Gay marriage : who cares?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nexttogodliness
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You think it’s “judging” homosexuals to protest gay marriage and noncelibate same sex attraction?

Are you saying you wouldn’t judge if your compassionate Catholic son, began dating a bisexual girl?
No I wouldn’t b/c A. It’s up to god, not me to judge ones character and B. Science has proving bisexuality and homosexuality are genetic. I often associate the whole " sinful gay" situation with the " sinful left handedness" situation in medeival times
 
Why do we care about gay marriage? We do nothing active to stop divorcees from re marrying outside the church so why would we stop homosexual from marrying outside the church. Counterpoints are welcome. Just don’t spew hate about gay people. Thx
I would submit that most of the opposition to gay marriage is based on personal distaste of gays dressed up in theological rationale to look more respectable. The Prop 8 crowd insists, “no, it’s nothing personal against gays, but our faith is very clear on matters of marriage.” Taking them at their word, for the moment, I point out that their faith would also DEMAND equal attention to equal evils - ie marriage of divorcees, which is simply sanctioned adultery in church law, marriages between reproductively able couples who employ birth control, even sterilization.

As the Christian conservatives are so fond of saying, you can’t pick and choose your beliefs. If your faith really demands crusades to bend civil law to your beliefs to defend the sanctity of marriage, you sign on for the whole crusade. The threat to “Christian marriage” posed by hetero people is vastly greater than that posed by gay people who would marry. At a minimum, you would expect to see equal attention to pass laws and constitutional amendments forbidding re-marriage, demanding good faith efforts to procreate etc. To my knowledge, not a dime has been raised or spent to “defend marriage” from non-gay assault.

When I point that out to them, then there’s a lot of hemming and hawing. “Well we couldn’t do those things, that would invade people’s privacy.” So some mortal sins don’t warrant government intrusion, only those sins that make us (oops, I mean God), feel really oogie…
 
Why do we care about gay marriage? We do nothing active to stop divorcees from re marrying outside the church so why would we stop homosexual from marrying outside the church. Counterpoints are welcome. Just don’t spew hate about gay people. Thx
This post is thought-provoking and I have some more questions for people who are well versed in law.

Let’s consider these 3 situations:
  1. Two gay men, or perhaps a small community of gay men (let’s say up to 10 people) live together. They are sexually active.
  2. A small community of Franciscan brothers living together. They are sexually abstinent.
  3. Two elderly brothers, WWII veterans with a failing health, are living together. They are sexually abstinent.
Do our current laws permit these 3 communities to take care of each other, including hospital visitation rights, the ability to make decisions for a sick community member, the ability to inherit upon someone’s death, etc? What do we have currently, on the legal side? Domestic partnerships, power of attorneys, etc? Frankly I do not care whether the gays are having sex with each other, or whether the Franciscan monks and the two elderly brothers are sexually abstinent. But do we have a legal system to allow them to take care of each other, and I mean a legal system that’s not privy to what goes on in these people’s bedrooms, a system that protects and empowers people without asking questions about their sexual practices? That’s what I would call equal protection under the law.
 
When will homosexual marriage concern you ?

Will it concern you when your children, grandchild and great grandchild are taught in public schools that the sexual acts of homosexuals are normal and that bisexuality is normal?

**No
**
When speech against homosexual sex acts are classified as “hate speech”?

Definitely not.

Is it a concern when, " Gay and bisexual men (MSM) comprise 76.1% of AIDS cases"?

**Not my concern. And I am sure that is an american statistic because most people in the world with aids are heterosexual.
**
Or when your children, grandchild, etc. begin dating within a society that approves of homosexuality and bisexuality?

**No, that wouldn’t bother me at all. And to be honest our society already approves homosexuality and bisexuality. If they aren’t gay, then why would it matter if someone else was? I am pretty sure its not contagious. **
My answers are in bold. I have a son and I will make sure to teach him that some people are homosexuals and it is normal.
 
It won’t concern me because my kid is Catholic. He has the best foundation and a clear moral compass.

Further, you cannot force people not to sin. They have a choice given to them by God.

In the words of St. Therese - Do not set yourself up as Judge - that is God’s right alone. Your only mission is to be an angel of peace.
Do you think being Catholic is going to stop someone from being gay or something?
 
You think it’s “judging” homosexuals to protest gay marriage and noncelibate same sex attraction?

Are you saying you wouldn’t judge if your compassionate Catholic son, began dating a bisexual girl?
lol, why would it matter if a guy dated a bisexual girl? I don’t understand how that would be a bad thing? Do you think she would turn him gay or something.

