my theology. What is wrong is wrong. It’s also wrong (theologically) to kill someone. Isn’t that forcing “Thou shalt not kill” on everyone else?
Opinions don’t define the truth.Nobody is debating that it’s wrong to kill people. I am saying that if you ask a homosexual what truth is or what wrong is they will invariably give a different answer than you just provided. Why is your opinion more valid than theirs? Are they second class citizens somehow?
This has been tried before, by the Catholic Church no less. Do I need to remind you how it worked last time?How does warning someone about an agregious sin, and preventing it from being legal…
Relevance?This has been tried before, by the Catholic Church no less. Do I need to remind you how it worked last time?
Why do you think that a God gets offended so quickly about two homosexuals having a relation? Maybe it would be better if he gets offended more on major things as wars, diseases, starvation, injustice and cruelties.Both are an affront against the human person and are grievious offenses against God.
This is CRAZY!!! All of these Catholics arguing about politics within a society. Are we here to serve man or God. As a Catholic, my job is to take Gods word and share it with everyone. It wasn’t a request when Jesus told the apostles to make diciples of EVERY NATION. He commanded us to do so. Gods will is spelled out in the bible. This bible that has been protected and handed down by his church is the TRUTH. Thats the only truth that matters. I hear talks in this forum about different denominations. Jesus built on church (singular not plural.) We choose whether to accept this or reject it. Thats what the free will is for. You either accept Jesus Christ and ALL his teachings, or reject Jesus Christ and ALL his teachings. You can’t pick and choose what to accept and call it freewill and think thats ok with God. Don’t get me wrong accepting God and everything it comes with is not easy. If it was everyone would do it with no problem. Its a work in progress. The more we learn about him the easier it gets to see the truth.Nobody is debating that it’s wrong to kill people. I am saying that if you ask a homosexual what truth is or what wrong is they will invariably give a different answer than you just provided. Why is your opinion more valid than theirs? Are they second class citizens somehow?
Who says he doesn’t get offended by major things as wars, diseases, starvation, injustice and cruelties?Why do you think that a God gets offended so quickly about two homosexuals having a relation? Maybe it would be better if he gets offended more on major things as wars, diseases, starvation, injustice and cruelties.
While I can appreciate where this sentiment is coming from, this is very dangerous.Bottom line for me is that we live in a free country. It’s a rare place in the world that allows us to practice our religion without government influence. This is a great thing!!
In order to protect that we must rebuff any effort from an individual, regardless of the source; to push religion and religious beliefs on other people. Homosexuality is one of those circumstances. I don’t like it, don’t condone it, and don’t want to be near it. But I do believe that the alternative is risking the very rights that allow us to practice our religion. Not everyone shares our views, and we all have the right to the pursuit of happiness.
Using their morality and/or theology - does homosexuality hurt anybody? If the answer is no, then we have no right to use our theology to tell them not to.
What’s wrong with this? Is the Catholic Church in the business of promoting subjective value judgments or absolute truths?You are using your (our) theology and morality to make that argument. How is this not forcing our beliefs on other people?
Recognizing that marriage is the union of man and woman hardly prevents “two persons from loving each other or exprtessing this love.” By contrast, gays’ demand that marriage be rewritten to include their perversions is a demand for more than just tolerance – it is a demand that society POSITIVELY ENDORSE their behaviors with legal and financial benefits. Why should we do this?I think preventing two persons from loving each other or expressing this love is in somehow ‘evil’ , immorality is measured by how much harm you cause to others and homosexuels are not harming anyone, if you consider that they destroy the family, I see that accepting them and their rights might be a good lesson to our children of what love and acceptance truly are. Even homosexuality is not a choice, so why would God create them the way they are, then forbid them from expressing their love?!
This is as good as saying that there are no truths at all!You would be absolutely wrong in that interpretation.
There are tens of thousands of different religions and sects within religions in the world. I think that all have their own form of truth that they believe in. I happen to agree with you regarding truth, but why should “our” truth be the one that an entire nation follows?
Our “opinion” is objective truth, that’s what makes it more valid than their vapid, self-serving emoting.Nobody is debating that it’s wrong to kill people. I am saying that if you ask a homosexual what truth is or what wrong is they will invariably give a different answer than you just provided. Why is your opinion more valid than theirs? Are they second class citizens somehow?
I’m curious as to what it is you’re referring to here, so please, do remind me.This has been tried before, by the Catholic Church no less. Do I need to remind you how it worked last time?
Whether or not rampant sexual immorality constitutes a “major” or “minor” “thing” is precisely what is at question here.Why do you think that a God gets offended so quickly about two homosexuals having a relation? Maybe it would be better if he gets offended more on major things as wars, diseases, starvation, injustice and cruelties.