Some of you are legitimately homophobic. You genuinely seem to fear interacting with homosexuals.
 
The question isn’t whether we can force people not to sin, but about legalizing gay marriage, which we can prevent.
I read with interest your words that St. Teresa said to never judge, and no doubt there is some truth in what you say. However, I recall St. Therese praying for a murderer who was going to be executed. She didn’t know him, except from the newspapers. She prayed that he repent–and he did at the very last hour. and she knew that it was because of her prayers. But did she ever think she could not judge that what he did was a sin? Instead she prayed for his repentance.
You can prevent gay marriage, but you can’t prevent the sin of homosexual sex. And is the marriage even sinful, or just the act of consummating it? And if it is just the act of consummating it, whether the people are married or not doesn’t matter.
 
No I wouldn’t b/c A. It’s up to god, not me to judge ones character and B. Science has proving bisexuality and homosexuality are genetic. I often associate the whole " sinful gay" situation with the " sinful left handedness" situation in medeival times
Science hasn’t proven that bisexuality and homosexuality is genetic.
 
I don’t know if it’s ok to call people “queer.” I’ve never heard that term being used in a good way. Enlighten me if I’m wrong. If I’m right, this should be removed immediately.
My understanding that it depends on the context. Some universities with “GLBT Studies” programs call them “Queer Studies” programs
Science hasn’t proven that bisexuality and homosexuality is genetic.
Indeed, there are even some homosexuals social theorists such as Foucault or Paglia that claim the exact opposite.

Of course I am a disciple of neither of them but I have never been really given conclusive proof that homosexuality is genetic. That doesn’t mean that one day you wake up and go “I think I’ll be gay”, just because your genes don’t say that you must be a certain way doesn’t mean that you choose to be a certain way.
 
I don’t think it’s our business. If they want to be Catholic, they would not be engaging in homosexual activity. If they are not Catholic, it is their own business. Just like God gave us the choice to serve him or die, homosexuals have a choice too.

That is not to say homosexuals die, it is to say that any that do not come to the Father through the son will die.

With regards to what the government does and what people of other religions do, I believe Christ was clear on that - “give to Caesar what is his.”
Christ was asked if it was lawful to pay taxes.

There are two groups in this country: One that follows their own beliefs and those who understand the beliefs of their religion.

Everyone has one vote and vote as they see fit.

Have a look at what’s going on in Massachusetts right now:

massresistance.org/

So, Catholics should just say: Hey. What’s the big deal?

God bless,
Ed
 
With all due respect, I did not have counsel with a priest and my pre-Cana classes were not sufficient for me to understand the sacrament fully. The job being done is not good enough.
I respectfully urge everyone who has had a similar experience to contact their Bishop. Little will be done just by posting on an internet forum.

God bless,
Ed
 
It won’t concern me because my kid is Catholic. He has the best foundation and a clear moral compass.

Further, you cannot force people not to sin. They have a choice given to them by God.

In the words of St. Therese - Do not set yourself up as Judge - that is God’s right alone. Your only mission is to be an angel of peace.
This is not about judging but about Church teaching. And now, I think people should know what the other side of the coin is: any negative comments about homosexual acts is regarded as hate speech. So how will anyody’s kids give a clear answer about this when they are adults?

When ‘gay marriage’ was defeated in Michigan, a letter promptly appeared in the newspaper. The person who wrote that letter called Michigan: “the great hate state.”

God bless,
Ed
 
OP makes a salient point about civil weddings being possible for straight couples and not homosexual ones. It doesn’t make sense to be campaigning in particular against gay marriages and not non-church weddings across the board. No wonder there’s such a bad ‘anti-gay’ attitude amongst Catholics.
There is no ‘anti-gay’ attitude among Catholics. It seems some people have no idea what the history of homosexuality is in this country.

First, there was never a right for homosexuals to marry.

Second. Prior to 1973, and I say this in charity and for accuracy, homosexuality was listed as a disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual used by psychiatrists. Then, in 1973, by nonscientific vote, it was decided to remove it as a disorder. How can a disorder suddenly become not a disorder? By the documented efforts of gay activists.

Knowing this, how can anyone support a continuation of a disordered relationship of two people of the same sex?

The New York Times tells us that many gay couples who commit to each other are not monogamous. I mention this because some gay activists are attempting to portray gay marriage as 100% equal in every way to heterosexual marriage.

nytimes.com/2010/01/29/us/29sfmetro.html

God bless,
Ed
 
Christ was asked if it was lawful to pay taxes.

There are two groups in this country: One that follows their own beliefs and those who understand the beliefs of their religion.

Everyone has one vote and vote as they see fit.

Have a look at what’s going on in Massachusetts right now:

massresistance.org/

So, Catholics should just say: Hey. What’s the big deal?

God bless,
Ed
Dear Ed,
That is not a legitimate news source and appears to be a propaganda machine spewing hate. Further, Christ would not condemn (though he could if he wanted to) sinners, he would be near them, teaching them. He finds joy in loving them and bringing them to the Father as should each of us. Who do you believe Christ would be spending time with if he were on earth…the healthy or the sick?
 
No I wouldn’t b/c A. It’s up to god, not me to judge ones character and B. Science has proving bisexuality and homosexuality are genetic. I often associate the whole " sinful gay" situation with the " sinful left handedness" situation in medeival times
Science has proven no such thing.

narth.com/docs/hope.html

Some people are, in fact, born with certain conditions but they seek treatment. They don’t throw up their hands and think, “Oh well. There’s nothing I can do or should do about this.”

God bless,
Ed
 
I would submit that most of the opposition to gay marriage is based on personal distaste of gays dressed up in theological rationale to look more respectable. The Prop 8 crowd insists, “no, it’s nothing personal against gays, but our faith is very clear on matters of marriage.” Taking them at their word, for the moment, I point out that their faith would also DEMAND equal attention to equal evils - ie marriage of divorcees, which is simply sanctioned adultery in church law, marriages between reproductively able couples who employ birth control, even sterilization.

As the Christian conservatives are so fond of saying, you can’t pick and choose your beliefs. If your faith really demands crusades to bend civil law to your beliefs to defend the sanctity of marriage, you sign on for the whole crusade. The threat to “Christian marriage” posed by hetero people is vastly greater than that posed by gay people who would marry. At a minimum, you would expect to see equal attention to pass laws and constitutional amendments forbidding re-marriage, demanding good faith efforts to procreate etc. To my knowledge, not a dime has been raised or spent to “defend marriage” from non-gay assault.

When I point that out to them, then there’s a lot of hemming and hawing. “Well we couldn’t do those things, that would invade people’s privacy.” So some mortal sins don’t warrant government intrusion, only those sins that make us (oops, I mean God), feel really oogie…
Once again, this type of argument is based on a serious lack of historical knowledge.

In order to reach this point, things had to occur in a particular order to make sin acceptable to people.

How long have we had divorce in this country? Now long have we had so-called gay marriage? It was never a right. It is called that but it is an invented right.

The goal and mission has always been this: To Make Any Type Of Sexual Situation Imaginable OK. Got that? That has always been the goal. That is why Canada is dealing with polyamory right now. First gay marriage, then you push for multiple sex partners.

But in order to plant the seed of gay marriage, you must first lay the groundwork.

1960 The Birth Control Pill.

1970s Legalize graphic pornography and open Adult Bookstores, topless bars and strip clubs.
Make sure to publish Swinger magazines so people who are not sexual perverts will be tempted to become ones.

1972 Market the X-Rated movie Deep Throat like it was a regular movie. Rail against the Christians for getting it banned in 22 States.

We want our Sexual Freedom!!!

1980s No-Fault Divorce. No kids? $75 and you’re out. Great, isn’t it? When people complained, they were told to shut up, mind your own business, leave us alone.

After 40 years of being told to shut up, mind your business, leave us alone, Does anyone here think that Church teaching changed?

Cohabitation with sex? When mom or dad complained, they got: Leave us alone. Mind your business. We’re adults! I don’t have to listen to you anymore!

Gay marriage wasn’t even on the radar until a few years ago, and people have the nerve to post here like it’s always been around? Wake up!

Telling people not to fornicate or commit adultery has been made more difficult by a constant, 24/7 media assault that tells you to do the exact opposite. I picked up the newspaper and read the advice column. A man trapped in a loveless - no sex - marriage asked what he should do. The advice? Get the sex somewhere else.

Gay people, right now, do not need anybody’s permission to do whatever they want. If they want gay marriage so bad, why did it have to go on the ballot? Voters in California defeated it twice, but that obviously did not matter.

God bless,
Ed
 
My answers are in bold. I have a son and I will make sure to teach him that some people are homosexuals and it is normal.
How do you know homosexual behavior is normal? Is polyamory - multiple sex partners - normal? That’s been proposed in Canada right now.

God bless,
Ed
 
Do you think being Catholic is going to stop someone from being gay or something?
Some people are gay. That’s not the topic of this thread. The topic is gay marriage - a very specific subject.

God bless,
Ed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top